Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #373147

Re: The Inverse Square Law explained

Path	csiph.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!news.albasani.net!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: The Inverse Square Law explained
Date	Sat, 02 Jan 2016 23:48:11 +0100
Organization	PointedEars Software (PES)
Lines	21
Message-ID	<1515519.H0zyk4Jolt@PointedEars.de> (permalink)
References	<df089806-c698-4fb8-97a7-d8d58ed3df7b@googlegroups.com> <n5chhj$to5$1@speranza.aioe.org> <1637288.fnPO6jQxUB@PointedEars.de> <3f8c6d07-9d7a-41bf-8e88-b011203f1738@googlegroups.com>
Reply-To	Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <usenet@PointedEars.de>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7Bit
X-Trace	solani.org 1451774937 26538 eJwNy8kBwCAIBMCWuHbRcghK/yWY+Q+cys4gGBgMVXkqMflp+jWrxpI4lEixiL2r5cCWm/zvPgQgEAg= (2 Jan 2016 22:48:57 GMT)
X-Complaints-To	abuse@news.solani.org
NNTP-Posting-Date	Sat, 2 Jan 2016 22:48:57 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent	KNode/4.14.2
X-User-ID	eJwFwQcRADAIBDBLZR9yeIZ/CU1MnLxD3Vzt7Fg3DsE2la0nPZKijgZf5kKX1qf6QZ4wKTinHSCJyFfzAW0/Fhc=
Cancel-Lock	sha1:d8Z5XwkCSZ68LcccksU9XkFkmrg=
X-NNTP-Posting-Host	eJwFwQERADEIAzBLsNICcn7s8C/hE0KuyRAVXC4sz0OHXYuDuSGwOJsOcVcY72/7tVWFc378ihAZ
Xref	csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:373147

Show key headers only | View raw

John Gogo wrote:

> On Saturday, December 26, 2015 at 5:42:11 PM UTC-6, Thomas 'PointedEars'
> Lahn wrote:
>> --
>> Q: What did the female magnet say to the male magnet?
>> A: From the back, I found you repulsive, but from the front
>>    I find myself very attracted to you.
>> (from: WolframAlpha)
> 
> Quantify this, what is the relation of the quantity back to front?

One year later, and you still do not understand what a Usenet signature is.


PointedEars
-- 
Q: What did the nuclear physicist post on the laboratory door
   when he went camping?  
A: 'Gone fission'.
(from: WolframAlpha)

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

The Inverse Square Law explained Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2015-12-22 08:00 -0800
  Re: The Inverse Square Law explained David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2015-12-22 10:13 -0800
    Re: The Inverse Square Law explained David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2015-12-22 10:17 -0800
    Re: The Inverse Square Law explained David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2015-12-22 10:19 -0800
  Re: The Inverse Square Law explained Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-12-22 12:50 -0600
    Re: The Inverse Square Law explained alsor@interia.pl - 2015-12-22 12:14 -0800
      Re: The Inverse Square Law explained JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-12-28 21:11 -0800
        Re: The Inverse Square Law explained alsor@interia.pl - 2015-12-29 09:18 -0800
  Re: The Inverse Square Law explained Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-12-22 16:06 -0600
    Re: The Inverse Square Law explained Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-12-27 00:42 +0100
      Re: The Inverse Square Law explained alsor@interia.pl - 2015-12-27 07:50 -0800
        Re: The Inverse Square Law explained Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-12-27 20:12 +0100
          Re: The Inverse Square Law explained alsor@interia.pl - 2015-12-27 14:30 -0800
            Re: The Inverse Square Law explained Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-12-28 00:23 +0100
              Re: The Inverse Square Law explained alsor@interia.pl - 2015-12-27 15:58 -0800
                Re: The Inverse Square Law explained Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-12-28 11:59 +0100
                Re: The Inverse Square Law explained Waye Kitchens <wscom@complang.net> - 2015-12-28 11:18 +0000
                Re: The Inverse Square Law explained The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-29 10:11 -0800
                Re: The Inverse Square Law explained Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-29 13:08 -0800
                Re: The Inverse Square Law explained alsor@interia.pl - 2015-12-29 15:19 -0800
                Re: The Inverse Square Law explained David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2015-12-29 17:13 -0800
                Re: The Inverse Square Law explained David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2015-12-29 17:16 -0800
                Re: The Inverse Square Law explained alsor@interia.pl - 2015-12-31 05:31 -0800
      Re: The Inverse Square Law explained John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-01 18:28 -0800
        Re: The Inverse Square Law explained Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-01-02 23:48 +0100

csiph-web