Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #376598

Re: GRAVITY...

Message-ID	<56C8149D.47A6@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date	2016-02-19 23:24 -0800
From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups	rec.arts.sf.written, alt.astronomy, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: GRAVITY...
References	<56C37C07.5882@ix.netcom.com> <56C4153A.3A1@ix.netcom.com> <56C4B116.7835@ix.netcom.com> <lOadnaBYLL4fL1nLnZ2dnUU7-cmdnZ2d@giganews.com> <56C4FE70.1ADC@ix.netcom.com>

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Sam Wormley wrote:
> >
> > On 2/17/16 11:42 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > I mean, if you haven't even prove that Gravity exist
> >
> >    You saw a guy fall, therefore, gravity exists.
> >
> >    You see satellites orbiting other bodies, therefore, gravity exists.
> >
> >    You once got hit bu a falling apple, acorn or walnut,
> >    therefore, gravity exists.
> >
> >    You have noted that big balls of gas and plasma exist using hydrogen
> >    into helium, therefore, gravity exists.
> >
> >    The existence og gravitation or warped spacetime is not in question.
> 
> You have no evidence that gravity exist.
> 
> I'll ask you a question...is Gravity a Theory?
> 
> : an idea that is suggested or presented as possibly true but that is not known or proven to be true
> http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/theory
> 
> I'll ask you this question...is Gravity a Theory? Yes or No??
> 
> or
> 
> Is there a theory called... The Theory of Gravity??? Si or No, senoir?
> 
> Ja or nien?


Sam Wormley could not answer the question "is Gravity a Theory? Yes or No??" because...

the truth can be answered with either a Yes or No answer.


Any question in the universe can be answered with a Yes or No answer.


Are there aliens on other planets? No.


Is there water on Mars? No.


Are we alone. Yes.


Is there a God?


You might not know the answer but it's either yes or no...



Any question in the universe can be answered with a Yes or No answer.

Thread

GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 11:44 -0800
  Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 14:44 -0600
    Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 12:49 -0800
      Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 15:26 -0600
        Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 14:27 -0800
          Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 17:31 -0600
            Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 15:54 -0800
              Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 18:05 -0600
                Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 21:28 -0800
  Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 22:37 -0800
    Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-17 09:42 -0800
      Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 11:48 -0600
        Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-17 15:12 -0800
          Re: GRAVITY... David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-02-17 15:29 -0800
          Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 19:02 -0600
          Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-17 23:54 -0800
            Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 03:40 -0500
              Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-18 11:16 -0500
              Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-18 11:26 -0800
                Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 14:06 -0600
                Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-18 14:09 -0800
                Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 16:12 -0600
                Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-18 16:29 -0800
                Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. oriel36 <kelleher.gerald@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 05:00 -0800
                Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-19 12:06 -0800
          Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-19 23:24 -0800
            Re: GRAVITY... Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-20 05:33 -0800
            Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 13:24 -0600
      Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 11:55 -0600
        Re: GRAVITY... Monique de Brabant <moniqb@cafedelmar.org> - 2016-02-18 15:55 +0000

csiph-web