Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #376379

Re: GRAVITY...

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

Sam Wormley wrote:
> 
> On 2/16/16 5:54 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Sam Wormley wrote:
> >>
> >> On 2/16/16 4:27 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >>> Sam Wormley wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2/16/16 2:49 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >>>>> Sam Wormley wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 2/16/16 1:44 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >>>>>>> i saw
> >>>>>>> a person
> >>>>>>> fall down..
> >>>>>>> and i
> >>>>>>> wondered to
> >>>>>>> myself...
> >>>>>>> how many planets
> >>>>>>> were involved?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>       Every bit of momentum-energy was involved, but not all significantly.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Are you saying Gravity contains...energy???
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>      No...
> >>>>      According to general relativity, our best model of gravitation, mass,
> >>>>      mass in motion and energy (momentum-energy) warp spacetime resulting
> >>>>      in what we call gravitation.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> There is no such word as "momentum-energy".
> >>>
> >>
> >>     It's routinely used in general relativity textbooks. And it is much
> >>     easier than saying mass, mass in motion and energy.
> >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy–momentum_relation
> >>
> >>     E^2 = (mc^2)^2 + (pc)^2
> >>
> >
> >
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy%E2%80%93momentum_relation
> >
> > Energy–momentum_relation or "momentum-energy"
> >
> > has nothing to do with Gravity!
> >
> 
>    Even some school kids know the mass and energy warp spacetime and that
>    warped spacetime tells mass how to move (gravity)
> 
>    "Gravity is not a foreign and physical force transmitted through space
>    and time. It is a manifestation of the curvature of spacetime."
>    That, in a nutshell, is Einstein's theory.
> 


"manifestation"???? sounds too religious to me...


manifestation is not physics, it's metaphysical...physcology.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 11:44 -0800
  Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 14:44 -0600
    Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 12:49 -0800
      Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 15:26 -0600
        Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 14:27 -0800
          Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 17:31 -0600
            Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 15:54 -0800
              Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 18:05 -0600
                Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 21:28 -0800
  Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 22:37 -0800
    Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-17 09:42 -0800
      Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 11:48 -0600
        Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-17 15:12 -0800
          Re: GRAVITY... David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-02-17 15:29 -0800
          Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 19:02 -0600
          Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-17 23:54 -0800
            Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 03:40 -0500
              Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-18 11:16 -0500
              Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-18 11:26 -0800
                Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 14:06 -0600
                Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-18 14:09 -0800
                Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 16:12 -0600
                Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-18 16:29 -0800
                Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. oriel36 <kelleher.gerald@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 05:00 -0800
                Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-19 12:06 -0800
          Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-19 23:24 -0800
            Re: GRAVITY... Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-20 05:33 -0800
            Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 13:24 -0600
      Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 11:55 -0600
        Re: GRAVITY... Monique de Brabant <moniqb@cafedelmar.org> - 2016-02-18 15:55 +0000

csiph-web