Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.math > #436308

Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test

Show all headers | View raw

Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails:

>Of course the argument I used in my proof of Regular FLT was use the fact 

WARNING TO PARENTS: Archimedes Plutonium is offering to teach your children
his broken math. BEWARE! He will corrupt the minds of your children! He
teaches there are no negative numbers, no complex numbers, he teaches a
sine wave isn't a sine wave plus many, many other instances of bad math.
In addition, he loves to teach false Boolean logic such as 3 AND 2 = 5.
His method at doing this is particularly insidious. He'll post a false
statement that nobody believes, such as 3 OR 2 = 5, say that it is false,
but then he'll try to replace it with another similar false statement such
as 3 AND 2 = 5, in order to really confuse future computer scientists.

Also, Plutonium is known to attempt to Brainwash young children by including
several pages of nothing except one of his lies repeated over and over.

Nobody knows why he wishes to corrupt the minds of children like this.
Perhaps he wants everyone to be a failure at math, just like he is.
Perhaps he is an agent of Putin and Russia, or maybe of China, in order
to make sure they will continue to dominate the trade economy. But the
point is, stay away, if he offers to give or sell you his dangerous book!

In addition, Plutonium wants to usurp good Christians by trying to convince
students to worship his evil pagan Plutonium atom god. You can recognize
the symbol of this evil pagan cult, which is an ascii-art cosmic butthole.


x-no-archive: yes 

Back to sci.math | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

I believe this proof does not even worry about a proof of Generalized FLT 1.2-AP's one paragraph proof of Regular FLT, using Generalized FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 20:17 -0800
  yes, I believe this proof does not even worry about a proof of Generalized FLT Re:-AP's one paragraph proof of Regular FLT, using Generalized FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 20:22 -0800
    Re: yes, I believe this proof does not even worry about a proof of Generalized FLT Re:-AP's one paragraph proof of Regular FLT, using Generalized FLT eastside.erik@gmail.com - 2019-03-03 20:41 -0800
    Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-03-04 07:41 +0000
    yes, I believe this proof does not even worry about a proof of Generalized FLT Re:-AP's one paragraph proof of Regular FLT, using Generalized FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-04 07:44 -0800
      Re: yes, I believe this proof does not even worry about a proof of Generalized FLT Re:-AP's one paragraph proof of Regular FLT, using Generalized FLT eastside.erik@gmail.com - 2019-03-04 08:10 -0800
      Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-03-04 16:38 +0000
      proof Re: yes, I believe this proof does not even worry about a proof of Generalized FLT Re:-AP's one paragraph proof of Regular FLT, using Generalized FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-04 13:52 -0800
        Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-03-04 22:45 +0000
        Re: proof Re: yes, I believe this proof does not even worry about a proof of Generalized FLT Re:-AP's one paragraph proof of Regular FLT, using Generalized FLT eastside.erik@gmail.com - 2019-03-04 14:50 -0800
        Re: proof Re: yes, I believe this proof does not even worry about a proof of Generalized FLT Re:-AP's one paragraph proof of Regular FLT, using Generalized FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-04 18:33 -0800
          Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-03-05 02:41 +0000
          Re: proof Re: yes, I believe this proof does not even worry about a proof of Generalized FLT Re:-AP's one paragraph proof of Regular FLT, using Generalized FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-04 21:17 -0800
            Re: proof Re: yes, I believe this proof does not even worry about a proof of Generalized FLT Re:-AP's one paragraph proof of Regular FLT, using Generalized FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-04 21:39 -0800
              Re: proof Re: yes, I believe this proof does not even worry about a proof of Generalized FLT Re:-AP's one paragraph proof of Regular FLT, using Generalized FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-05 00:20 -0800
                Re: proof Re: yes, I believe this proof does not even worry about a proof of Generalized FLT Re:-AP's one paragraph proof of Regular FLT, using Generalized FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-05 00:40 -0800
                Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-03-05 12:02 +0000
                Re: proof Re: yes, I believe this proof does not even worry about a proof of Generalized FLT Re:-AP's one paragraph proof of Regular FLT, using Generalized FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-05 08:57 -0800
                Re: proof Re: yes, I believe this proof does not even worry about a proof of Generalized FLT Re:-AP's one paragraph proof of Regular FLT, using Generalized FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-05 09:27 -0800
                looking for this special one axiom Re:-AP's one paragraph proof of Regular FLT, using Generalized FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-05 13:09 -0800
                Re: looking for this special one axiom Re:-AP's one paragraph proof of Regular FLT, using Generalized FLT eastside.erik@gmail.com - 2019-03-05 13:20 -0800
                Re: looking for this special one axiom Re:-AP's one paragraph proof of Regular FLT, using Generalized FLT konyberg <konyberg@online.no> - 2019-03-05 13:23 -0800
                Re: looking for this special one axiom Re:-AP's one paragraph proof of Regular FLT, using Generalized FLT konyberg <konyberg@online.no> - 2019-03-05 13:41 -0800
                k*6*k*6 + k*8*k*8 = k*10*k*10 but not k*2*k*2*k*2 + k*2*k*2*k*2 =/= k*2*k*2*k*2*k*2 Re: looking for this special one axiom or theorem derived from axioms Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-05 14:24 -0800
                Re: k*6*k*6 + k*8*k*8 = k*10*k*10 but not k*2*k*2*k*2 + k*2*k*2*k*2 =/= k*2*k*2*k*2*k*2 Re: looking for this special one axiom or theorem derived from axioms eastside.erik@gmail.com - 2019-03-05 14:36 -0800
                Re: proof Re: yes, I believe this proof does not even worry about a proof of Generalized FLT Re:-AP's one paragraph proof of Regular FLT, using Generalized FLT eastside.erik@gmail.com - 2019-03-05 09:54 -0800
                Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-03-05 17:13 +0000

csiph-web