Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1565619

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mfd tree with the arm-soc tree

From Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mfd tree with the arm-soc tree
Date 2017-01-24 09:20 +0100
Message-ID <t34uD-1Q8-25@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <t2Zlf-6Jz-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Tue, 24 Jan 2017, Stephen Rothwell wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the mfd tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429.dtsi
> 
> between commits:
> 
>   3604ef9c8154 ("ARM: dts: stm32: Add ADC support to stm32f429")
>   dd3feb755a4a ("ARM: dts: stm32: Add RTC support for STM32F429 MCU")
> 
> from the arm-soc tree and commit:
> 
>   9072b6b2ba83 ("ARM: dts: stm32: add Timers driver for stm32f429 MCU")
> 
> from the mfd tree.

An immutable branch as already been posted for this.

> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

linux-next: manual merge of the mfd tree with the arm-soc tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2017-01-24 03:50 +0100
  Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mfd tree with the arm-soc tree Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2017-01-24 09:20 +0100

csiph-web