Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.electronics.design > #452530
| From | Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.electronics.design |
| Subject | Re: bad, better delay circuits |
| Date | 2017-03-18 19:08 -0700 |
| Organization | Rowland Institute |
| Message-ID | <oakp6l02600@drn.newsguy.com> (permalink) |
| References | <1roqcclua35sdrn6jduc9q0folr3fg8oqu@4ax.com> <oak1qk0un7@drn.newsguy.com> <md4rcc5c7q0oqqgrang2q66rtoeljahtth@4ax.com> |
John Larkin wrote...
>
> Winfield Hill wrote:
>>
>> In another case, used 74LVC1G125 or 126 to
>> discharge the cap, that worked even better.
>> Ground logic input, control with OE pin.
>
> That's interesting; we have those. Prop delay
> is not going to beat a schottky diode!
Yes, but very surprisingly-node capacitance.
--
Thanks,
- Win
Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
bad, better delay circuits John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-03-18 10:04 -0700
Re: bad, better delay circuits Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2017-03-18 12:29 -0700
Re: bad, better delay circuits John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-03-18 16:15 -0700
Re: bad, better delay circuits Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2017-03-18 19:08 -0700
Re: bad, better delay circuits "Tim Williams" <tiwill@seventransistorlabs.com> - 2017-03-18 17:02 -0500
Re: bad, better delay circuits John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-03-18 16:25 -0700
Re: bad, better delay circuits rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-18 19:40 -0400
Re: bad, better delay circuits dagmargoodboat@yahoo.com - 2017-03-19 10:42 -0700
Re: bad, better delay circuits John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-03-19 15:37 -0700
Re: bad, better delay circuits "Tim Williams" <tiwill@seventransistorlabs.com> - 2017-03-19 22:24 -0500
Re: bad, better delay circuits dagmargoodboat@yahoo.com - 2017-03-20 08:58 -0700
Re: bad, better delay circuits John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-03-20 09:42 -0700
Re: bad, better delay circuits Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2017-03-20 23:55 -0800
Re: bad, better delay circuits "Tim Williams" <tiwill@seventransistorlabs.com> - 2017-03-21 00:46 -0500
Re: bad, better delay circuits bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-03-21 22:54 -0700
Re: bad, better delay circuits "Tim Williams" <tiwill@seventransistorlabs.com> - 2017-03-22 02:10 -0500
Re: bad, better delay circuits rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-19 18:47 -0400
Re: bad, better delay circuits Clifford Heath <no.spam@please.net> - 2017-03-20 09:55 +1100
Re: bad, better delay circuits John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-03-19 16:12 -0700
Re: bad, better delay circuits "Tim Williams" <tiwill@seventransistorlabs.com> - 2017-03-19 10:32 -0500
Re: bad, better delay circuits Clifford Heath <no.spam@please.net> - 2017-03-19 13:36 +1100
Re: bad, better delay circuits John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-03-18 19:44 -0700
Re: bad, better delay circuits Clifford Heath <no.spam@please.net> - 2017-03-19 15:58 +1100
Re: bad, better delay circuits John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-03-19 15:43 -0700
Re: bad, better delay circuits Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2017-03-19 17:54 -0700
Re: bad, better delay circuits Clifford Heath <no.spam@please.net> - 2017-03-20 12:44 +1100
Re: bad, better delay circuits Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2017-03-20 12:22 -0700
Re: bad, better delay circuits John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-03-20 15:49 -0700
Re: bad, better delay circuits whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-18 23:51 -0700
Re: bad, better delay circuits John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-03-19 08:22 -0700
Re: bad, better delay circuits George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> - 2017-03-20 17:55 -0700
Re: bad, better delay circuits John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-03-22 08:54 -0700
Re: bad, better delay circuits JM <dontreplytothis173@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 16:02 +0000
Re: bad, better delay circuits John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-03-22 09:47 -0700
Re: bad, better delay circuits Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2017-03-22 10:31 -0700
Re: bad, better delay circuits John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-03-22 10:52 -0700
csiph-web