Path: csiph.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 01:54:01 -0600 Message-ID: <56C5789C.25C6@ix.netcom.com> Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 23:54:04 -0800 From: The Starmaker Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written,alt.astronomy,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. References: <56C37C07.5882@ix.netcom.com> <56C4153A.3A1@ix.netcom.com> <56C4B116.7835@ix.netcom.com> <56C4FE70.1ADC@ix.netcom.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 81 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 162.239.141.5 X-Trace: sv3-QNeZ2yVweaARrkoaXLw758RHpQG3wIE6FNQnUVBlWUHeq3fl/rSNrj6xSHm2PbIBV7bvLVcHjgCHGRT!KD511woqi5oM7TvEaKBSBooZtHvGCwGXzdhQ9WLpfTlXbaNIQ7ADtgwINt/FPu8y8c27MfRJUT14!2azG82BBiQ== X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 X-Original-Bytes: 3404 Xref: csiph.com rec.arts.sf.written:433475 alt.astronomy:282241 sci.physics:554177 sci.physics.relativity:376436 The Starmaker wrote: > > Sam Wormley wrote: > > > > On 2/17/16 11:42 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > > > I mean, if you haven't even prove that Gravity exist > > > > You saw a guy fall, therefore, gravity exists. > > > > You see satellites orbiting other bodies, therefore, gravity exists. > > > > You once got hit bu a falling apple, acorn or walnut, > > therefore, gravity exists. > > > > You have noted that big balls of gas and plasma exist using hydrogen > > into helium, therefore, gravity exists. > > > > The existence og gravitation or warped spacetime is not in question. > > You have no evidence that gravity exist. > > I'll ask you a question...is Gravity a Theory? > > : an idea that is suggested or presented as possibly true but that is not known or proven to be true > http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/theory > > I'll ask you this question...is Gravity a Theory? Yes or No?? > > or > > Is there a theory called... The Theory of Gravity??? Si or No, senoir? > > Ja or nien? Just so everyone knows...a theory means; is not known or proven to be true. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/theory (most of these science guys never read a dictionary) To be clear...a theory means; is not known or proven to be true. It doesn't make a difference if it's a Einstein theory...a theory means; is not known or proven to be true. The theory of Gravity is not known or proven to be true. Gravity waves, is not known or proven to be true. In other words...The theory of Gravity has not been proven to be true. Anybody tells you different, is lying to you. Why they lie? I don't know...maybe they're not in touch with reality. They'll try to fool you by putting an Einstein name next to the word theory, as if it makes it more true... but it doesn't matter whose theory it is...if it is a theory, it is not known or proven to be true. In other words Einstein theory of gravitation/gravity has not been proven to be true. The truth is, I don't even think anybody really knows what gravity is...or if it really exist. The Starmaker