Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1493097 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-09-29 04:20 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-10-03 15:40 +0200 |
| Articles | 5 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
[PATCH V4 04/10] dmaengine: qcom_hidma: configure DMA and MSI for OF Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> - 2016-09-29 04:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH V4 04/10] dmaengine: qcom_hidma: configure DMA and MSI for OF Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> - 2016-10-01 08:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH V4 04/10] dmaengine: qcom_hidma: configure DMA and MSI for OF Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> - 2016-10-01 17:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH V4 04/10] dmaengine: qcom_hidma: configure DMA and MSI for OF Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> - 2016-10-03 05:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH V4 04/10] dmaengine: qcom_hidma: configure DMA and MSI for OF Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> - 2016-10-03 15:40 +0200
| From | Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-29 04:20 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH V4 04/10] dmaengine: qcom_hidma: configure DMA and MSI for OF |
| Message-ID | <smz74-6wm-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Configure the DMA bindings for the device tree based firmware. Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> --- drivers/dma/qcom/hidma_mgmt.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/dma/qcom/hidma_mgmt.c b/drivers/dma/qcom/hidma_mgmt.c index 82f36e4..e8f6b84 100644 --- a/drivers/dma/qcom/hidma_mgmt.c +++ b/drivers/dma/qcom/hidma_mgmt.c @@ -375,8 +375,11 @@ static int __init hidma_mgmt_of_populate_channels(struct device_node *np) ret = PTR_ERR(new_pdev); goto out; } + of_node_get(child); + new_pdev->dev.of_node = child; of_dma_configure(&new_pdev->dev, child); - + of_msi_configure(&new_pdev->dev, child); + of_node_put(child); kfree(res); res = NULL; } -- 1.9.1
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-01 08:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH V4 04/10] dmaengine: qcom_hidma: configure DMA and MSI for OF |
| Message-ID | <snlEK-4sh-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1493097 |
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 10:12:41PM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote: > Configure the DMA bindings for the device tree based firmware. > > Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> > --- > drivers/dma/qcom/hidma_mgmt.c | 5 ++++- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/dma/qcom/hidma_mgmt.c b/drivers/dma/qcom/hidma_mgmt.c > index 82f36e4..e8f6b84 100644 > --- a/drivers/dma/qcom/hidma_mgmt.c > +++ b/drivers/dma/qcom/hidma_mgmt.c > @@ -375,8 +375,11 @@ static int __init hidma_mgmt_of_populate_channels(struct device_node *np) > ret = PTR_ERR(new_pdev); > goto out; > } > + of_node_get(child); > + new_pdev->dev.of_node = child; > of_dma_configure(&new_pdev->dev, child); > - > + of_msi_configure(&new_pdev->dev, child); > + of_node_put(child); should this be done unconditionally? Dont we needto call this only for platforms with msi? > kfree(res); > res = NULL; > } > -- > 1.9.1 > -- ~Vinod
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-01 17:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH V4 04/10] dmaengine: qcom_hidma: configure DMA and MSI for OF |
| Message-ID | <snuf0-1Sl-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1494360 |
On 10/1/2016 2:17 AM, Vinod Koul wrote: > On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 10:12:41PM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote: >> Configure the DMA bindings for the device tree based firmware. >> >> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> >> --- >> drivers/dma/qcom/hidma_mgmt.c | 5 ++++- >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/dma/qcom/hidma_mgmt.c b/drivers/dma/qcom/hidma_mgmt.c >> index 82f36e4..e8f6b84 100644 >> --- a/drivers/dma/qcom/hidma_mgmt.c >> +++ b/drivers/dma/qcom/hidma_mgmt.c >> @@ -375,8 +375,11 @@ static int __init hidma_mgmt_of_populate_channels(struct device_node *np) >> ret = PTR_ERR(new_pdev); >> goto out; >> } >> + of_node_get(child); >> + new_pdev->dev.of_node = child; >> of_dma_configure(&new_pdev->dev, child); >> - >> + of_msi_configure(&new_pdev->dev, child); >> + of_node_put(child); > > should this be done unconditionally? Dont we needto call this only for > platforms with msi? I followed the pattern in of_platform_device_create_pdata function. of_msi_configure does nothing if MSI is not enabled as irq_find_matching_host returns NULL. It didn't have any side effects on my testing either. > >> kfree(res); >> res = NULL; >> } >> -- >> 1.9.1 >> > -- Sinan Kaya Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-03 05:40 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH V4 04/10] dmaengine: qcom_hidma: configure DMA and MSI for OF |
| Message-ID | <so2gG-79T-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1494429 |
On Sat, Oct 01, 2016 at 11:15:00AM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote: > On 10/1/2016 2:17 AM, Vinod Koul wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 10:12:41PM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote: > >> Configure the DMA bindings for the device tree based firmware. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> > >> --- > >> drivers/dma/qcom/hidma_mgmt.c | 5 ++++- > >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/dma/qcom/hidma_mgmt.c b/drivers/dma/qcom/hidma_mgmt.c > >> index 82f36e4..e8f6b84 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/dma/qcom/hidma_mgmt.c > >> +++ b/drivers/dma/qcom/hidma_mgmt.c > >> @@ -375,8 +375,11 @@ static int __init hidma_mgmt_of_populate_channels(struct device_node *np) > >> ret = PTR_ERR(new_pdev); > >> goto out; > >> } > >> + of_node_get(child); > >> + new_pdev->dev.of_node = child; > >> of_dma_configure(&new_pdev->dev, child); > >> - > >> + of_msi_configure(&new_pdev->dev, child); > >> + of_node_put(child); > > > > should this be done unconditionally? Dont we needto call this only for > > platforms with msi? > > I followed the pattern in of_platform_device_create_pdata function. of_msi_configure does > nothing if MSI is not enabled as irq_find_matching_host returns NULL. It didn't have any > side effects on my testing either. yeah later on I did look up the of_msi_configure() and I suspected this. I think it would be worthwhile to document this assumption here. Thanks -- ~Vinod
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-03 15:40 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH V4 04/10] dmaengine: qcom_hidma: configure DMA and MSI for OF |
| Message-ID | <sobDj-5y2-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1494691 |
On 10/2/2016 11:38 PM, Vinod Koul wrote: >> I followed the pattern in of_platform_device_create_pdata function. of_msi_configure does >> > nothing if MSI is not enabled as irq_find_matching_host returns NULL. It didn't have any >> > side effects on my testing either. > yeah later on I did look up the of_msi_configure() and I suspected this. I > think it would be worthwhile to document this assumption here. Sure, let me do that. -- Sinan Kaya Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web