Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #372891

Re: The Inverse Square Law explained

Path csiph.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!peer03.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date Tue, 29 Dec 2015 12:11:49 -0600
Message-ID <5682CCEB.C14@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date Tue, 29 Dec 2015 10:11:55 -0800
From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To starmaker@ix.netcom.com
X-Mailer Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
MIME-Version 1.0
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: The Inverse Square Law explained
References <df089806-c698-4fb8-97a7-d8d58ed3df7b@googlegroups.com> <n5chhj$to5$1@speranza.aioe.org> <1637288.fnPO6jQxUB@PointedEars.de> <5ff87992-a8d8-4a71-9e98-61116ea6ba10@googlegroups.com> <17702871.7RnZnggNuE@PointedEars.de> <c6212721-c902-422c-a05b-a68ac616088a@googlegroups.com> <7118782.6mxME6tmbB@PointedEars.de> <f660ec2f-98b9-4045-a917-b6f0f2063e05@googlegroups.com> <6154357.zACPRpkuFq@PointedEars.de> <n5r5qb$rhb$1@speranza.aioe.org>
Content-Type text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
Lines 23
X-Usenet-Provider http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host 162.239.141.5
X-Trace sv3-5OOP0mcSuF8BZtyeHNmbJrUTTdJg++A8ENfByNBDt/8eWspBi0b/tM9qezt22Ye11FX5s22YUhNBGGY!KGC0oOlZ/gtadDyHXQ5c+Ar9o9lPXcys0eKBr/rQPA6uQ84YoMnWVamGe/GY4sRoPJgqM1ChhlWL!tlRooXnv
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes 1799
X-Received-Bytes 1911
X-Received-Body-CRC 1980603089
Xref csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:372891

Show key headers only | View raw

yous people are missing a dimension here somewhere..

it is not a " Inverse Square Law "...

it is a cube, that means a square that has 3 dimensions...

isn't about time yous start calling it a


       Inverse Cube Law   ?




The Starmaker 




Get with the program!


i don't have time to be conducting physics classes here...

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

The Inverse Square Law explained Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2015-12-22 08:00 -0800
  Re: The Inverse Square Law explained David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2015-12-22 10:13 -0800
    Re: The Inverse Square Law explained David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2015-12-22 10:17 -0800
    Re: The Inverse Square Law explained David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2015-12-22 10:19 -0800
  Re: The Inverse Square Law explained Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-12-22 12:50 -0600
    Re: The Inverse Square Law explained alsor@interia.pl - 2015-12-22 12:14 -0800
      Re: The Inverse Square Law explained JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-12-28 21:11 -0800
        Re: The Inverse Square Law explained alsor@interia.pl - 2015-12-29 09:18 -0800
  Re: The Inverse Square Law explained Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-12-22 16:06 -0600
    Re: The Inverse Square Law explained Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-12-27 00:42 +0100
      Re: The Inverse Square Law explained alsor@interia.pl - 2015-12-27 07:50 -0800
        Re: The Inverse Square Law explained Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-12-27 20:12 +0100
          Re: The Inverse Square Law explained alsor@interia.pl - 2015-12-27 14:30 -0800
            Re: The Inverse Square Law explained Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-12-28 00:23 +0100
              Re: The Inverse Square Law explained alsor@interia.pl - 2015-12-27 15:58 -0800
                Re: The Inverse Square Law explained Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-12-28 11:59 +0100
                Re: The Inverse Square Law explained Waye Kitchens <wscom@complang.net> - 2015-12-28 11:18 +0000
                Re: The Inverse Square Law explained The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-29 10:11 -0800
                Re: The Inverse Square Law explained Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-29 13:08 -0800
                Re: The Inverse Square Law explained alsor@interia.pl - 2015-12-29 15:19 -0800
                Re: The Inverse Square Law explained David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2015-12-29 17:13 -0800
                Re: The Inverse Square Law explained David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2015-12-29 17:16 -0800
                Re: The Inverse Square Law explained alsor@interia.pl - 2015-12-31 05:31 -0800
      Re: The Inverse Square Law explained John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-01 18:28 -0800
        Re: The Inverse Square Law explained Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-01-02 23:48 +0100

csiph-web