Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.math |
| Subject | Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test |
| Date | 2019-03-05 12:02 +0000 |
| Organization | The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989 |
| Message-ID | <q5log8$v5u$1@pcls7.std.com> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <98e003d8-9165-4c04-b039-3ad9286f5895@googlegroups.com> <0a7214a5-503b-4ead-8ef8-e32321381088@googlegroups.com> <a89097e4-07bd-4d83-b693-ad63a59d6efc@googlegroups.com> <e3184429-0bbc-4164-b292-56b974f10d1c@googlegroups.com> <ca5a6700-ac76-434b-8fa6-4db4f0e28c91@googlegroups.com> |
Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails: >Subject: Re: proof Re: yes, I believe this proof does not even worry about a proof of Generalized FLT Re:-AP's one paragraph proof of Regular FLT, using Generalized FLT >>One of the axioms is to retain equality every tern must be multiplied by >the constant factor k. >Another axiom is that mixed exponents does not retain equality once multiplied by constant factor k. >A important definition is in 6^2 the 6 is called the base while 2 is exponent or power. >I will use these two equations to guide. >6^2 + 8^2 = 10^2 >And >2^3 + 2^3 = 2^4 >If FLT is having a solution it must come from Generalized FLT. >If FLT has a solution it has an infinite number of solutions since we can have k times the Bases by axiom of equality. Thank you for requesting another Babble-o-meter Calculation! ☑ Archie reposts the same old, same old, yet again... ☑ ...and again and again... ☑ ...and again and again... ☑ ...posted enough times to be classified as spam... ☑ ...Post has no new content, in fact... ☐ ...Archie's spam complains about other spammers or babblers... ☑ ...Purpose of post is to remain #1 Front Page Hog... ☐ .....meanwhile, Archie complains of some other "Front Page Hog"... ☐ ...Post posted in the wrong topic... ☐ .....and to the wrong newsgroup... ☐ ...Author awards self Nobel Prize/claims he should be so awarded... ☐ .....Author rejects self-awarded Nobel, real awardees don't deserve it... ☐ ...Author sour grapes Nobel or other science/math prize... ☑ ...Post has science or math 100% made up from whole cloth... ☑ ...Post's science/math based on earlier whole cloth science/math... ☑ .....which was based on even earlier whole cloth science/math... ☑ .....which was, oh never mind... ☑ ...Post contains The Truth because Archie said it is true... ☐ ...Phrases such as "Old Science" (actual science) and "New Science (babbling of author)... ☑ ...One word: Logorrhea... ☑ ...Another word: Graphomania... ☐ ...Author thinks cutting up magazines disproves actual math proofs... ☑ ...Author thinks a bad dream is an excellent basis for physics... ☑ ...Archie doesn't understand Usenet, not even after 26+ years... ☐ ...Archie asks Google Groups to do something they can't do... ☑ ...Archie even thinks Google runs Usenet... ☑ .....even though Archie used Usenet even before there even was a Google... ☑ ...Archie won't engage in discussion in a discussion group... ☐ ...Writes "Keep out of my threads!"... ☐ ...Archie demands professors resign for not teaching his broken math... ☐ ...Post includes a stalker list of physics and/or math professors... ☐ ...Archie outwitted by someone too stoopid to come out of the rain AGAIN... ☑ ...Archie can't get over the shame of messing up percentages... ☑ ....he even still thinks 8.88 is "exactly" 9... ☐ ....and he thinks 16.81 is "spot on" 17... ☐ ...Archie is envious that I weighed the electron and he didn't... ☐ ...Post includes the dumb ascii art cat/owl thing... ☐ ...Post contains ascii art of Archie's butthole... ☐ ...and Archie doesn't realize ascii art is so 1980s... ☐ ...Archie tries to involve totally uninvolved people... ☐ .....with a subject about flunking a nonexistent test no one ever took... ☐ .....but has no clue they will never see his post... ☐ .....and has no clue they probably don't know what Usenet is... ☐ .....he expects them to have power/authority they simply don't... ☑ ...Too stoopid to realize attack posts just produce more posts like this... ☑ ...Google Groups poster. 'Nuf said. Archie's Babbling Nonsense score: 22 plutoniums!
