Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #376436

Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true.

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Sam Wormley wrote:
> >
> > On 2/17/16 11:42 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > I mean, if you haven't even prove that Gravity exist
> >
> >    You saw a guy fall, therefore, gravity exists.
> >
> >    You see satellites orbiting other bodies, therefore, gravity exists.
> >
> >    You once got hit bu a falling apple, acorn or walnut,
> >    therefore, gravity exists.
> >
> >    You have noted that big balls of gas and plasma exist using hydrogen
> >    into helium, therefore, gravity exists.
> >
> >    The existence og gravitation or warped spacetime is not in question.
> 
> You have no evidence that gravity exist.
> 
> I'll ask you a question...is Gravity a Theory?
> 
> : an idea that is suggested or presented as possibly true but that is not known or proven to be true
> http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/theory
> 
> I'll ask you this question...is Gravity a Theory? Yes or No??
> 
> or
> 
> Is there a theory called... The Theory of Gravity??? Si or No, senoir?
> 
> Ja or nien?


Just so everyone knows...a theory means; is not known or proven to be true.

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/theory


(most of these science guys never read a dictionary)

To be clear...a theory means; is not known or proven to be true.

It doesn't make a difference if it's a Einstein theory...a theory means; is not known or proven to be true.

The theory of Gravity is not known or proven to be true.

Gravity waves, is not known or proven to be true.

In other words...The theory of Gravity has not been proven to be true.


Anybody tells you different, is lying to you.


Why they lie? I don't know...maybe they're not in touch with reality.


They'll try to fool you by putting an Einstein name next to the word theory, as if it makes it more true...
but it doesn't matter whose theory it is...if it is a theory, it is not known or proven to be true.


In other words Einstein theory of gravitation/gravity has not been proven to be true.


The truth is, I don't even think anybody really knows what gravity is...or if it really exist.













The Starmaker

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 11:44 -0800
  Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 14:44 -0600
    Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 12:49 -0800
      Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 15:26 -0600
        Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 14:27 -0800
          Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 17:31 -0600
            Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 15:54 -0800
              Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 18:05 -0600
                Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 21:28 -0800
  Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 22:37 -0800
    Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-17 09:42 -0800
      Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 11:48 -0600
        Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-17 15:12 -0800
          Re: GRAVITY... David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-02-17 15:29 -0800
          Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 19:02 -0600
          Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-17 23:54 -0800
            Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 03:40 -0500
              Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-18 11:16 -0500
              Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-18 11:26 -0800
                Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 14:06 -0600
                Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-18 14:09 -0800
                Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 16:12 -0600
                Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-18 16:29 -0800
                Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. oriel36 <kelleher.gerald@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 05:00 -0800
                Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-19 12:06 -0800
          Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-19 23:24 -0800
            Re: GRAVITY... Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-20 05:33 -0800
            Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 13:24 -0600
      Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 11:55 -0600
        Re: GRAVITY... Monique de Brabant <moniqb@cafedelmar.org> - 2016-02-18 15:55 +0000

csiph-web