Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1671581 > unrolled thread

[RFC PATCH v3 0/6] Report wakeup events in cros_ec_keyb and make cros-ec-spi wakeup optional

Started byJeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>
First post2017-06-21 12:10 +0200
Last post2017-06-21 13:00 +0200
Articles 14 — 6 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [RFC PATCH v3 0/6] Report wakeup events in cros_ec_keyb and make cros-ec-spi wakeup optional Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com> - 2017-06-21 12:10 +0200
    [RFC PATCH v3 6/6] ARM: dts: cros-ec-keyboard: enable as wakeup source Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com> - 2017-06-21 12:10 +0200
    [RFC PATCH v3 2/6] dt-bindings: spi/core: add wakeup-source optional property Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com> - 2017-06-21 12:10 +0200
      Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/6] dt-bindings: spi/core: add wakeup-source  optional property Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> - 2017-06-26 18:10 +0200
        Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/6] dt-bindings: spi/core: add wakeup-source  optional property Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> - 2017-06-26 18:50 +0200
          Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/6] dt-bindings: spi/core: add wakeup-source optional  property jeffy <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com> - 2017-06-27 04:10 +0200
            Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/6] dt-bindings: spi/core: add wakeup-source  optional property Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> - 2017-06-30 16:50 +0200
    [RFC PATCH v3 5/6] input: cros_ec_keyb: report wakeup events Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com> - 2017-06-21 12:10 +0200
    [RFC PATCH v3 3/6] ARM/arm64: dts: enable wakeup for cros-ec-spi devices Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com> - 2017-06-21 12:10 +0200
      Re: [RFC PATCH v3 3/6] ARM/arm64: dts: enable wakeup for cros-ec-spi devices Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> - 2017-06-21 12:50 +0200
        Re: [RFC PATCH v3 3/6] ARM/arm64: dts: enable wakeup for cros-ec-spi  devices Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> - 2017-06-21 18:50 +0200
          Re: [RFC PATCH v3 3/6] ARM/arm64: dts: enable wakeup for cros-ec-spi  devices jeffy <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com> - 2017-06-22 04:40 +0200
    [RFC PATCH v3 1/6] spi: core: add support for wakeup-source dts property Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com> - 2017-06-21 12:10 +0200
      Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/6] spi: core: add support for wakeup-source dts  property Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2017-06-21 13:00 +0200

#1671581 — [RFC PATCH v3 0/6] Report wakeup events in cros_ec_keyb and make cros-ec-spi wakeup optional

FromJeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>
Date2017-06-21 12:10 +0200
Subject[RFC PATCH v3 0/6] Report wakeup events in cros_ec_keyb and make cros-ec-spi wakeup optional
Message-ID<tUKKd-4KQ-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
We are enabling wakeup unconditionally for cros-ec-spi, it would be good to make it optional.

And we also need to enable wakeup for cros_ec_keyb, so the userspace could disable keyboard wakeup along with other cros-ec sub devices.


Changes in v3:
Use wakeup-source property to enable wakeup.
  Suggested by Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>.

Jeffy Chen (6):
  spi: core: add support for wakeup-source dts property
  dt-bindings: spi/core: add wakeup-source optional property
  ARM/arm64: dts: enable wakeup for cros-ec-spi devices
  mfd: cros ec: spi: remove unconditionally wakeup enable
  input: cros_ec_keyb: report wakeup events
  ARM: dts: cros-ec-keyboard: enable as wakeup source

 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-bus.txt |  1 +
 arch/arm/boot/dts/cros-ec-keyboard.dtsi           |  1 +
 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-peach-pit.dts        |  1 +
 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800-peach-pi.dts         |  1 +
 arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-veyron-chromebook.dtsi   |  1 +
 arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra124-nyan.dtsi              |  1 +
 arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra124-venice2.dts            |  1 +
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra132-norrin.dts    |  1 +
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-gru.dtsi      |  1 +
 drivers/input/keyboard/cros_ec_keyb.c             |  8 ++++++++
 drivers/mfd/cros_ec_spi.c                         |  2 --
 drivers/spi/spi.c                                 | 15 +++++++++++----
 12 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

-- 
2.1.4

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1671582 — [RFC PATCH v3 6/6] ARM: dts: cros-ec-keyboard: enable as wakeup source

FromJeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>
Date2017-06-21 12:10 +0200
Subject[RFC PATCH v3 6/6] ARM: dts: cros-ec-keyboard: enable as wakeup source
Message-ID<tUKKd-4KQ-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1671581
Enable cros-ec-keyboard as a wakeup source.

