Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #372891
| Message-ID | <5682CCEB.C14@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-29 10:11 -0800 |
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: The Inverse Square Law explained |
| References | (5 earlier) <c6212721-c902-422c-a05b-a68ac616088a@googlegroups.com> <7118782.6mxME6tmbB@PointedEars.de> <f660ec2f-98b9-4045-a917-b6f0f2063e05@googlegroups.com> <6154357.zACPRpkuFq@PointedEars.de> <n5r5qb$rhb$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
yous people are missing a dimension here somewhere..
it is not a " Inverse Square Law "...
it is a cube, that means a square that has 3 dimensions...
isn't about time yous start calling it a
Inverse Cube Law ?
The Starmaker
Get with the program!
i don't have time to be conducting physics classes here...
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
The Inverse Square Law explained Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2015-12-22 08:00 -0800
Re: The Inverse Square Law explained David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2015-12-22 10:13 -0800
Re: The Inverse Square Law explained David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2015-12-22 10:17 -0800
Re: The Inverse Square Law explained David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2015-12-22 10:19 -0800
Re: The Inverse Square Law explained Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-12-22 12:50 -0600
Re: The Inverse Square Law explained alsor@interia.pl - 2015-12-22 12:14 -0800
Re: The Inverse Square Law explained JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-12-28 21:11 -0800
Re: The Inverse Square Law explained alsor@interia.pl - 2015-12-29 09:18 -0800
Re: The Inverse Square Law explained Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-12-22 16:06 -0600
Re: The Inverse Square Law explained Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-12-27 00:42 +0100
Re: The Inverse Square Law explained alsor@interia.pl - 2015-12-27 07:50 -0800
Re: The Inverse Square Law explained Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-12-27 20:12 +0100
Re: The Inverse Square Law explained alsor@interia.pl - 2015-12-27 14:30 -0800
Re: The Inverse Square Law explained Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-12-28 00:23 +0100
Re: The Inverse Square Law explained alsor@interia.pl - 2015-12-27 15:58 -0800
Re: The Inverse Square Law explained Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-12-28 11:59 +0100
Re: The Inverse Square Law explained Waye Kitchens <wscom@complang.net> - 2015-12-28 11:18 +0000
Re: The Inverse Square Law explained The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-29 10:11 -0800
Re: The Inverse Square Law explained Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-29 13:08 -0800
Re: The Inverse Square Law explained alsor@interia.pl - 2015-12-29 15:19 -0800
Re: The Inverse Square Law explained David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2015-12-29 17:13 -0800
Re: The Inverse Square Law explained David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2015-12-29 17:16 -0800
Re: The Inverse Square Law explained alsor@interia.pl - 2015-12-31 05:31 -0800
Re: The Inverse Square Law explained John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-01 18:28 -0800
Re: The Inverse Square Law explained Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-01-02 23:48 +0100
csiph-web