Groups > sci.electronics.design > #446517

Re: Blocking RF from intentional radiators

Path	csiph.com!aioe.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid>
Newsgroups	sci.electronics.design
Subject	Re: Blocking RF from intentional radiators
Date	Mon, 6 Feb 2017 17:06:18 -0700
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Lines	46
Message-ID	<o7b2ug$ooc$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	<o7996i$3j6$1@dont-email.me> <o79o8s$lq9$1@dont-email.me> <o79v02$dig$1@dont-email.me> <jg3h9cl6qf0931uujhcc27n481ekj8rvh1@4ax.com> <o7aj8t$s67$1@dont-email.me> <JtGdndyW17ljRAXFnZ2dnUU7-fednZ2d@giganews.com> <o7aqbi$p5n$1@dont-email.me> <sbednXsI7NuNnwTFnZ2dnUU7-L_NnZ2d@giganews.com>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
Injection-Date	Tue, 7 Feb 2017 00:04:43 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info	mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="871ad573714350337df2b5ea6232d383"; logging-data="25356"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1//BokE6qCPXsQakzUJdaWX"
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0
In-Reply-To	<sbednXsI7NuNnwTFnZ2dnUU7-L_NnZ2d@giganews.com>
Cancel-Lock	sha1:2OXIzBEAigE2BRjqr8q2ezAW4FE=
Xref	csiph.com sci.electronics.design:446517

Show key headers only | View raw

On 2/6/2017 4:10 PM, Jon Elson wrote:

> I'm just guessing what you are trying to do.  If you want to TEMPORARILY
> disable the remote, that could be harder, if the unit was never designed
> with that in mind.

Exactly.  Who buys a remote controlled garage door opener and DOESN'T
want the remote feature operable?!

> You could rig an extension cord, and unplug it when you
> don't want the RF to work, but then you'd have to plug it in to run it

People would find that tedious.

> manually.  (Only good idea I can come up with is is an RF jammer, a little
> noise source placed right near the receiver, and plugged into a wall socket,
> when you want no remote control.)

This is the option that I am currently pursuing.  But, without knowing the
make/model of folks' GDO's, I can't be guaranteed to know the correct
frequencies, etc. to overload the front end.

So, my approach is to use the *existing* remote as the "jammer"! But, set
to a "different" code (this is problematic for learning controllers!  how
do you pick a different code for the REMOTE after telling the GDO your
*correct* code -- which is done by using the REMOTE?!), affix it to the
power head with the button locked in the depressed position.  I.e.,
continually broadcast the "wrong" code in such close proximity
to the receiver that the "correct" code could never be recognized.

[No idea how to guarantee this!  Guy up the street works for Chamberlain
so I will touch base with him to see if he can get me some of the inside
scoop]

But, the battery in the remote will quickly die (ok, grab phantom power
from the series connection to the wall mounted pushbutton to power
the transmitter, indefinitely).

And, the frequencies used are not licensed for "continuous transmission"
so I'm probably tempting fate with this as a final solution.

[But, I may learn enough from it to concoct a legitimate alternative
based on the same principles -- maybe at much lower power levels (to
fall below the licensing requirements) and direct connection to the
antenna lead...]