Signed-off-by: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>
---

Changes in v3: None

 arch/arm/boot/dts/cros-ec-keyboard.dtsi | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/cros-ec-keyboard.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/cros-ec-keyboard.dtsi
index c0451051..3168a5e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/cros-ec-keyboard.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/cros-ec-keyboard.dtsi
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
 		keypad,num-rows = <8>;
 		keypad,num-columns = <13>;
 		google,needs-ghost-filter;
+		wakeup-source;
 
 		linux,keymap = <
 			MATRIX_KEY(0x00, 0x01, KEY_LEFTMETA)
-- 
2.1.4

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1671583 — [RFC PATCH v3 2/6] dt-bindings: spi/core: add wakeup-source optional property

FromJeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>
Date2017-06-21 12:10 +0200
Subject[RFC PATCH v3 2/6] dt-bindings: spi/core: add wakeup-source optional property
Message-ID<tUKKd-4KQ-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1671581
Update document devicetree bindings to support "wakeup-source" property.

Signed-off-by: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>
---

Changes in v3: None

 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-bus.txt | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-bus.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-bus.txt
index 1f6e86f..0fa1ccf 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-bus.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-bus.txt
@@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ All slave nodes can contain the following optional properties:
 		    Defaults to 1 if not present.
 - spi-rx-delay-us - Microsecond delay after a read transfer.
 - spi-tx-delay-us - Microsecond delay after a write transfer.
+- wakeup-source   - Device can be used as a wakeup source.
 
 Some SPI controllers and devices support Dual and Quad SPI transfer mode.
 It allows data in the SPI system to be transferred using 2 wires (DUAL) or 4
-- 
2.1.4

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1674911 — Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/6] dt-bindings: spi/core: add wakeup-source optional property

FromRob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Date2017-06-26 18:10 +0200
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH v3 2/6] dt-bindings: spi/core: add wakeup-source optional property
Message-ID<tWEKm-4wE-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1671583
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 06:01:49PM +0800, Jeffy Chen wrote:
> Update document devicetree bindings to support "wakeup-source" property.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>
> ---
> 
> Changes in v3: None
> 
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-bus.txt | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-bus.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-bus.txt
> index 1f6e86f..0fa1ccf 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-bus.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-bus.txt
> @@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ All slave nodes can contain the following optional properties:
>  		    Defaults to 1 if not present.
>  - spi-rx-delay-us - Microsecond delay after a read transfer.
>  - spi-tx-delay-us - Microsecond delay after a write transfer.
> +- wakeup-source   - Device can be used as a wakeup source.

wakeup-source is valid for any device with an interrupts property 
already, so I don't think this is necessary.

Rob

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1674936 — Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/6] dt-bindings: spi/core: add wakeup-source optional property

FromDmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Date2017-06-26 18:50 +0200
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH v3 2/6] dt-bindings: spi/core: add wakeup-source optional property
Message-ID<tWFn3-4Lf-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1674911
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 11:00:11AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 06:01:49PM +0800, Jeffy Chen wrote:
> > Update document devicetree bindings to support "wakeup-source" property.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>
> > ---
> > 
> > Changes in v3: None
> > 
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-bus.txt | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-bus.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-bus.txt
> > index 1f6e86f..0fa1ccf 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-bus.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-bus.txt
> > @@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ All slave nodes can contain the following optional properties:
> >  		    Defaults to 1 if not present.
> >  - spi-rx-delay-us - Microsecond delay after a read transfer.
> >  - spi-tx-delay-us - Microsecond delay after a write transfer.
> > +- wakeup-source   - Device can be used as a wakeup source.
> 
> wakeup-source is valid for any device with an interrupts property 
> already, so I don't think this is necessary.

