Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1515314 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Markus Mayer <code@mmayer.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-11-04 18:00 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-11-07 06:40 +0100 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
[PATCH v2 1/2] cpufreq: add new attribute type cpufreq_freq_attr_wr_perm() Markus Mayer <code@mmayer.net> - 2016-11-04 18:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] cpufreq: add new attribute type cpufreq_freq_attr_wr_perm() Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-11-07 05:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] cpufreq: add new attribute type cpufreq_freq_attr_wr_perm() Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-11-07 06:40 +0100
| From | Markus Mayer <code@mmayer.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-04 18:00 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCH v2 1/2] cpufreq: add new attribute type cpufreq_freq_attr_wr_perm() |
| Message-ID | <szQ0q-4l3-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
From: Markus Mayer <mmayer@broadcom.com>
With the new attribute type, it is possible to create write-only
CPUfreq attributes.
Signed-off-by: Markus Mayer <mmayer@broadcom.com>
---
include/linux/cpufreq.h | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
index 5fa55fc..ed09930 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
@@ -234,6 +234,10 @@ __ATTR(_name, _perm, show_##_name, NULL)
static struct freq_attr _name = \
__ATTR(_name, 0644, show_##_name, store_##_name)
+#define cpufreq_freq_attr_wr_perm(_name, _perm) \
+static struct freq_attr _name = \
+__ATTR(_name, _perm, NULL, store_##_name)
+
struct global_attr {
struct attribute attr;
ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj,
--
2.7.4
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-07 05:40 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] cpufreq: add new attribute type cpufreq_freq_attr_wr_perm() |
| Message-ID | <sAJSV-6w9-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1515314 |
On 07-11-16, 10:03, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 04-11-16, 09:55, Markus Mayer wrote: > > From: Markus Mayer <mmayer@broadcom.com> > > > > With the new attribute type, it is possible to create write-only > > CPUfreq attributes. > > > > Signed-off-by: Markus Mayer <mmayer@broadcom.com> > > --- > > include/linux/cpufreq.h | 4 ++++ > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h > > index 5fa55fc..ed09930 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h > > +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h > > @@ -234,6 +234,10 @@ __ATTR(_name, _perm, show_##_name, NULL) > > static struct freq_attr _name = \ > > __ATTR(_name, 0644, show_##_name, store_##_name) > > > > +#define cpufreq_freq_attr_wr_perm(_name, _perm) \ > > shouldn't this be _wo_perm ? > > Also, I wouldn't mind doing this in the second patch itself. Also there is no need to define a _perm variant here, and then you can avoid sending 0200 as argument as well. -- viresh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-07 06:40 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] cpufreq: add new attribute type cpufreq_freq_attr_wr_perm() |
| Message-ID | <sAJSV-6w9-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1515314 |
On 04-11-16, 09:55, Markus Mayer wrote:
> From: Markus Mayer <mmayer@broadcom.com>
>
> With the new attribute type, it is possible to create write-only
> CPUfreq attributes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Mayer <mmayer@broadcom.com>
> ---
> include/linux/cpufreq.h | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> index 5fa55fc..ed09930 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> @@ -234,6 +234,10 @@ __ATTR(_name, _perm, show_##_name, NULL)
> static struct freq_attr _name = \
> __ATTR(_name, 0644, show_##_name, store_##_name)
>
> +#define cpufreq_freq_attr_wr_perm(_name, _perm) \
shouldn't this be _wo_perm ?
Also, I wouldn't mind doing this in the second patch itself.
> +static struct freq_attr _name = \
> +__ATTR(_name, _perm, NULL, store_##_name)
> +
> struct global_attr {
> struct attribute attr;
> ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj,
> --
> 2.7.4
--
viresh
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web