Thread

Blocking RF from intentional radiators Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2017-02-06 00:40 -0700
  Re: Blocking RF from intentional radiators whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com> - 2017-02-06 00:56 -0800
    Re: Blocking RF from intentional radiators Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2017-02-06 02:19 -0700
      Re: Blocking RF from intentional radiators Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2017-02-08 20:22 -0800
  Re: Blocking RF from intentional radiators piglet <erichpwagner@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-06 11:57 +0000
    Re: Blocking RF from intentional radiators "Tim Williams" <tiwill@seventransistorlabs.com> - 2017-02-06 06:51 -0600
    Re: Blocking RF from intentional radiators Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2017-02-06 06:52 -0700
      Re: Blocking RF from intentional radiators Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> - 2017-02-06 07:55 -0700
        Re: Blocking RF from intentional radiators Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2017-02-06 12:38 -0700
          Re: Blocking RF from intentional radiators Tim Wescott <seemywebsite@myfooter.really> - 2017-02-06 14:18 -0600
            Re: Blocking RF from intentional radiators Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2017-02-06 14:39 -0700
              Re: Blocking RF from intentional radiators Jon Elson <jmelson@wustl.edu> - 2017-02-06 17:10 -0600
                Re: Blocking RF from intentional radiators Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2017-02-06 17:06 -0700
                Re: Blocking RF from intentional radiators Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2017-02-07 04:12 +0000
              Re: Blocking RF from intentional radiators Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2017-02-07 04:05 +0000
          Re: Blocking RF from intentional radiators Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> - 2017-02-06 14:56 -0700
            Re: Blocking RF from intentional radiators Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2017-02-06 15:18 -0700
        Re: Blocking RF from intentional radiators Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2017-02-08 20:41 -0800
      Re: Blocking RF from intentional radiators Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2017-02-08 20:32 -0800
    Re: Blocking RF from intentional radiators Phil Allison <pallison49@gmail.com> - 2017-02-06 06:39 -0800
  Re: Blocking RF from intentional radiators John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-02-06 08:28 -0800
  Re: Blocking RF from intentional radiators Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> - 2017-02-06 09:23 -0800
    Re: Blocking RF from intentional radiators Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> - 2017-02-06 09:30 -0800
    Re: Blocking RF from intentional radiators Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2017-02-06 11:52 -0700
      Re: Blocking RF from intentional radiators Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> - 2017-02-06 11:31 -0800
        Re: Blocking RF from intentional radiators Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2017-02-06 12:49 -0700
          Re: Blocking RF from intentional radiators John S <Sophi.2@invalid.org> - 2017-02-06 14:07 -0600
          Re: Blocking RF from intentional radiators "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2017-02-06 12:09 -0800
            Re: Blocking RF from intentional radiators Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2017-02-06 13:37 -0700
              Re: Blocking RF from intentional radiators "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2017-02-06 14:35 -0800
                Re: Blocking RF from intentional radiators Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2017-02-06 15:59 -0700
          Re: Blocking RF from intentional radiators Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> - 2017-02-06 17:56 -0800
      Re: Blocking RF from intentional radiators George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> - 2017-02-06 12:03 -0800
        Re: Blocking RF from intentional radiators Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2017-02-06 13:31 -0700
          Re: Blocking RF from intentional radiators George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> - 2017-02-06 13:29 -0800
            Re: Blocking RF from intentional radiators Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> - 2017-02-06 13:32 -0800
            Re: Blocking RF from intentional radiators Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2017-02-06 15:01 -0700
              Re: Blocking RF from intentional radiators Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> - 2017-02-06 15:07 -0700
                Re: Blocking RF from intentional radiators Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2017-02-06 15:13 -0700
                Re: Blocking RF from intentional radiators Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> - 2017-02-06 14:28 -0800
                Re: Blocking RF from intentional radiators Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2017-02-06 15:31 -0700
                Re: Blocking RF from intentional radiators Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> - 2017-02-06 15:59 -0700
                Re: Blocking RF from intentional radiators Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2017-02-06 17:08 -0700
                Re: Blocking RF from intentional radiators pcdhobbs@gmail.com - 2017-02-08 16:36 -0800
                Re: Blocking RF from intentional radiators Clifford Heath <no.spam@please.net> - 2017-02-07 10:26 +1100
      Re: Blocking RF from intentional radiators whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com> - 2017-02-06 13:05 -0800
        Re: Blocking RF from intentional radiators Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2017-02-06 14:22 -0700
          Re: Blocking RF from intentional radiators kevin93 <kevin@whitedigs.com> - 2017-02-06 13:39 -0800
            Re: Blocking RF from intentional radiators Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2017-02-06 15:12 -0700
          Re: Blocking RF from intentional radiators whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com> - 2017-02-06 14:43 -0800
            Re: Blocking RF from intentional radiators "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2017-02-06 16:29 -0800
      Re: Blocking RF from intentional radiators Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2017-02-07 04:19 +0000

csiph-web