Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.image.processing > #4505

Re: tag for edited file

From "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid>
Newsgroups rec.photo.digital, sci.engr.color, sci.image.processing
Subject Re: tag for edited file
Date 2020-07-21 15:03 +0200
Message-ID <bl5jug-11o.ln1@Telcontar.valinor> (permalink)
References <dapqa1.90u.19.1@news.alt.net> <s8m9ug-lu3.ln1@Telcontar.valinor> <180720201137364907%nospam@nospam.invalid>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


On 18/07/2020 17.37, nospam wrote:
> In article <s8m9ug-lu3.ln1@Telcontar.valinor>, Carlos E.R.
> <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
> 
>> On 17/07/2020 23.21, dale wrote:
>>> What about a tag in an image file indicating it is not the original?
>>
>> And how would you mandate it being obeyed?
> 
> the bigger problem is preventing its removal.
> 
> the correct way to indicate an image original and never modified is to
> cryptographically sign it, which is what some cameras do.

Interesting.

> 
>>> Taking it further, what about including each edited image in the file?
>>
>> making the file huge.
> 
> only if done incorrectly.

No way. Say the original is 10 Mb. Each modification saved is another 10 Mb.


> 
>> However, that's an history file. The Gimp saves images that way, undo works.
> 
> saving the undo history in the image is silly. is that gimp's lame
> attempt at non-destructive editing because they refuse to do it
> correctly? if so, that's laughable.

Ha ha. They are doing it correctly. You are biased.


-- 
Cheers, Carlos.

Back to sci.image.processing | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

tag for edited file dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2020-07-17 17:21 -0400
  Re: tag for edited file "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2020-07-18 00:45 +0200
    Re: tag for edited file nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-18 11:37 -0400
      Re: tag for edited file "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2020-07-21 15:03 +0200
        Re: tag for edited file nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-21 10:13 -0400
          Re: tag for edited file "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2020-07-21 21:33 +0200
            Re: tag for edited file nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-21 18:45 -0400
  Re: tag for edited file Martin Brown <'''newspam'''@nezumi.demon.co.uk> - 2020-07-18 16:34 +0100
  Re: tag for edited file dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2020-07-23 15:54 -0400
    Re: tag for edited file nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-23 16:04 -0400

csiph-web