Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.image.processing > #4382
| Path | csiph.com!xmission!news.alt.net |
|---|---|
| From | dale <dale@dalekelly.org> |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital, sci.engr.color, sci.image.processing |
| Subject | Re: ICC profile for a light box |
| Date | Tue, 31 Jul 2018 11:59:39 -0400 |
| Lines | 32 |
| Message-ID | <bfmmid.gre.17.1@news.alt.net> (permalink) |
| References | <bf67c8.j34.17.1@news.alt.net> <250720180738159630%nospam@nospam.invalid> <bfkter.30v.19.1@news.alt.net> <0001HW.210FE5460028FC0270000C8932CF@news.giganews.com> <0001HW.210FE5DC00291F0B70000C8932CF@news.giganews.com> <bfl4oa.9ei.19.3@news.alt.net> <300720182157009140%nospam@nospam.invalid> <bfm11i.dud.17.2@news.alt.net> <0001HW.2110954600523BA87000010092CF@news.giganews.com> <bfmffe.s4a.17.1@news.alt.net> <bfmhal.kq4.17.1@news.alt.net> <0001HW.2110ADDA0057FE517000010092CF@news.giganews.com> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 |
| In-Reply-To | <0001HW.2110ADDA0057FE517000010092CF@news.giganews.com> |
| Content-Language | en-US |
| Xref | csiph.com rec.photo.digital:219832 sci.engr.color:1143 sci.image.processing:4382 |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
Show key headers only | View raw
On 7/31/2018 10:46 AM, Savageduck wrote: > On Jul 31, 2018, dale wrote > (in article <bfmhal.kq4.17.1@news.alt.net>): > >> On 7/31/2018 9:58 AM, dale wrote: >>>> CIECAM02 is a color model. >>> >>> it is a color "appearance" model >> >> a model is not an application, I would apply CIECAM with an LMS profile >> connection space, that way you could have viewing/appearance "relevant" >> conditions in/out of LMS from XYZ, uvL, CIELAB, etc. then through an >> "absolute" profiles to/from images in the viewing environments > > I am still curious as to your particular need for all this exploration into > profiles. I know that I maintain a color managed workflow starting with a > calibrated display, and camera/lens profiles. That gets extended into > printing where I use paper/printer specific icc profiles together with soft > proofing to get the best print results I can produce. > > I still have no idea if you are a photographer struggling with a workflow, a > designer working with fabrics, an advertising exec, or somebody in the print > industry. > used to do development of these types of systems, over 20 years ago, and now like to see where they are at, I keep up a resume just in case something comes up, it is under "images" on the website in my signature -- dale - https://www.dalekelly.org/ Not a professional opinion unless specified.
Back to sci.image.processing | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
ICC profile for a light box dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2018-07-25 06:02 -0400
Re: ICC profile for a light box nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-25 07:38 -0400
Re: ICC profile for a light box dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2018-07-25 08:33 -0400
Re: ICC profile for a light box nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-25 11:21 -0400
Re: ICC profile for a light box Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> - 2018-07-26 12:43 +1200
Re: ICC profile for a light box dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2018-07-30 19:44 -0400
Re: ICC profile for a light box Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2018-07-30 17:31 -0700
Re: ICC profile for a light box Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2018-07-30 17:33 -0700
Re: ICC profile for a light box dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2018-07-30 21:49 -0400
Re: ICC profile for a light box nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-30 21:57 -0400
Re: ICC profile for a light box dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2018-07-31 05:52 -0400
Re: ICC profile for a light box Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2018-07-31 06:01 -0700
Re: ICC profile for a light box dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2018-07-31 09:58 -0400
Re: ICC profile for a light box nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-31 10:06 -0400
Re: ICC profile for a light box dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2018-07-31 10:22 -0400
Re: ICC profile for a light box dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2018-07-31 10:30 -0400
Re: ICC profile for a light box Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2018-07-31 07:46 -0700
Re: ICC profile for a light box dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2018-07-31 11:59 -0400
Re: ICC profile for a light box dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2018-07-31 20:35 -0400
Re: ICC profile for a light box Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> - 2018-08-01 12:24 +1200
Re: ICC profile for a light box Martin Brown <'''newspam'''@nezumi.demon.co.uk> - 2018-08-02 09:54 +0100
Re: ICC profile for a light box dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2018-08-02 15:48 -0400
Re: ICC profile for a light box dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2018-08-05 14:31 -0400
Re: ICC profile for a light box Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2018-07-30 19:07 -0700
Re: ICC profile for a light box dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2018-07-31 05:51 -0400
Re: ICC profile for a light box dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2018-07-30 21:45 -0400
Re: ICC profile for a light box nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-30 21:46 -0400
Re: ICC profile for a light box dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2018-07-31 05:52 -0400
Re: ICC profile for a light box dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2018-07-31 07:07 -0400
Re: ICC profile for a light box PeterN <"peter,newdelete"@deleteverizon.net> - 2018-08-02 18:28 -0400
Re: ICC profile for a light box nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-30 21:31 -0400
Re: ICC profile for a light box dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2018-07-30 21:47 -0400
Re: ICC profile for a light box Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> - 2018-08-01 12:28 +1200
Re: ICC profile for a light box nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-31 20:59 -0400
csiph-web