Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #372818

Re: The Inverse Square Law explained

From	Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: The Inverse Square Law explained
Date	2015-12-27 20:12 +0100
Organization	PointedEars Software (PES)
Message-ID	<17702871.7RnZnggNuE@PointedEars.de> (permalink)
References	<df089806-c698-4fb8-97a7-d8d58ed3df7b@googlegroups.com> <n5chhj$to5$1@speranza.aioe.org> <1637288.fnPO6jQxUB@PointedEars.de> <5ff87992-a8d8-4a71-9e98-61116ea6ba10@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

alsor@interia.pl wrote:

> W dniu niedziela, 27 grudnia 2015 00:42:11 UTC+1 użytkownik Thomas
>> So neither Gauss’s theorem nor law could have been Newton’s foundation.
>> It is not known how Newton got the idea of the inverse square law
> 
> You talk nonsense...
> after all it's just a surface of a sphere... S = 4pir^2.
> thus the force must be in the form: f = k/S.
> 
> actualy it's: f = GM/r^2;
> so, the G const is incorrectly choosen..
> it should be rather: G' = G/4pi = 5.3e-12 ...

As usual, utter nonsense from you.


PointedEars
-- 
Q: What did the nuclear physicist order for lunch?  
A: Fission chips.

(from: WolframAlpha)

Thread

The Inverse Square Law explained Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2015-12-22 08:00 -0800
  Re: The Inverse Square Law explained David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2015-12-22 10:13 -0800
    Re: The Inverse Square Law explained David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2015-12-22 10:17 -0800
    Re: The Inverse Square Law explained David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2015-12-22 10:19 -0800
  Re: The Inverse Square Law explained Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-12-22 12:50 -0600
    Re: The Inverse Square Law explained alsor@interia.pl - 2015-12-22 12:14 -0800
      Re: The Inverse Square Law explained JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-12-28 21:11 -0800
        Re: The Inverse Square Law explained alsor@interia.pl - 2015-12-29 09:18 -0800
  Re: The Inverse Square Law explained Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-12-22 16:06 -0600
    Re: The Inverse Square Law explained Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-12-27 00:42 +0100
      Re: The Inverse Square Law explained alsor@interia.pl - 2015-12-27 07:50 -0800
        Re: The Inverse Square Law explained Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-12-27 20:12 +0100
          Re: The Inverse Square Law explained alsor@interia.pl - 2015-12-27 14:30 -0800
            Re: The Inverse Square Law explained Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-12-28 00:23 +0100
              Re: The Inverse Square Law explained alsor@interia.pl - 2015-12-27 15:58 -0800
                Re: The Inverse Square Law explained Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-12-28 11:59 +0100
                Re: The Inverse Square Law explained Waye Kitchens <wscom@complang.net> - 2015-12-28 11:18 +0000
                Re: The Inverse Square Law explained The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-29 10:11 -0800
                Re: The Inverse Square Law explained Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-29 13:08 -0800
                Re: The Inverse Square Law explained alsor@interia.pl - 2015-12-29 15:19 -0800
                Re: The Inverse Square Law explained David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2015-12-29 17:13 -0800
                Re: The Inverse Square Law explained David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2015-12-29 17:16 -0800
                Re: The Inverse Square Law explained alsor@interia.pl - 2015-12-31 05:31 -0800
      Re: The Inverse Square Law explained John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-01 18:28 -0800
        Re: The Inverse Square Law explained Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-01-02 23:48 +0100

csiph-web