Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1600043 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Pushkar Jambhlekar <pushkar.iit@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-03-14 06:50 +0100 |
| Last post | 2017-03-14 11:50 +0100 |
| Articles | 4 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH] ks7010: adding parenthesis to macro argument Pushkar Jambhlekar <pushkar.iit@gmail.com> - 2017-03-14 06:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] ks7010: adding parenthesis to macro argument Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2017-03-14 10:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] ks7010: adding parenthesis to macro argument Pushkar Jambhlekar <pushkar.iit@gmail.com> - 2017-03-14 11:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] ks7010: adding parenthesis to macro argument Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2017-03-14 11:50 +0100
| From | Pushkar Jambhlekar <pushkar.iit@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-14 06:50 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCH] ks7010: adding parenthesis to macro argument |
| Message-ID | <tkNvk-3Vo-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Description: In driver module ks7010, "checkpatch.pl" flags error for adding parenthesis around macro params. Also, removing extra line. Signed-off-by: Pushkar Jambhlekar <pushkar.iit@gmail.com> --- drivers/staging/ks7010/ks7010_sdio.c | 13 ++++++------- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks7010_sdio.c b/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks7010_sdio.c index a604c83..644b8d4 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks7010_sdio.c +++ b/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks7010_sdio.c @@ -35,18 +35,18 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(sdio, ks7010_sdio_ids); /* macro */ #define inc_txqhead(priv) \ - (priv->tx_dev.qhead = (priv->tx_dev.qhead + 1) % TX_DEVICE_BUFF_SIZE) + ((priv)->tx_dev.qhead = ((priv)->tx_dev.qhead + 1) % TX_DEVICE_BUFF_SIZE) #define inc_txqtail(priv) \ - (priv->tx_dev.qtail = (priv->tx_dev.qtail + 1) % TX_DEVICE_BUFF_SIZE) + ((priv)->tx_dev.qtail = ((priv)->tx_dev.qtail + 1) % TX_DEVICE_BUFF_SIZE) #define cnt_txqbody(priv) \ - (((priv->tx_dev.qtail + TX_DEVICE_BUFF_SIZE) - (priv->tx_dev.qhead)) % TX_DEVICE_BUFF_SIZE) + ((((priv)->tx_dev.qtail + TX_DEVICE_BUFF_SIZE) - ((priv)->tx_dev.qhead)) % TX_DEVICE_BUFF_SIZE) #define inc_rxqhead(priv) \ - (priv->rx_dev.qhead = (priv->rx_dev.qhead + 1) % RX_DEVICE_BUFF_SIZE) + ((priv)->rx_dev.qhead = ((priv)->rx_dev.qhead + 1) % RX_DEVICE_BUFF_SIZE) #define inc_rxqtail(priv) \ - (priv->rx_dev.qtail = (priv->rx_dev.qtail + 1) % RX_DEVICE_BUFF_SIZE) + ((priv)->rx_dev.qtail = ((priv)->rx_dev.qtail + 1) % RX_DEVICE_BUFF_SIZE) #define cnt_rxqbody(priv) \ - (((priv->rx_dev.qtail + RX_DEVICE_BUFF_SIZE) - (priv->rx_dev.qhead)) % RX_DEVICE_BUFF_SIZE) + ((((priv)->rx_dev.qtail + RX_DEVICE_BUFF_SIZE) - ((priv)->rx_dev.qhead)) % RX_DEVICE_BUFF_SIZE) static int ks7010_sdio_read(struct ks_wlan_private *priv, unsigned int address, unsigned char *buffer, int length) @@ -884,7 +884,6 @@ static void ks7010_card_init(struct ks_wlan_private *priv) if (priv->mac_address_valid && priv->version_size) priv->dev_state = DEVICE_STATE_PREINIT; - hostif_sme_enqueue(priv, SME_GET_EEPROM_CKSUM); /* load initial wireless parameter */ -- 2.7.4
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-14 10:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tkRfA-6BP-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1600043 |
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 11:12:42AM +0530, Pushkar Jambhlekar wrote: > Description: > In driver module ks7010, "checkpatch.pl" flags error for adding parenthesis around macro params. > Also, removing extra line. Don't do this as one patch. > > Signed-off-by: Pushkar Jambhlekar <pushkar.iit@gmail.com> > --- > drivers/staging/ks7010/ks7010_sdio.c | 13 ++++++------- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks7010_sdio.c b/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks7010_sdio.c > index a604c83..644b8d4 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks7010_sdio.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks7010_sdio.c > @@ -35,18 +35,18 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(sdio, ks7010_sdio_ids); > /* macro */ > > #define inc_txqhead(priv) \ > - (priv->tx_dev.qhead = (priv->tx_dev.qhead + 1) % TX_DEVICE_BUFF_SIZE) > + ((priv)->tx_dev.qhead = ((priv)->tx_dev.qhead + 1) % TX_DEVICE_BUFF_SIZE) I can't get excited about this at all. Make it a function or leave it alone. regards, dan carpenter
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Pushkar Jambhlekar <pushkar.iit@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-14 11:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tkRyV-6XA-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1600157 |
Hi Dan, I am trying to fix warnings by "checkpatch.pl". Even though it is not super exciting, no harm to follow correct way. On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 2:43 AM, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 11:12:42AM +0530, Pushkar Jambhlekar wrote: >> Description: >> In driver module ks7010, "checkpatch.pl" flags error for adding parenthesis around macro params. >> Also, removing extra line. > > Don't do this as one patch. > >> >> Signed-off-by: Pushkar Jambhlekar <pushkar.iit@gmail.com> >> --- >> drivers/staging/ks7010/ks7010_sdio.c | 13 ++++++------- >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks7010_sdio.c b/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks7010_sdio.c >> index a604c83..644b8d4 100644 >> --- a/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks7010_sdio.c >> +++ b/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks7010_sdio.c >> @@ -35,18 +35,18 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(sdio, ks7010_sdio_ids); >> /* macro */ >> >> #define inc_txqhead(priv) \ >> - (priv->tx_dev.qhead = (priv->tx_dev.qhead + 1) % TX_DEVICE_BUFF_SIZE) >> + ((priv)->tx_dev.qhead = ((priv)->tx_dev.qhead + 1) % TX_DEVICE_BUFF_SIZE) > > I can't get excited about this at all. Make it a function or leave it > alone. > > regards, > dan carpenter > -- Jambhlekar Pushkar Arun M.Tech IIT Roorkee
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-14 11:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tkSbD-7fP-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1600188 |
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 03:01:50AM -0700, Pushkar Jambhlekar wrote: > Hi Dan, > > I am trying to fix warnings by "checkpatch.pl". Even though it is not > super exciting, no harm to follow correct way. > The harm is that it takes something that's already terrible and makes it even more unreadable. regards, dan carpenter
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web