Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1565451 > unrolled thread

linux-next: manual merge of the mfd tree with the arm-soc tree

Started byStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
First post2017-01-24 03:50 +0100
Last post2017-01-24 09:20 +0100
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  linux-next: manual merge of the mfd tree with the arm-soc tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2017-01-24 03:50 +0100
    Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mfd tree with the arm-soc tree Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2017-01-24 09:20 +0100

#1565451 — linux-next: manual merge of the mfd tree with the arm-soc tree

FromStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date2017-01-24 03:50 +0100
Subjectlinux-next: manual merge of the mfd tree with the arm-soc tree
Message-ID<t2Zlf-6Jz-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the mfd tree got a conflict in:

  arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429.dtsi

between commits:

  3604ef9c8154 ("ARM: dts: stm32: Add ADC support to stm32f429")
  dd3feb755a4a ("ARM: dts: stm32: Add RTC support for STM32F429 MCU")

from the arm-soc tree and commit:

  9072b6b2ba83 ("ARM: dts: stm32: add Timers driver for stm32f429 MCU")

from the mfd tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429.dtsi
index f05a9d95ef23,b6089351c0d3..000000000000
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429.dtsi
@@@ -125,20 -218,73 +225,87 @@@
  			status = "disabled";
  		};
  
+ 		timers7: timers@40001400 {
+ 			#address-cells = <1>;
+ 			#size-cells = <0>;
+ 			compatible = "st,stm32-timers";
+ 			reg = <0x40001400 0x400>;
+ 			clocks = <&rcc 0 133>;
+ 			clock-names = "int";
+ 			status = "disabled";
+ 
+ 			timer@6 {
+ 				compatible = "st,stm32-timer-trigger";
+ 				reg = <6>;
+ 				status = "disabled";
+ 			};
+ 		};
+ 
+ 			timers12: timers@40001800 {
+ 			#address-cells = <1>;
+ 			#size-cells = <0>;
+ 			compatible = "st,stm32-timers";
+ 			reg = <0x40001800 0x400>;
+ 			clocks = <&rcc 0 134>;
+ 			clock-names = "int";
+ 			status = "disabled";
+ 
+ 			pwm {
+ 				compatible = "st,stm32-pwm";
+ 				status = "disabled";
+ 			};
+ 
+ 			timer@11 {
+ 				compatible = "st,stm32-timer-trigger";
+ 				reg = <11>;
+ 				status = "disabled";
+ 			};
+ 		};
+ 
+ 		timers13: timers@40001c00 {
+ 			#address-cells = <1>;
+ 			#size-cells = <0>;
+ 			compatible = "st,stm32-timers";
+ 			reg = <0x40001C00 0x400>;
+ 			clocks = <&rcc 0 135>;
+ 			clock-names = "int";
+ 			status = "disabled";
+ 
+ 			pwm {
+ 				compatible = "st,stm32-pwm";
+ 				status = "disabled";
+ 			};
+ 		};
+ 
+ 		timers14: timers@40002000 {
+ 			#address-cells = <1>;
+ 			#size-cells = <0>;
+ 			compatible = "st,stm32-timers";
+ 			reg = <0x40002000 0x400>;
+ 			clocks = <&rcc 0 136>;
+ 			clock-names = "int";
+ 			status = "disabled";
+ 
+ 			pwm {
+ 				compatible = "st,stm32-pwm";
+ 				status = "disabled";
+ 			};
+ 		};
+ 
 +		rtc: rtc@40002800 {
 +			compatible = "st,stm32-rtc";
 +			reg = <0x40002800 0x400>;
 +			clocks = <&rcc 1 CLK_RTC>;
 +			clock-names = "ck_rtc";
 +			assigned-clocks = <&rcc 1 CLK_RTC>;
 +			assigned-clock-parents = <&rcc 1 CLK_LSE>;
 +			interrupt-parent = <&exti>;
 +			interrupts = <17 1>;
 +			interrupt-names = "alarm";
 +			st,syscfg = <&pwrcfg>;
 +			status = "disabled";
 +		};
 +
  		usart2: serial@40004400 {
  			compatible = "st,stm32-usart", "st,stm32-uart";
  			reg = <0x40004400 0x400>;
@@@ -433,11 -616,20 +693,26 @@@
  				};
  			};
  
 +			adc3_in8_pin: adc@200 {
 +				pins {
 +					pinmux = <STM32F429_PF10_FUNC_ANALOG>;
 +				};
 +			};
++
+ 			pwm1_pins: pwm@1 {
+ 				pins {
+ 					pinmux = <STM32F429_PA8_FUNC_TIM1_CH1>,
+ 						 <STM32F429_PB13_FUNC_TIM1_CH1N>,
+ 						 <STM32F429_PB12_FUNC_TIM1_BKIN>;
+ 				};
+ 			};
+ 
+ 			pwm3_pins: pwm@3 {
+ 				pins {
+ 					pinmux = <STM32F429_PB4_FUNC_TIM3_CH1>,
+ 						 <STM32F429_PB5_FUNC_TIM3_CH2>;
+ 				};
+ 			};
  		};
  
  		rcc: rcc@40023810 {

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1565619

FromLee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Date2017-01-24 09:20 +0100
Message-ID<t34uD-1Q8-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1565451
On Tue, 24 Jan 2017, Stephen Rothwell wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the mfd tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429.dtsi
> 
> between commits:
> 
>   3604ef9c8154 ("ARM: dts: stm32: Add ADC support to stm32f429")
>   dd3feb755a4a ("ARM: dts: stm32: Add RTC support for STM32F429 MCU")
> 
> from the arm-soc tree and commit:
> 
>   9072b6b2ba83 ("ARM: dts: stm32: add Timers driver for stm32f429 MCU")
> 
> from the mfd tree.

An immutable branch as already been posted for this.

> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web