Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #376372

Re: GRAVITY...

Path csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!2.us.feeder.erje.net!newspeer1.nac.net!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date Tue, 16 Feb 2016 17:54:24 -0600
Message-ID <56C3B6BA.3905@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date Tue, 16 Feb 2016 15:54:34 -0800
From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To starmaker@ix.netcom.com
X-Mailer Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
MIME-Version 1.0
Newsgroups alt.astronomy, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: GRAVITY...
References <56C37C07.5882@ix.netcom.com> <msKdnTe6WcexF17LnZ2dnUU7-ImdnZ2d@giganews.com> <56C38B72.A1E@ix.netcom.com> <msKdnTC6Wce8CV7LnZ2dnUU7-ImdnZ2d@giganews.com> <56C3A23C.EEE@ix.netcom.com> <J9udnfI_jvjCLF7LnZ2dnUU7-bsAAAAA@giganews.com>
Content-Type text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8bit
Lines 51
X-Usenet-Provider http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host 162.239.141.5
X-Trace sv3-x9oilW/E5AeqphX5YZN35nqg2n9+vEXkSyXY6JHSu46K1OQraboarZQz+3vgskdK3xP8uErLMrznxqH!fXrphj5tdUudMjxblkPiKM+ekokplnSq4yDij6+/bTYniH/0lLb7ccsUkiezWf8eyLRPz4xfZXcL!jCXLtA/sWw==
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes 2624
Xref csiph.com alt.astronomy:282188 sci.physics:553680 sci.physics.relativity:376372

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

Sam Wormley wrote:
> 
> On 2/16/16 4:27 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Sam Wormley wrote:
> >>
> >> On 2/16/16 2:49 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >>> Sam Wormley wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2/16/16 1:44 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >>>>> i saw
> >>>>> a person
> >>>>> fall down..
> >>>>> and i
> >>>>> wondered to
> >>>>> myself...
> >>>>> how many planets
> >>>>> were involved?
> >>>>
> >>>>      Every bit of momentum-energy was involved, but not all significantly.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Are you saying Gravity contains...energy???
> >>>
> >>
> >>     No...
> >>     According to general relativity, our best model of gravitation, mass,
> >>     mass in motion and energy (momentum-energy) warp spacetime resulting
> >>     in what we call gravitation.
> >
> >
> > There is no such word as "momentum-energy".
> >
> 
>    It's routinely used in general relativity textbooks. And it is much
>    easier than saying mass, mass in motion and energy.
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy–momentum_relation
> 
>    E^2 = (mc^2)^2 + (pc)^2
> 


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy%E2%80%93momentum_relation 

Energy–momentum_relation or "momentum-energy"

has nothing to do with Gravity!

Do you see any mention of the word "Gravity" on the page from the link
you provided????
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy%E2%80%93momentum_relation

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 11:44 -0800
  Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 14:44 -0600
    Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 12:49 -0800
      Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 15:26 -0600
        Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 14:27 -0800
          Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 17:31 -0600
            Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 15:54 -0800
              Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 18:05 -0600
                Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 21:28 -0800
  Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 22:37 -0800
    Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-17 09:42 -0800
      Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 11:48 -0600
        Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-17 15:12 -0800
          Re: GRAVITY... David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-02-17 15:29 -0800
          Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 19:02 -0600
          Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-17 23:54 -0800
            Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 03:40 -0500
              Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-18 11:16 -0500
              Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-18 11:26 -0800
                Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 14:06 -0600
                Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-18 14:09 -0800
                Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 16:12 -0600
                Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-18 16:29 -0800
                Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. oriel36 <kelleher.gerald@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 05:00 -0800
                Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-19 12:06 -0800
          Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-19 23:24 -0800
            Re: GRAVITY... Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-20 05:33 -0800
            Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 13:24 -0600
      Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 11:55 -0600
        Re: GRAVITY... Monique de Brabant <moniqb@cafedelmar.org> - 2016-02-18 15:55 +0000

csiph-web