Path: csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!2.us.feeder.erje.net!newspeer1.nac.net!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 17:54:24 -0600 Message-ID: <56C3B6BA.3905@ix.netcom.com> Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 15:54:34 -0800 From: The Starmaker Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: GRAVITY... References: <56C37C07.5882@ix.netcom.com> <56C38B72.A1E@ix.netcom.com> <56C3A23C.EEE@ix.netcom.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 51 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 162.239.141.5 X-Trace: sv3-x9oilW/E5AeqphX5YZN35nqg2n9+vEXkSyXY6JHSu46K1OQraboarZQz+3vgskdK3xP8uErLMrznxqH!fXrphj5tdUudMjxblkPiKM+ekokplnSq4yDij6+/bTYniH/0lLb7ccsUkiezWf8eyLRPz4xfZXcL!jCXLtA/sWw== X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 X-Original-Bytes: 2624 Xref: csiph.com alt.astronomy:282188 sci.physics:553680 sci.physics.relativity:376372 Sam Wormley wrote: > > On 2/16/16 4:27 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > Sam Wormley wrote: > >> > >> On 2/16/16 2:49 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > >>> Sam Wormley wrote: > >>>> > >>>> On 2/16/16 1:44 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > >>>>> i saw > >>>>> a person > >>>>> fall down.. > >>>>> and i > >>>>> wondered to > >>>>> myself... > >>>>> how many planets > >>>>> were involved? > >>>> > >>>> Every bit of momentum-energy was involved, but not all significantly. > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Are you saying Gravity contains...energy??? > >>> > >> > >> No... > >> According to general relativity, our best model of gravitation, mass, > >> mass in motion and energy (momentum-energy) warp spacetime resulting > >> in what we call gravitation. > > > > > > There is no such word as "momentum-energy". > > > > It's routinely used in general relativity textbooks. And it is much > easier than saying mass, mass in motion and energy. > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy–momentum_relation > > E^2 = (mc^2)^2 + (pc)^2 > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy%E2%80%93momentum_relation Energy–momentum_relation or "momentum-energy" has nothing to do with Gravity! Do you see any mention of the word "Gravity" on the page from the link you provided???? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy%E2%80%93momentum_relation