Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #381929

Re: Broken Science- a lot of published research is false.

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > http://theweek.com/articles/618141/big-science-broken
> > > >
> > > > http://www.firstthings.com/article/2016/05/scientific-regress
> > > >
> > > > Broken Science- a lot of published research is false.
> > > >
> > > > false
> > > > fôls/
> > > > adjective
> > > > adjective: false; comparative adjective: falser; superlative adjective: falsest
> > > >
> > > >     1.
> > > >     not according with truth or fact; incorrect.
> > > >     "the test can produce false results"
> > > >     synonyms:   incorrect, untrue, wrong, erroneous, fallacious, flawed, distorted, inaccurate, imprecise; untruthful, fictitious, concocted, fabricated, invented, made up, trumped up, unfounded, spurious;
> > > >     counterfeit, forged, fraudulent
> > > >     "a false report"
> > > >     antonyms:   correct, truthful
> > > >         not according with rules or law.
> > > >         "false imprisonment"
> > > >     2.
> > > >     appearing to be the thing denoted; deliberately made or meant to deceive.
> > > >
> > > > incorrect, untrue, wrong, erroneous, fallacious, flawed, distorted, inaccurate, imprecise; untruthful, fictitious, concocted, fabricated, invented, made up, and
> > > > meant to deceive.
> > > >
> > > > and i have to get through all your fuckin garbage!
> > > >
> > > > Get on a rocket, and get the fuck out-of-my-planet!!!!
> > > >
> > > > You got fuckin 24 hours! I don't give a fuck if your rocket ship isn't ready! Let it fukin blow up wit yous in it.
> > > >
> > > > everyday is fuckin garbage from yous guys....EVERYDAY!
> > > >
> > > > you can fukin drown in your space suits!
> > >
> > > and take your stupid teachers with you! (tell them the odds of the ship
> > > blowing up is a billion to one) (more false info, isn't it?)
> > >
> > > "the scientific method has "self-correcting mechanisms" that ensure
> > > that, eventually, the truth will prevail.
> > > Unfortunately for all of us, Wilson makes a convincing argument that
> > > those self-correcting mechanisms are broken."
> > >
> > > http://theweek.com/articles/618141/big-science-broken
> > >
> > > it's broken.
> > >
> > > don't bother to fix it, it's too old...
> >
> > "For starters, there's a "replication crisis" in science."
> > http://theweek.com/articles/618141/big-science-broken
> >
> > Translation: "I no need to stinky fuckin replicate it!!!"
> 
> "...gravitational waves at the BICEP2 experiment in Antarctica,  — have now been retracted, with far less fanfare than when they were first published."
> http://theweek.com/articles/618141/big-science-broken
> 
> Translation: gravitational waves have not been detected.
> 
> why do you guys fall for this false stuff....wishful thinkers? Your thing called Science, is over. There is nothing else to discover except false discoveries.


"Steven Levitt, of Freakonomics fame, largely built his career on a
paper arguing that abortion led to lower crime rates 20 years later
because the aborted babies were disproportionately future criminals. Two
economists went through the painstaking work of recoding Levitt's
statistical analysis — and found a basic arithmetic error."


"the aborted babies were disproportionately future criminals."????
http://theweek.com/articles/618141/big-science-broken

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Broken Science- a lot of published research is false. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-18 11:05 -0700
  Re: Broken Science- a lot of published research is false. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-18 12:48 -0700
    Re: Broken Science- a lot of published research is false. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-18 12:56 -0700
      Re: Broken Science- a lot of published research is false. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-18 18:06 -0700
        Re: Broken Science- a lot of published research is false. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-18 22:06 -0700
          Re: Broken Science- a lot of published research is false. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-18 22:14 -0700
            Re: Broken Science- a lot of published research is false. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-18 22:36 -0700
              Re: Broken Science- a lot of published research is false. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-18 22:40 -0700
                Re: Broken Science- a lot of published research is false. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-18 22:41 -0700
                Re: Broken Science- a lot of published research is false. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-18 22:47 -0700
  Re: Broken Science- a lot of published research is false. Eric Baird <erkdemon@gmail.com> - 2016-05-01 05:14 -0700

csiph-web