Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #381903
| Path | csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.glorb.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Mon, 18 Apr 2016 13:05:20 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <571521FC.6D7A@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
| Date | Mon, 18 Apr 2016 11:05:48 -0700 |
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
| Reply-To | starmaker@ix.netcom.com |
| X-Mailer | Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Newsgroups | rec.arts.sf.written, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, alt.astronomy |
| Subject | Broken Science- a lot of published research is false. |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| Lines | 47 |
| X-Usenet-Provider | http://www.giganews.com |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 108.219.229.47 |
| X-Trace | sv3-A1dnR0QXU3eXwb/ywddL4h6LMTi4WlOE0ynOzCP8rtNomjRrPDhlOOaoPSBEpuc8+oSVcDO8rXB/hX3!uzMt9pIEZjvNIM0IbmrkHjjmtD145CRI8PPg2XDudpUkKuLRmx9hMAfCv+MVgDnDCHXw2fH1rPa6!CjCwIuWcN8Q= |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly |
| X-Postfilter | 1.3.40 |
| X-Original-Bytes | 2430 |
| Xref | csiph.com rec.arts.sf.written:438266 sci.physics:571351 sci.physics.relativity:381903 alt.astronomy:284151 |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
Show key headers only | View raw
http://theweek.com/articles/618141/big-science-broken
http://www.firstthings.com/article/2016/05/scientific-regress
Broken Science- a lot of published research is false.
false
fôls/
adjective
adjective: false; comparative adjective: falser; superlative adjective: falsest
1.
not according with truth or fact; incorrect.
"the test can produce false results"
synonyms: incorrect, untrue, wrong, erroneous, fallacious, flawed, distorted, inaccurate, imprecise; untruthful, fictitious, concocted, fabricated, invented, made up, trumped up, unfounded, spurious;
counterfeit, forged, fraudulent
"a false report"
antonyms: correct, truthful
not according with rules or law.
"false imprisonment"
2.
appearing to be the thing denoted; deliberately made or meant to deceive.
incorrect, untrue, wrong, erroneous, fallacious, flawed, distorted, inaccurate, imprecise; untruthful, fictitious, concocted, fabricated, invented, made up, and
meant to deceive.
and i have to get through all your fuckin garbage!
Get on a rocket, and get the fuck out-of-my-planet!!!!
You got fuckin 24 hours! I don't give a fuck if your rocket ship isn't ready! Let it fukin blow up wit yous in it.
everyday is fuckin garbage frOm yous guys....EVERYDAY!
you can fukin drown in your space suits!
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Broken Science- a lot of published research is false. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-18 11:05 -0700
Re: Broken Science- a lot of published research is false. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-18 12:48 -0700
Re: Broken Science- a lot of published research is false. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-18 12:56 -0700
Re: Broken Science- a lot of published research is false. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-18 18:06 -0700
Re: Broken Science- a lot of published research is false. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-18 22:06 -0700
Re: Broken Science- a lot of published research is false. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-18 22:14 -0700
Re: Broken Science- a lot of published research is false. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-18 22:36 -0700
Re: Broken Science- a lot of published research is false. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-18 22:40 -0700
Re: Broken Science- a lot of published research is false. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-18 22:41 -0700
Re: Broken Science- a lot of published research is false. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-18 22:47 -0700
Re: Broken Science- a lot of published research is false. Eric Baird <erkdemon@gmail.com> - 2016-05-01 05:14 -0700
csiph-web