Do you mean it is not necessary on SPI level or not necessary at all? Or
you disagree with wording? Because we do need a way to say that on given
platform the device is supposed to be configured as a wakeup source.

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1675239 — Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/6] dt-bindings: spi/core: add wakeup-source optional property

Fromjeffy <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>
Date2017-06-27 04:10 +0200
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH v3 2/6] dt-bindings: spi/core: add wakeup-source optional property
Message-ID<tWO6Z-2cR-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1674936
Hi Rob,

On 06/27/2017 12:40 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 11:00:11AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 06:01:49PM +0800, Jeffy Chen wrote:
>>> Update document devicetree bindings to support "wakeup-source" property.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Changes in v3: None
>>>
>>>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-bus.txt | 1 +
>>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-bus.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-bus.txt
>>> index 1f6e86f..0fa1ccf 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-bus.txt
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-bus.txt
>>> @@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ All slave nodes can contain the following optional properties:
>>>   		    Defaults to 1 if not present.
>>>   - spi-rx-delay-us - Microsecond delay after a read transfer.
>>>   - spi-tx-delay-us - Microsecond delay after a write transfer.
>>> +- wakeup-source   - Device can be used as a wakeup source.
>>
>> wakeup-source is valid for any device with an interrupts property
>> already, so I don't think this is necessary.
i saw http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1510.2/04553.html add a 
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/wakeup-source.txt for this, but 
that serial didn't remove all wakeup-source property from other 
bindings, but standardize them, for example:
71a0151 Documentation: devicetree: fix reference to legacy wakeup properties

+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys.txt
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ Optional subnode-properties:
         - debounce-interval: Debouncing interval time in milliseconds.
           If not specified defaults to 5.
         - wakeup-source: Boolean, button can wake-up the system.
+                        (Legacy property supported: "gpio-key,wakeup")

>
> Do you mean it is not necessary on SPI level or not necessary at all? Or
> you disagree with wording? Because we do need a way to say that on given
> platform the device is supposed to be configured as a wakeup source.
>
> Thanks.
>

Hi guys,

Mark Brown suggested to put wakeup-source support in some common place 
instead of sub drivers, should we do that?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1678891 — Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/6] dt-bindings: spi/core: add wakeup-source optional property

FromRob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Date2017-06-30 16:50 +0200
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH v3 2/6] dt-bindings: spi/core: add wakeup-source optional property
Message-ID<tY5p8-6GC-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1675239
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 9:04 PM, jeffy <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com> wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> On 06/27/2017 12:40 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 11:00:11AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 06:01:49PM +0800, Jeffy Chen wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Update document devicetree bindings to support "wakeup-source" property.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> Changes in v3: None
>>>>
>>>>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-bus.txt | 1 +
>>>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-bus.txt
>>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-bus.txt
>>>> index 1f6e86f..0fa1ccf 100644
>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-bus.txt
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-bus.txt
>>>> @@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ All slave nodes can contain the following optional
>>>> properties:
>>>>                     Defaults to 1 if not present.
>>>>   - spi-rx-delay-us - Microsecond delay after a read transfer.
>>>>   - spi-tx-delay-us - Microsecond delay after a write transfer.
>>>> +- wakeup-source   - Device can be used as a wakeup source.
>>>
>>>
>>> wakeup-source is valid for any device with an interrupts property
>>> already, so I don't think this is necessary.
>
> i saw http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1510.2/04553.html add a
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/wakeup-source.txt for this, but that
> serial didn't remove all wakeup-source property from other bindings, but
> standardize them, for example:
> 71a0151 Documentation: devicetree: fix reference to legacy wakeup properties
>
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys.txt
> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ Optional subnode-properties:
>         - debounce-interval: Debouncing interval time in milliseconds.
>           If not specified defaults to 5.
>         - wakeup-source: Boolean, button can wake-up the system.
> +                        (Legacy property supported: "gpio-key,wakeup")
>
>>
>> Do you mean it is not necessary on SPI level or not necessary at all? Or
>> you disagree with wording? Because we do need a way to say that on given
>> platform the device is supposed to be configured as a wakeup source.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>
> Hi guys,
>
> Mark Brown suggested to put wakeup-source support in some common place
> instead of sub drivers, should we do that?

