Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > rec.photo.digital > #235362
| From | "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital, sci.engr.color, sci.image.processing |
| Subject | Re: tag for edited file |
| Date | 2020-07-21 15:03 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <bl5jug-11o.ln1@Telcontar.valinor> (permalink) |
| References | <dapqa1.90u.19.1@news.alt.net> <s8m9ug-lu3.ln1@Telcontar.valinor> <180720201137364907%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
On 18/07/2020 17.37, nospam wrote: > In article <s8m9ug-lu3.ln1@Telcontar.valinor>, Carlos E.R. > <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote: > >> On 17/07/2020 23.21, dale wrote: >>> What about a tag in an image file indicating it is not the original? >> >> And how would you mandate it being obeyed? > > the bigger problem is preventing its removal. > > the correct way to indicate an image original and never modified is to > cryptographically sign it, which is what some cameras do. Interesting. > >>> Taking it further, what about including each edited image in the file? >> >> making the file huge. > > only if done incorrectly. No way. Say the original is 10 Mb. Each modification saved is another 10 Mb. > >> However, that's an history file. The Gimp saves images that way, undo works. > > saving the undo history in the image is silly. is that gimp's lame > attempt at non-destructive editing because they refuse to do it > correctly? if so, that's laughable. Ha ha. They are doing it correctly. You are biased. -- Cheers, Carlos.
Back to rec.photo.digital | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
tag for edited file dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2020-07-17 17:21 -0400
Re: tag for edited file "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2020-07-18 00:45 +0200
Re: tag for edited file nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-18 11:37 -0400
Re: tag for edited file "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2020-07-21 15:03 +0200
Re: tag for edited file nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-21 10:13 -0400
Re: tag for edited file "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2020-07-21 21:33 +0200
Re: tag for edited file nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-21 18:45 -0400
Re: tag for edited file Martin Brown <'''newspam'''@nezumi.demon.co.uk> - 2020-07-18 16:34 +0100
Re: tag for edited file dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2020-07-23 15:54 -0400
Re: tag for edited file nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-23 16:04 -0400
csiph-web