Back to sci.math | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
I believe this proof does not even worry about a proof of Generalized FLT 1.2-AP's one paragraph proof of Regular FLT, using Generalized FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 20:17 -0800
yes, I believe this proof does not even worry about a proof of Generalized FLT Re:-AP's one paragraph proof of Regular FLT, using Generalized FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 20:22 -0800
Re: yes, I believe this proof does not even worry about a proof of Generalized FLT Re:-AP's one paragraph proof of Regular FLT, using Generalized FLT eastside.erik@gmail.com - 2019-03-03 20:41 -0800
Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-03-04 07:41 +0000
yes, I believe this proof does not even worry about a proof of Generalized FLT Re:-AP's one paragraph proof of Regular FLT, using Generalized FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-04 07:44 -0800
Re: yes, I believe this proof does not even worry about a proof of Generalized FLT Re:-AP's one paragraph proof of Regular FLT, using Generalized FLT eastside.erik@gmail.com - 2019-03-04 08:10 -0800
Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-03-04 16:38 +0000
proof Re: yes, I believe this proof does not even worry about a proof of Generalized FLT Re:-AP's one paragraph proof of Regular FLT, using Generalized FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-04 13:52 -0800
Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-03-04 22:45 +0000
Re: proof Re: yes, I believe this proof does not even worry about a proof of Generalized FLT Re:-AP's one paragraph proof of Regular FLT, using Generalized FLT eastside.erik@gmail.com - 2019-03-04 14:50 -0800
Re: proof Re: yes, I believe this proof does not even worry about a proof of Generalized FLT Re:-AP's one paragraph proof of Regular FLT, using Generalized FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-04 18:33 -0800
Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-03-05 02:41 +0000
Re: proof Re: yes, I believe this proof does not even worry about a proof of Generalized FLT Re:-AP's one paragraph proof of Regular FLT, using Generalized FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-04 21:17 -0800
Re: proof Re: yes, I believe this proof does not even worry about a proof of Generalized FLT Re:-AP's one paragraph proof of Regular FLT, using Generalized FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-04 21:39 -0800
Re: proof Re: yes, I believe this proof does not even worry about a proof of Generalized FLT Re:-AP's one paragraph proof of Regular FLT, using Generalized FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-05 00:20 -0800
Re: proof Re: yes, I believe this proof does not even worry about a proof of Generalized FLT Re:-AP's one paragraph proof of Regular FLT, using Generalized FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-05 00:40 -0800
Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-03-05 12:02 +0000
Re: proof Re: yes, I believe this proof does not even worry about a proof of Generalized FLT Re:-AP's one paragraph proof of Regular FLT, using Generalized FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-05 08:57 -0800
Re: proof Re: yes, I believe this proof does not even worry about a proof of Generalized FLT Re:-AP's one paragraph proof of Regular FLT, using Generalized FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-05 09:27 -0800
looking for this special one axiom Re:-AP's one paragraph proof of Regular FLT, using Generalized FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-05 13:09 -0800
Re: looking for this special one axiom Re:-AP's one paragraph proof of Regular FLT, using Generalized FLT eastside.erik@gmail.com - 2019-03-05 13:20 -0800
Re: looking for this special one axiom Re:-AP's one paragraph proof of Regular FLT, using Generalized FLT konyberg <konyberg@online.no> - 2019-03-05 13:23 -0800
Re: looking for this special one axiom Re:-AP's one paragraph proof of Regular FLT, using Generalized FLT konyberg <konyberg@online.no> - 2019-03-05 13:41 -0800
k*6*k*6 + k*8*k*8 = k*10*k*10 but not k*2*k*2*k*2 + k*2*k*2*k*2 =/= k*2*k*2*k*2*k*2 Re: looking for this special one axiom or theorem derived from axioms Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-05 14:24 -0800
Re: k*6*k*6 + k*8*k*8 = k*10*k*10 but not k*2*k*2*k*2 + k*2*k*2*k*2 =/= k*2*k*2*k*2*k*2 Re: looking for this special one axiom or theorem derived from axioms eastside.erik@gmail.com - 2019-03-05 14:36 -0800
Re: proof Re: yes, I believe this proof does not even worry about a proof of Generalized FLT Re:-AP's one paragraph proof of Regular FLT, using Generalized FLT eastside.erik@gmail.com - 2019-03-05 09:54 -0800
Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-03-05 17:13 +0000
csiph-web