As you point out, it is already documented in a common place. In SPI
makes no sense. Are you going to document in I2C, simple-bus, USB,
etc. as well?

wakeup-source is really a property of the system (the upstream
interrupt controller in particular), so it doesn't really need to be
documented per device.

Rob

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1671584 — [RFC PATCH v3 5/6] input: cros_ec_keyb: report wakeup events

FromJeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>
Date2017-06-21 12:10 +0200
Subject[RFC PATCH v3 5/6] input: cros_ec_keyb: report wakeup events
Message-ID<tUKKd-4KQ-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1671581
Report wakeup events when process events.

Signed-off-by: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>

---

Changes in v3:
Use wakeup-source property to enable wakeup.
  Suggested by Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>.

 drivers/input/keyboard/cros_ec_keyb.c | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/input/keyboard/cros_ec_keyb.c b/drivers/input/keyboard/cros_ec_keyb.c
index 79eb295..5dc387b 100644
--- a/drivers/input/keyboard/cros_ec_keyb.c
+++ b/drivers/input/keyboard/cros_ec_keyb.c
@@ -293,6 +293,9 @@ static int cros_ec_keyb_work(struct notifier_block *nb,
 		return NOTIFY_DONE;
 	}
 
+	if (device_may_wakeup(ckdev->dev))
+		pm_wakeup_event(ckdev->dev, 0);
+
 	return NOTIFY_OK;
 }
 
@@ -639,6 +642,9 @@ static int cros_ec_keyb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		return err;
 	}
 
+	if (device_property_read_bool(dev, "wakeup-source"))
+		device_init_wakeup(dev, true);
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -649,6 +655,8 @@ static int cros_ec_keyb_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	blocking_notifier_chain_unregister(&ckdev->ec->event_notifier,
 					   &ckdev->notifier);
 
+	device_init_wakeup(&pdev->dev, false);
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.1.4

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1671586 — [RFC PATCH v3 3/6] ARM/arm64: dts: enable wakeup for cros-ec-spi devices

FromJeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>
Date2017-06-21 12:10 +0200
Subject[RFC PATCH v3 3/6] ARM/arm64: dts: enable wakeup for cros-ec-spi devices
Message-ID<tUKKe-4KQ-29@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1671581
We used to enable wakeup for cros-ec-spi devices unconditionally.
Now we are using the more generic wakeup-source property to enable it.

Signed-off-by: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>
---

Changes in v3: None

 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-peach-pit.dts      | 1 +
 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800-peach-pi.dts       | 1 +
 arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-veyron-chromebook.dtsi | 1 +
 arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra124-nyan.dtsi            | 1 +
 arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra124-venice2.dts          | 1 +
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra132-norrin.dts  | 1 +
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-gru.dtsi    | 1 +
 7 files changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-peach-pit.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-peach-pit.dts
index f9a75bf..a65ec2a 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-peach-pit.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-peach-pit.dts
@@ -950,6 +950,7 @@
 		reg = <0>;
 		spi-max-frequency = <3125000>;
 		google,has-vbc-nvram;
+		wakeup-source;
 
 		controller-data {
 			samsung,spi-feedback-delay = <1>;
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800-peach-pi.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800-peach-pi.dts
index 953dc86..5209832 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800-peach-pi.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800-peach-pi.dts
@@ -919,6 +919,7 @@
 		reg = <0>;
 		spi-max-frequency = <3125000>;
 		google,has-vbc-nvram;
+		wakeup-source;
 
