Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.image.processing > #4508

Re: tag for edited file

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

In article <khsjug-d9t.ln1@Telcontar.valinor>, Carlos E.R.
<robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:

> >>>>> Taking it further, what about including each edited image in the file?
> >>>>
> >>>> making the file huge.
> >>>
> >>> only if done incorrectly.
> >>
> >> No way. Say the original is 10 Mb. Each modification saved is another 10
> >> Mb.
> > 
> > that's doing it incorrectly.
> > 
> > the correct way to do it is by saving an edit list and replay it, not
> > saving a version of the entire image each time.
> 
> That's not what the OP said, 

he initially wanted a way to confirm that a photo had not been altered,
and the only way to do that is by signing it.

he mentioned including a snapshot at every step. that's a bad idea for
all sorts of reasons.

> and needs having the same application for 
> replaying the steps.

not an issue, and other compatible apps can work. 

> >>>> However, that's an history file. The Gimp saves images that way, undo
> >>>> works.
> >>>
> >>> saving the undo history in the image is silly. is that gimp's lame
> >>> attempt at non-destructive editing because they refuse to do it
> >>> correctly? if so, that's laughable.
> >>
> >> Ha ha. They are doing it correctly. You are biased.
> > 
> > nope. they aren't doing it at all and have no immediate plans to do so.
> > 
> > they now claim that it might be added in version 3.2 (a change from
> > their previous claim which was a flat 'no'), except they haven't
> > figured out how to do it, according to their own road map.
> > 
> > the gimp is a toy, lacking features photoshop had 30 years ago and
> > *significantly* slower on the same hardware.
> 
> Ha ha.

read their roadmap and do some comparisons.

Back to sci.image.processing | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

tag for edited file dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2020-07-17 17:21 -0400
  Re: tag for edited file "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2020-07-18 00:45 +0200
    Re: tag for edited file nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-18 11:37 -0400
      Re: tag for edited file "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2020-07-21 15:03 +0200
        Re: tag for edited file nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-21 10:13 -0400
          Re: tag for edited file "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2020-07-21 21:33 +0200
            Re: tag for edited file nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-21 18:45 -0400
  Re: tag for edited file Martin Brown <'''newspam'''@nezumi.demon.co.uk> - 2020-07-18 16:34 +0100
  Re: tag for edited file dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2020-07-23 15:54 -0400
    Re: tag for edited file nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-23 16:04 -0400

csiph-web