Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1633256 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 2/2 v2] char: misc: use octal permissions for the proc entry

Started byMartin Kaiser <martin@kaiser.cx>
First post2017-04-29 09:10 +0200
Last post2017-04-30 15:00 +0200
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH 2/2 v2] char: misc: use octal permissions for the proc  entry Martin Kaiser <martin@kaiser.cx> - 2017-04-29 09:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 2/2 v2] char: misc: use octal permissions for the proc entry Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> - 2017-04-30 15:00 +0200

#1633256 — Re: [PATCH 2/2 v2] char: misc: use octal permissions for the proc entry

FromMartin Kaiser <martin@kaiser.cx>
Date2017-04-29 09:10 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2 v2] char: misc: use octal permissions for the proc entry
Message-ID<tBuFX-39X-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Hello Andy,

Thus wrote Andy Shevchenko (andy.shevchenko@gmail.com):

> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 12:11 PM, Martin Kaiser <martin@kaiser.cx> wrote:

> > checkpatch is asking for a 4 digit octal number. And at least for me,
> > 0444 makes it clearer what the permissions actually are. Yes, somewhere
> > in the code, I can dig up that 0 is changed to 0444...

> Aren't 0 and 0444 different by meaning?

my undestanding is that proc_create() calls proc_create_data(), where

   if ((mode & S_IALLUGO) == 0)
      mode |= S_IRUGO;

sets mode to 0444 when it was 0.

Best regards,
Martin

(added the lkml back to Cc, I removed it by accident in an earlier mail)

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1633435 — Re: [PATCH 2/2 v2] char: misc: use octal permissions for the proc entry

FromAndy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Date2017-04-30 15:00 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2 v2] char: misc: use octal permissions for the proc entry
Message-ID<tBWCd-3lS-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1633256
On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 10:05 AM, Martin Kaiser <martin@kaiser.cx> wrote:
> Thus wrote Andy Shevchenko (andy.shevchenko@gmail.com):
>> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 12:11 PM, Martin Kaiser <martin@kaiser.cx> wrote:

>> Aren't 0 and 0444 different by meaning?
>
> my undestanding is that proc_create() calls proc_create_data(), where
>
>    if ((mode & S_IALLUGO) == 0)
>       mode |= S_IRUGO;
>
> sets mode to 0444 when it was 0.

Ah, okay. Fair enough.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web