Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1565451

linux-next: manual merge of the mfd tree with the arm-soc tree

From Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject linux-next: manual merge of the mfd tree with the arm-soc tree
Date 2017-01-24 03:50 +0100
Message-ID <t2Zlf-6Jz-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the mfd tree got a conflict in:

  arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429.dtsi

between commits:

  3604ef9c8154 ("ARM: dts: stm32: Add ADC support to stm32f429")
  dd3feb755a4a ("ARM: dts: stm32: Add RTC support for STM32F429 MCU")

from the arm-soc tree and commit:

  9072b6b2ba83 ("ARM: dts: stm32: add Timers driver for stm32f429 MCU")

from the mfd tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429.dtsi
index f05a9d95ef23,b6089351c0d3..000000000000
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429.dtsi
@@@ -125,20 -218,73 +225,87 @@@
  			status = "disabled";
  		};
  
+ 		timers7: timers@40001400 {
+ 			#address-cells = <1>;
+ 			#size-cells = <0>;
+ 			compatible = "st,stm32-timers";
+ 			reg = <0x40001400 0x400>;
+ 			clocks = <&rcc 0 133>;
+ 			clock-names = "int";
+ 			status = "disabled";
+ 
+ 			timer@6 {
+ 				compatible = "st,stm32-timer-trigger";
+ 				reg = <6>;
+ 				status = "disabled";
+ 			};
+ 		};
+ 
+ 			timers12: timers@40001800 {
+ 			#address-cells = <1>;
+ 			#size-cells = <0>;
+ 			compatible = "st,stm32-timers";
+ 			reg = <0x40001800 0x400>;
+ 			clocks = <&rcc 0 134>;
+ 			clock-names = "int";
+ 			status = "disabled";
+ 
+ 			pwm {
+ 				compatible = "st,stm32-pwm";
+ 				status = "disabled";
+ 			};
+ 
+ 			timer@11 {
+ 				compatible = "st,stm32-timer-trigger";
+ 				reg = <11>;
+ 				status = "disabled";
+ 			};
+ 		};
+ 
+ 		timers13: timers@40001c00 {
+ 			#address-cells = <1>;
+ 			#size-cells = <0>;
+ 			compatible = "st,stm32-timers";
+ 			reg = <0x40001C00 0x400>;
+ 			clocks = <&rcc 0 135>;
+ 			clock-names = "int";
+ 			status = "disabled";
+ 
+ 			pwm {
+ 				compatible = "st,stm32-pwm";
+ 				status = "disabled";
+ 			};
+ 		};
+ 
+ 		timers14: timers@40002000 {
+ 			#address-cells = <1>;
+ 			#size-cells = <0>;
+ 			compatible = "st,stm32-timers";
+ 			reg = <0x40002000 0x400>;
+ 			clocks = <&rcc 0 136>;
+ 			clock-names = "int";
+ 			status = "disabled";
+ 
+ 			pwm {
+ 				compatible = "st,stm32-pwm";
+ 				status = "disabled";
+ 			};
+ 		};
+ 
 +		rtc: rtc@40002800 {
 +			compatible = "st,stm32-rtc";
 +			reg = <0x40002800 0x400>;
 +			clocks = <&rcc 1 CLK_RTC>;
 +			clock-names = "ck_rtc";
 +			assigned-clocks = <&rcc 1 CLK_RTC>;
 +			assigned-clock-parents = <&rcc 1 CLK_LSE>;
 +			interrupt-parent = <&exti>;
 +			interrupts = <17 1>;
 +			interrupt-names = "alarm";
 +			st,syscfg = <&pwrcfg>;
 +			status = "disabled";
 +		};
 +
  		usart2: serial@40004400 {
  			compatible = "st,stm32-usart", "st,stm32-uart";
  			reg = <0x40004400 0x400>;
@@@ -433,11 -616,20 +693,26 @@@
  				};
  			};
  
 +			adc3_in8_pin: adc@200 {
 +				pins {
 +					pinmux = <STM32F429_PF10_FUNC_ANALOG>;
 +				};
 +			};
++
+ 			pwm1_pins: pwm@1 {
+ 				pins {
+ 					pinmux = <STM32F429_PA8_FUNC_TIM1_CH1>,
+ 						 <STM32F429_PB13_FUNC_TIM1_CH1N>,
+ 						 <STM32F429_PB12_FUNC_TIM1_BKIN>;
+ 				};
+ 			};
+ 
+ 			pwm3_pins: pwm@3 {
+ 				pins {
+ 					pinmux = <STM32F429_PB4_FUNC_TIM3_CH1>,
+ 						 <STM32F429_PB5_FUNC_TIM3_CH2>;
+ 				};
+ 			};
  		};
  
  		rcc: rcc@40023810 {

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

linux-next: manual merge of the mfd tree with the arm-soc tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2017-01-24 03:50 +0100
  Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mfd tree with the arm-soc tree Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2017-01-24 09:20 +0100

csiph-web