Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1685643 > unrolled thread

[PATCH v2 4/4] Staging: Lustre Fix block statement style issue

Started byCraig Inches <Craig@craiginches.com>
First post2017-07-12 11:10 +0200
Last post2017-07-17 20:30 +0200
Articles 4 — 4 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  [PATCH v2 4/4] Staging: Lustre Fix block statement style issue Craig Inches <Craig@craiginches.com> - 2017-07-12 11:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] Staging: Lustre Fix block statement style issue "Dilger, Andreas" <andreas.dilger@intel.com> - 2017-07-17 19:50 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] Staging: Lustre Fix block statement style issue Craig Inches <craig@craiginches.com> - 2017-07-17 20:00 +0200
        Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] Staging: Lustre Fix block statement style issue Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2017-07-17 20:30 +0200

#1685643 — [PATCH v2 4/4] Staging: Lustre Fix block statement style issue

FromCraig Inches <Craig@craiginches.com>
Date2017-07-12 11:10 +0200
Subject[PATCH v2 4/4] Staging: Lustre Fix block statement style issue
Message-ID<u2lOF-6iL-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
This fixes a block statement which didnt end with */

Signed-off-by: Craig Inches <Craig@craiginches.com>
---
 drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/lnet/socklnd.h | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/lnet/socklnd.h b/drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/lnet/socklnd.h
index dd5bc0e46560..a1ae66ede7a8 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/lnet/socklnd.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/lnet/socklnd.h
@@ -76,7 +76,8 @@ struct ksock_msg {
 	__u64	ksm_zc_cookies[2];	/* Zero-Copy request/ACK cookie */
 	union {
 		struct ksock_lnet_msg lnetmsg; /* lnet message, it's empty if
-					  * it's NOOP */
+						* it's NOOP
+						*/
 	} WIRE_ATTR ksm_u;
 } WIRE_ATTR;
 
-- 
2.13.0

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1689303

From"Dilger, Andreas" <andreas.dilger@intel.com>
Date2017-07-17 19:50 +0200
Message-ID<u4ijE-85t-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1685643
On Jul 12, 2017, at 03:03, Craig Inches <craig@craiginches.com> wrote:
> 
> This fixes a block statement which didnt end with */
> 
> Signed-off-by: Craig Inches <Craig@craiginches.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/lnet/socklnd.h | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/lnet/socklnd.h b/drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/lnet/socklnd.h
> index dd5bc0e46560..a1ae66ede7a8 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/lnet/socklnd.h
> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/lnet/socklnd.h
> @@ -76,7 +76,8 @@ struct ksock_msg {
> 	__u64	ksm_zc_cookies[2];	/* Zero-Copy request/ACK cookie */
> 	union {
> 		struct ksock_lnet_msg lnetmsg; /* lnet message, it's empty if
> -					  * it's NOOP */
> +						* it's NOOP
> +						*/

Rather than making the multi-line comments even more space consuming (I'm not a big
fan of "*/ must be on a line by itself" since it wastes a lot of vertical space),
I'd prefer to just shorten the comment, if possible, like:

		struct ksock_lnet_msg lnetmsg; /* lnet message, empty if NOOP */

Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Lustre Principal Architect
Intel Corporation

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1689314

FromCraig Inches <craig@craiginches.com>
Date2017-07-17 20:00 +0200
Message-ID<u4itj-8aw-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1689303
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 05:44:59PM +0000, Dilger, Andreas wrote:
> On Jul 12, 2017, at 03:03, Craig Inches <craig@craiginches.com> wrote:
> > 
> > This fixes a block statement which didnt end with */
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Craig Inches <Craig@craiginches.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/lnet/socklnd.h | 3 ++-
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/lnet/socklnd.h b/drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/lnet/socklnd.h
> > index dd5bc0e46560..a1ae66ede7a8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/lnet/socklnd.h
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/lnet/socklnd.h
> > @@ -76,7 +76,8 @@ struct ksock_msg {
> > 	__u64	ksm_zc_cookies[2];	/* Zero-Copy request/ACK cookie */
> > 	union {
> > 		struct ksock_lnet_msg lnetmsg; /* lnet message, it's empty if
> > -					  * it's NOOP */
> > +						* it's NOOP
> > +						*/
> 
> Rather than making the multi-line comments even more space consuming (I'm not a big
> fan of "*/ must be on a line by itself" since it wastes a lot of vertical space),
> I'd prefer to just shorten the comment, if possible, like:
> 
> 		struct ksock_lnet_msg lnetmsg; /* lnet message, empty if NOOP */

That makes sense, I believe the series has already made it to
staging-next, so not sure what the process would be to fix it up.

I am doing another set of style fixes which I can include this change
aswell.

Cheers,

Craig

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1689339

FromDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Date2017-07-17 20:30 +0200
Message-ID<u4iWm-7E-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1689314
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 05:50:27PM +0000, Craig Inches wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 05:44:59PM +0000, Dilger, Andreas wrote:
> > On Jul 12, 2017, at 03:03, Craig Inches <craig@craiginches.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > This fixes a block statement which didnt end with */
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Craig Inches <Craig@craiginches.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/lnet/socklnd.h | 3 ++-
> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/lnet/socklnd.h b/drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/lnet/socklnd.h
> > > index dd5bc0e46560..a1ae66ede7a8 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/lnet/socklnd.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/lnet/socklnd.h
> > > @@ -76,7 +76,8 @@ struct ksock_msg {
> > > 	__u64	ksm_zc_cookies[2];	/* Zero-Copy request/ACK cookie */
> > > 	union {
> > > 		struct ksock_lnet_msg lnetmsg; /* lnet message, it's empty if
> > > -					  * it's NOOP */
> > > +						* it's NOOP
> > > +						*/
> > 
> > Rather than making the multi-line comments even more space consuming (I'm not a big
> > fan of "*/ must be on a line by itself" since it wastes a lot of vertical space),
> > I'd prefer to just shorten the comment, if possible, like:
> > 
> > 		struct ksock_lnet_msg lnetmsg; /* lnet message, empty if NOOP */
> 
> That makes sense, I believe the series has already made it to
> staging-next, so not sure what the process would be to fix it up.

staging-next can't be rebased (barring something very drastic).  Send a
new patch based on what's been committed.

regards,
dan carpenter

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web