Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test

From	moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Newsgroups	sci.math, sci.physics
Subject	Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test
Date	2019-03-05 17:13 +0000
Organization	The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989
Message-ID	<q5mao8$9o9$1@pcls7.std.com> (permalink)
References	(6 earlier) <0a7214a5-503b-4ead-8ef8-e32321381088@googlegroups.com> <a89097e4-07bd-4d83-b693-ad63a59d6efc@googlegroups.com> <e3184429-0bbc-4164-b292-56b974f10d1c@googlegroups.com> <ca5a6700-ac76-434b-8fa6-4db4f0e28c91@googlegroups.com> <e6b98aea-8edf-4259-8565-fe75cd984a92@googlegroups.com>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

AlzheimerPlutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails at math and science:

>AP writes: Moroney round the clock stalking

So that's what you are doing by spamming that "song"?  You are stalking me
around the clock?



x-no-archive: yes

Back to sci.math | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

I believe this proof does not even worry about a proof of Generalized FLT 1.2-AP's one paragraph proof of Regular FLT, using Generalized FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 20:17 -0800
  yes, I believe this proof does not even worry about a proof of Generalized FLT Re:-AP's one paragraph proof of Regular FLT, using Generalized FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 20:22 -0800
    Re: yes, I believe this proof does not even worry about a proof of Generalized FLT Re:-AP's one paragraph proof of Regular FLT, using Generalized FLT eastside.erik@gmail.com - 2019-03-03 20:41 -0800
    Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-03-04 07:41 +0000
    yes, I believe this proof does not even worry about a proof of Generalized FLT Re:-AP's one paragraph proof of Regular FLT, using Generalized FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-04 07:44 -0800
      Re: yes, I believe this proof does not even worry about a proof of Generalized FLT Re:-AP's one paragraph proof of Regular FLT, using Generalized FLT eastside.erik@gmail.com - 2019-03-04 08:10 -0800
      Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-03-04 16:38 +0000
      proof Re: yes, I believe this proof does not even worry about a proof of Generalized FLT Re:-AP's one paragraph proof of Regular FLT, using Generalized FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-04 13:52 -0800
        Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-03-04 22:45 +0000
        Re: proof Re: yes, I believe this proof does not even worry about a proof of Generalized FLT Re:-AP's one paragraph proof of Regular FLT, using Generalized FLT eastside.erik@gmail.com - 2019-03-04 14:50 -0800
        Re: proof Re: yes, I believe this proof does not even worry about a proof of Generalized FLT Re:-AP's one paragraph proof of Regular FLT, using Generalized FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-04 18:33 -0800
          Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-03-05 02:41 +0000
          Re: proof Re: yes, I believe this proof does not even worry about a proof of Generalized FLT Re:-AP's one paragraph proof of Regular FLT, using Generalized FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-04 21:17 -0800
            Re: proof Re: yes, I believe this proof does not even worry about a proof of Generalized FLT Re:-AP's one paragraph proof of Regular FLT, using Generalized FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-04 21:39 -0800
              Re: proof Re: yes, I believe this proof does not even worry about a proof of Generalized FLT Re:-AP's one paragraph proof of Regular FLT, using Generalized FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-05 00:20 -0800
                Re: proof Re: yes, I believe this proof does not even worry about a proof of Generalized FLT Re:-AP's one paragraph proof of Regular FLT, using Generalized FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-05 00:40 -0800
                Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-03-05 12:02 +0000
                Re: proof Re: yes, I believe this proof does not even worry about a proof of Generalized FLT Re:-AP's one paragraph proof of Regular FLT, using Generalized FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-05 08:57 -0800
                Re: proof Re: yes, I believe this proof does not even worry about a proof of Generalized FLT Re:-AP's one paragraph proof of Regular FLT, using Generalized FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-05 09:27 -0800
                looking for this special one axiom Re:-AP's one paragraph proof of Regular FLT, using Generalized FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-05 13:09 -0800
                Re: looking for this special one axiom Re:-AP's one paragraph proof of Regular FLT, using Generalized FLT eastside.erik@gmail.com - 2019-03-05 13:20 -0800
                Re: looking for this special one axiom Re:-AP's one paragraph proof of Regular FLT, using Generalized FLT konyberg <konyberg@online.no> - 2019-03-05 13:23 -0800
                Re: looking for this special one axiom Re:-AP's one paragraph proof of Regular FLT, using Generalized FLT konyberg <konyberg@online.no> - 2019-03-05 13:41 -0800
                k*6*k*6 + k*8*k*8 = k*10*k*10 but not k*2*k*2*k*2 + k*2*k*2*k*2 =/= k*2*k*2*k*2*k*2 Re: looking for this special one axiom or theorem derived from axioms Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-05 14:24 -0800
                Re: k*6*k*6 + k*8*k*8 = k*10*k*10 but not k*2*k*2*k*2 + k*2*k*2*k*2 =/= k*2*k*2*k*2*k*2 Re: looking for this special one axiom or theorem derived from axioms eastside.erik@gmail.com - 2019-03-05 14:36 -0800
                Re: proof Re: yes, I believe this proof does not even worry about a proof of Generalized FLT Re:-AP's one paragraph proof of Regular FLT, using Generalized FLT eastside.erik@gmail.com - 2019-03-05 09:54 -0800
                Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-03-05 17:13 +0000

csiph-web