 		controller-data {
 			samsung,spi-feedback-delay = <1>;
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-veyron-chromebook.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-veyron-chromebook.dtsi
index d752a31..94924df 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-veyron-chromebook.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-veyron-chromebook.dtsi
@@ -232,6 +232,7 @@
 		pinctrl-names = "default";
 		pinctrl-0 = <&ec_int>;
 		spi-max-frequency = <3000000>;
+		wakeup-source;
 
 		i2c_tunnel: i2c-tunnel {
 			compatible = "google,cros-ec-i2c-tunnel";
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra124-nyan.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra124-nyan.dtsi
index 5cf987b..198fc30 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra124-nyan.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra124-nyan.dtsi
@@ -318,6 +318,7 @@
 			reg = <0>;
 
 			google,cros-ec-spi-msg-delay = <2000>;
+			wakeup-source;
 
 			i2c-tunnel {
 				compatible = "google,cros-ec-i2c-tunnel";
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra124-venice2.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra124-venice2.dts
index 6e59cec..008574d 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra124-venice2.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra124-venice2.dts
@@ -845,6 +845,7 @@
 			reg = <0>;
 
 			google,cros-ec-spi-msg-delay = <2000>;
+			wakeup-source;
 
 			i2c-tunnel {
 				compatible = "google,cros-ec-i2c-tunnel";
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra132-norrin.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra132-norrin.dts
index 759af96..e0e54a9 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra132-norrin.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra132-norrin.dts
@@ -758,6 +758,7 @@
 			reg = <0>;
 
 			google,cros-ec-spi-msg-delay = <2000>;
+			wakeup-source;
 
 			i2c_20: i2c-tunnel {
 				compatible = "google,cros-ec-i2c-tunnel";
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-gru.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-gru.dtsi
index eb50593..409199b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-gru.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-gru.dtsi
@@ -798,6 +798,7 @@ ap_i2c_audio: &i2c8 {
 		pinctrl-names = "default";
 		pinctrl-0 = <&ec_ap_int_l>;
 		spi-max-frequency = <3000000>;
+		wakeup-source;
 
 		i2c_tunnel: i2c-tunnel {
 			compatible = "google,cros-ec-i2c-tunnel";
-- 
2.1.4

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1671603 — Re: [RFC PATCH v3 3/6] ARM/arm64: dts: enable wakeup for cros-ec-spi devices

FromKrzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Date2017-06-21 12:50 +0200
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH v3 3/6] ARM/arm64: dts: enable wakeup for cros-ec-spi devices
Message-ID<tULmV-4Zi-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1671586
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 12:01 PM, Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com> wrote:
> We used to enable wakeup for cros-ec-spi devices unconditionally.
> Now we are using the more generic wakeup-source property to enable it.

Using wakeup-source property is still enabling this unconditionally.
What  do you exactly mean here?

>
> Signed-off-by: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>
> ---
>
> Changes in v3: None
>
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-peach-pit.dts      | 1 +
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800-peach-pi.dts       | 1 +
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-veyron-chromebook.dtsi | 1 +
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra124-nyan.dtsi            | 1 +
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra124-venice2.dts          | 1 +
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra132-norrin.dts  | 1 +
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-gru.dtsi    | 1 +
>  7 files changed, 7 insertions(+)

Please split it per arch (arm and arm64) and per machine. I'll take
exynos after splitting.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1671799 — Re: [RFC PATCH v3 3/6] ARM/arm64: dts: enable wakeup for cros-ec-spi devices

FromKrzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Date2017-06-21 18:50 +0200
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH v3 3/6] ARM/arm64: dts: enable wakeup for cros-ec-spi devices
Message-ID<tUQZk-aB-29@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1671603
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 11:33:29PM +0800, jeffy wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> thanx for your comment.
> 
> On 06/21/2017 06:45 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 12:01 PM, Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com> wrote:
> > > We used to enable wakeup for cros-ec-spi devices unconditionally.
> > > Now we are using the more generic wakeup-source property to enable it.
> > 
> > Using wakeup-source property is still enabling this unconditionally.
> > What  do you exactly mean here?
> i mean the wakeup-source is an optional property, we can disable wakeup by
> not adding it.

