Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #381907

Re: Broken Science- a lot of published research is false.

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> http://theweek.com/articles/618141/big-science-broken
> 
> http://www.firstthings.com/article/2016/05/scientific-regress
> 
> Broken Science- a lot of published research is false.
> 
> false
> fôls/
> adjective
> adjective: false; comparative adjective: falser; superlative adjective: falsest
> 
>     1.
>     not according with truth or fact; incorrect.
>     "the test can produce false results"
>     synonyms:   incorrect, untrue, wrong, erroneous, fallacious, flawed, distorted, inaccurate, imprecise; untruthful, fictitious, concocted, fabricated, invented, made up, trumped up, unfounded, spurious;
>     counterfeit, forged, fraudulent
>     "a false report"
>     antonyms:   correct, truthful
>         not according with rules or law.
>         "false imprisonment"
>     2.
>     appearing to be the thing denoted; deliberately made or meant to deceive.
> 
> incorrect, untrue, wrong, erroneous, fallacious, flawed, distorted, inaccurate, imprecise; untruthful, fictitious, concocted, fabricated, invented, made up, and
> meant to deceive.
> 
> and i have to get through all your fuckin garbage!
> 
> Get on a rocket, and get the fuck out-of-my-planet!!!!
> 
> You got fuckin 24 hours! I don't give a fuck if your rocket ship isn't ready! Let it fukin blow up wit yous in it.
> 
> everyday is fuckin garbage from yous guys....EVERYDAY!
> 
> you can fukin drown in your space suits!

and take your stupid teachers with you! (tell them the odds of the ship
blowing up is a billion to one) (more false info, isn't it?)


"the scientific method has "self-correcting mechanisms" that ensure
that, eventually, the truth will prevail. 
Unfortunately for all of us, Wilson makes a convincing argument that
those self-correcting mechanisms are broken."

http://theweek.com/articles/618141/big-science-broken


it's broken.


don't bother to fix it, it's too old...

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Broken Science- a lot of published research is false. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-18 11:05 -0700
  Re: Broken Science- a lot of published research is false. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-18 12:48 -0700
    Re: Broken Science- a lot of published research is false. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-18 12:56 -0700
      Re: Broken Science- a lot of published research is false. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-18 18:06 -0700
        Re: Broken Science- a lot of published research is false. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-18 22:06 -0700
          Re: Broken Science- a lot of published research is false. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-18 22:14 -0700
            Re: Broken Science- a lot of published research is false. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-18 22:36 -0700
              Re: Broken Science- a lot of published research is false. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-18 22:40 -0700
                Re: Broken Science- a lot of published research is false. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-18 22:41 -0700
                Re: Broken Science- a lot of published research is false. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-18 22:47 -0700
  Re: Broken Science- a lot of published research is false. Eric Baird <erkdemon@gmail.com> - 2016-05-01 05:14 -0700

csiph-web