Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1600043 > unrolled thread

[PATCH] ks7010: adding parenthesis to macro argument

Started byPushkar Jambhlekar <pushkar.iit@gmail.com>
First post2017-03-14 06:50 +0100
Last post2017-03-14 11:50 +0100
Articles 4 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH] ks7010: adding parenthesis to macro argument Pushkar Jambhlekar <pushkar.iit@gmail.com> - 2017-03-14 06:50 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] ks7010: adding parenthesis to macro argument Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2017-03-14 10:50 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] ks7010: adding parenthesis to macro argument Pushkar Jambhlekar <pushkar.iit@gmail.com> - 2017-03-14 11:10 +0100
        Re: [PATCH] ks7010: adding parenthesis to macro argument Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2017-03-14 11:50 +0100

#1600043 — [PATCH] ks7010: adding parenthesis to macro argument

FromPushkar Jambhlekar <pushkar.iit@gmail.com>
Date2017-03-14 06:50 +0100
Subject[PATCH] ks7010: adding parenthesis to macro argument
Message-ID<tkNvk-3Vo-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
Description:
In driver module ks7010, "checkpatch.pl" flags error for adding parenthesis around macro params.
Also, removing extra line.

Signed-off-by: Pushkar Jambhlekar <pushkar.iit@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/staging/ks7010/ks7010_sdio.c | 13 ++++++-------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks7010_sdio.c b/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks7010_sdio.c
index a604c83..644b8d4 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks7010_sdio.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks7010_sdio.c
@@ -35,18 +35,18 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(sdio, ks7010_sdio_ids);
 /* macro */
 
 #define inc_txqhead(priv) \
-	(priv->tx_dev.qhead = (priv->tx_dev.qhead + 1) % TX_DEVICE_BUFF_SIZE)
+	((priv)->tx_dev.qhead = ((priv)->tx_dev.qhead + 1) % TX_DEVICE_BUFF_SIZE)
 #define inc_txqtail(priv) \
-	(priv->tx_dev.qtail = (priv->tx_dev.qtail + 1) % TX_DEVICE_BUFF_SIZE)
+	((priv)->tx_dev.qtail = ((priv)->tx_dev.qtail + 1) % TX_DEVICE_BUFF_SIZE)
 #define cnt_txqbody(priv) \
-	(((priv->tx_dev.qtail + TX_DEVICE_BUFF_SIZE) - (priv->tx_dev.qhead)) % TX_DEVICE_BUFF_SIZE)
+	((((priv)->tx_dev.qtail + TX_DEVICE_BUFF_SIZE) - ((priv)->tx_dev.qhead)) % TX_DEVICE_BUFF_SIZE)
 
 #define inc_rxqhead(priv) \
-	(priv->rx_dev.qhead = (priv->rx_dev.qhead + 1) % RX_DEVICE_BUFF_SIZE)
+	((priv)->rx_dev.qhead = ((priv)->rx_dev.qhead + 1) % RX_DEVICE_BUFF_SIZE)
 #define inc_rxqtail(priv) \
-	(priv->rx_dev.qtail = (priv->rx_dev.qtail + 1) % RX_DEVICE_BUFF_SIZE)
+	((priv)->rx_dev.qtail = ((priv)->rx_dev.qtail + 1) % RX_DEVICE_BUFF_SIZE)
 #define cnt_rxqbody(priv) \
-	(((priv->rx_dev.qtail + RX_DEVICE_BUFF_SIZE) - (priv->rx_dev.qhead)) % RX_DEVICE_BUFF_SIZE)
+	((((priv)->rx_dev.qtail + RX_DEVICE_BUFF_SIZE) - ((priv)->rx_dev.qhead)) % RX_DEVICE_BUFF_SIZE)
 
 static int ks7010_sdio_read(struct ks_wlan_private *priv, unsigned int address,
 			    unsigned char *buffer, int length)
@@ -884,7 +884,6 @@ static void ks7010_card_init(struct ks_wlan_private *priv)
 	if (priv->mac_address_valid && priv->version_size)
 		priv->dev_state = DEVICE_STATE_PREINIT;
 
-
 	hostif_sme_enqueue(priv, SME_GET_EEPROM_CKSUM);
 
 	/* load initial wireless parameter */
-- 
2.7.4

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1600157

FromDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Date2017-03-14 10:50 +0100
Message-ID<tkRfA-6BP-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1600043
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 11:12:42AM +0530, Pushkar Jambhlekar wrote:
> Description:
> In driver module ks7010, "checkpatch.pl" flags error for adding parenthesis around macro params.
> Also, removing extra line.

Don't do this as one patch.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Pushkar Jambhlekar <pushkar.iit@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/ks7010/ks7010_sdio.c | 13 ++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks7010_sdio.c b/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks7010_sdio.c
> index a604c83..644b8d4 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks7010_sdio.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks7010_sdio.c
> @@ -35,18 +35,18 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(sdio, ks7010_sdio_ids);
>  /* macro */
>  
>  #define inc_txqhead(priv) \
> -	(priv->tx_dev.qhead = (priv->tx_dev.qhead + 1) % TX_DEVICE_BUFF_SIZE)
> +	((priv)->tx_dev.qhead = ((priv)->tx_dev.qhead + 1) % TX_DEVICE_BUFF_SIZE)

I can't get excited about this at all.  Make it a function or leave it
alone.

regards,
dan carpenter

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1600188

FromPushkar Jambhlekar <pushkar.iit@gmail.com>
Date2017-03-14 11:10 +0100
Message-ID<tkRyV-6XA-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1600157
Hi Dan,

I am trying to fix warnings by "checkpatch.pl". Even though it is not
super exciting, no harm to follow correct way.

On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 2:43 AM, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 11:12:42AM +0530, Pushkar Jambhlekar wrote:
>> Description:
>> In driver module ks7010, "checkpatch.pl" flags error for adding parenthesis around macro params.
>> Also, removing extra line.
>
> Don't do this as one patch.
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pushkar Jambhlekar <pushkar.iit@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/staging/ks7010/ks7010_sdio.c | 13 ++++++-------
>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks7010_sdio.c b/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks7010_sdio.c
>> index a604c83..644b8d4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks7010_sdio.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks7010_sdio.c
>> @@ -35,18 +35,18 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(sdio, ks7010_sdio_ids);
>>  /* macro */
>>
>>  #define inc_txqhead(priv) \
>> -     (priv->tx_dev.qhead = (priv->tx_dev.qhead + 1) % TX_DEVICE_BUFF_SIZE)
>> +     ((priv)->tx_dev.qhead = ((priv)->tx_dev.qhead + 1) % TX_DEVICE_BUFF_SIZE)
>
> I can't get excited about this at all.  Make it a function or leave it
> alone.
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>



-- 
Jambhlekar Pushkar Arun
M.Tech IIT Roorkee

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1600206

FromDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Date2017-03-14 11:50 +0100
Message-ID<tkSbD-7fP-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1600188
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 03:01:50AM -0700, Pushkar Jambhlekar wrote:
> Hi Dan,
> 
> I am trying to fix warnings by "checkpatch.pl". Even though it is not
> super exciting, no harm to follow correct way.
> 

The harm is that it takes something that's already terrible and makes it
even more unreadable.

regards,
dan carpenter

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web