Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.electronics.design > #452212
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.electronics.design |
| Subject | Re: Parasitics? |
| Date | 2017-03-17 12:21 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <ej0s1jFngurU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <oaf7ro$efu$1@dont-email.me> |
On 17/03/2017 10:44 AM, rickman wrote: > I'm running a simulation where I'm pumping charge into a capacitor to > generate a voltage. A transistor emitter/source is connected to the > positive rail and the collector/drain is connected to a 1 nF cap through > a 47k resistor. When the base/gate is driven high to shut off the > current I see the current go up initially then taking almost 2 us to > shut off. I've tried 2N3906 and BSS84 and a couple others selected > randomly. The switching period is around 8 uS. > > Is this from the parasitic capacitance in the transistor? The BSS84 > only has 1 nC gate charge and still the effect is very pronounced. > > Is there a way to mitigate this effect other than using a larger cap and > smaller resistors? > When you try to drive the gate high, the gate-drain capacitance has to be charged, and the only way than can happen is for current to flow through R3. A back of the envelope calculation suggests that will take about the time you're seeing. To get it to switch more quickly, you need to reduce R3, or provide some other path for the current. A diode in series with R3, and a 1K resistor from the drain to ground improves things substantially. Sylvia.
Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Parasitics? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 19:44 -0400
Re: Parasitics? bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com - 2017-03-16 16:48 -0700
Re: Parasitics? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-03-17 10:59 +1100
Re: Parasitics? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 20:19 -0400
Re: Parasitics? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-03-17 12:21 +1100
Re: Parasitics? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 23:16 -0400
Re: Parasitics? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-03-17 14:51 +1100
Re: Parasitics? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-17 00:57 -0400
Re: Parasitics? bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com - 2017-03-18 01:36 -0700
Re: Parasitics? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-18 05:45 -0400
Re: Parasitics? bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com - 2017-03-18 06:33 -0700
Re: Parasitics? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-18 12:22 -0400
Re: Parasitics? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-03-24 13:30 +1100
Re: Parasitics? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-24 00:36 -0400
Re: Parasitics? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-03-24 16:10 +1100
Re: Parasitics? "Tim Williams" <tiwill@seventransistorlabs.com> - 2017-03-17 01:42 -0500
Re: Parasitics? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-17 04:11 -0400
Re: Parasitics? Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2017-03-17 09:53 -0400
Re: Parasitics? Cursitor Doom <curd@notformail.com> - 2017-03-17 18:52 +0000
csiph-web