Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #376502

Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true.

Path	csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!2.us.feeder.erje.net!news.glorb.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date	Thu, 18 Feb 2016 18:29:12 -0600
Message-ID	<56C661E7.3D77@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date	Thu, 18 Feb 2016 16:29:27 -0800
From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To	starmaker@ix.netcom.com
X-Mailer	Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
MIME-Version	1.0
Newsgroups	rec.arts.sf.written, alt.astronomy, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true.
References	<56C37C07.5882@ix.netcom.com> <56C4153A.3A1@ix.netcom.com> <56C4B116.7835@ix.netcom.com> <lOadnaBYLL4fL1nLnZ2dnUU7-cmdnZ2d@giganews.com> <56C4FE70.1ADC@ix.netcom.com> <56C5789C.25C6@ix.netcom.com> <Erfxy.6012$xT.5852@fx10.iad> <56C61AFD.3C27@ix.netcom.com> <iPCdndsYYdLSuVvLnZ2dnUU7-fsAAAAA@giganews.com> <56C64109.3B1@ix.netcom.com> <PuSdnTw5FOAv3FvLnZ2dnUU7-bsAAAAA@giganews.com>
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
Lines	28
X-Usenet-Provider	http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host	162.239.141.5
X-Trace	sv3-u9S3COjv0c3JhZmVduCljBbo6ILwAR6YB7B/hwtrJXpODE2FpX5lSZ4/MoeRG1OaScOfxY96/ZHlu6l!rWaa2dIMrCWNoy2S800HubVGXU/7k0op8Syy4+xIKF+LTbakxPOtLOFNjOhYzMRLvTK9NzoIIls4!6SxU1gVmXg==
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info	Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info	Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter	1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes	2134
Xref	csiph.com rec.arts.sf.written:433530 alt.astronomy:282270 sci.physics:554461 sci.physics.relativity:376502

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

Sam Wormley wrote:
> 
> On 2/18/16 4:09 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Sam Wormley wrote:
> >>
> >> On 2/18/16 1:26 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >>> Jumping off a roof does not prove gravity is true or exist.. all it
> >>> proves that people fall down.
> >>
> >>     What force causes them to fall down?
> >>
> >
> >
> > I don't care to speculate.
> >
> 
>    No problem, the rest of us know.
> 

The rest of yous know 'What force causes them to fall down' is not known, and has not proven to be true.

Unless you can point to a link that states unequivocally that the theory of gravity has been proven to be true...

I'll accept user-edited websites like wiki.

Thread

GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 11:44 -0800
  Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 14:44 -0600
    Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 12:49 -0800
      Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 15:26 -0600
        Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 14:27 -0800
          Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 17:31 -0600
            Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 15:54 -0800
              Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 18:05 -0600
                Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 21:28 -0800
  Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 22:37 -0800
    Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-17 09:42 -0800
      Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 11:48 -0600
        Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-17 15:12 -0800
          Re: GRAVITY... David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-02-17 15:29 -0800
          Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 19:02 -0600
          Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-17 23:54 -0800
            Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 03:40 -0500
              Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-18 11:16 -0500
              Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-18 11:26 -0800
                Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 14:06 -0600
                Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-18 14:09 -0800
                Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 16:12 -0600
                Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-18 16:29 -0800
                Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. oriel36 <kelleher.gerald@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 05:00 -0800
                Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-19 12:06 -0800
          Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-19 23:24 -0800
            Re: GRAVITY... Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-20 05:33 -0800
            Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 13:24 -0600
      Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 11:55 -0600
        Re: GRAVITY... Monique de Brabant <moniqb@cafedelmar.org> - 2016-02-18 15:55 +0000

csiph-web