Maybe mention this in commit msg? This removes any confusion. "Till now
the driver always enabled wakeup but now it supports wakeup property so
add it to keep same functionality."

Best regards,
Krzysztof

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1672264 — Re: [RFC PATCH v3 3/6] ARM/arm64: dts: enable wakeup for cros-ec-spi devices

Fromjeffy <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>
Date2017-06-22 04:40 +0200
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH v3 3/6] ARM/arm64: dts: enable wakeup for cros-ec-spi devices
Message-ID<tV0ch-6LK-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1671799
Hi Krzysztof,

thanx for noting that, will add it to next version :)


On 06/21/2017 11:36 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 11:33:29PM +0800, jeffy wrote:
>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>
>> thanx for your comment.
>>
>> On 06/21/2017 06:45 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 12:01 PM, Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com> wrote:
>>>> We used to enable wakeup for cros-ec-spi devices unconditionally.
>>>> Now we are using the more generic wakeup-source property to enable it.
>>>
>>> Using wakeup-source property is still enabling this unconditionally.
>>> What  do you exactly mean here?
>> i mean the wakeup-source is an optional property, we can disable wakeup by
>> not adding it.
>
> Maybe mention this in commit msg? This removes any confusion. "Till now
> the driver always enabled wakeup but now it supports wakeup property so
> add it to keep same functionality."
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
>
>
>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1671587 — [RFC PATCH v3 1/6] spi: core: add support for wakeup-source dts property

FromJeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>
Date2017-06-21 12:10 +0200
Subject[RFC PATCH v3 1/6] spi: core: add support for wakeup-source dts property
Message-ID<tUKKe-4KQ-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1671581
Use generic wakeup-source property to enable spi device wakeup.

Signed-off-by: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>
---

Changes in v3: None

 drivers/spi/spi.c | 15 +++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi.c b/drivers/spi/spi.c
index c3f6b52..a510bba 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi.c
@@ -547,11 +547,16 @@ int spi_add_device(struct spi_device *spi)
 
 	/* Device may be bound to an active driver when this returns */
 	status = device_add(&spi->dev);
-	if (status < 0)
+	if (status < 0) {
 		dev_err(dev, "can't add %s, status %d\n",
-				dev_name(&spi->dev), status);
-	else
-		dev_dbg(dev, "registered child %s\n", dev_name(&spi->dev));
+			dev_name(&spi->dev), status);
+		goto done;
+	}
+
+	dev_dbg(dev, "registered child %s\n", dev_name(&spi->dev));
+
+	if (device_property_read_bool(&spi->dev, "wakeup-source"))
+		device_init_wakeup(&spi->dev, true);
 
 done:
 	mutex_unlock(&spi_add_lock);
@@ -638,6 +643,8 @@ void spi_unregister_device(struct spi_device *spi)
 	if (!spi)
 		return;
 
+	device_init_wakeup(&spi->dev, false);
+
 	if (spi->dev.of_node) {
 		of_node_clear_flag(spi->dev.of_node, OF_POPULATED);
 		of_node_put(spi->dev.of_node);
-- 
2.1.4

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1671608 — Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/6] spi: core: add support for wakeup-source dts property

FromMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Date2017-06-21 13:00 +0200
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH v3 1/6] spi: core: add support for wakeup-source dts property
Message-ID<tULwC-52u-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1671587

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 06:01:48PM +0800, Jeffy Chen wrote:
> Use generic wakeup-source property to enable spi device wakeup.

If this is a generic property shouldn't it be in the driver core rather
than individual subsystems?

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web