Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1515850
| From | Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] cpufreq: add new attribute type cpufreq_freq_attr_wr_perm() |
| Date | 2016-11-07 06:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sAJSV-6w9-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <szQ0q-4l3-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <szQ0q-4l3-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 04-11-16, 09:55, Markus Mayer wrote:
> From: Markus Mayer <mmayer@broadcom.com>
>
> With the new attribute type, it is possible to create write-only
> CPUfreq attributes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Mayer <mmayer@broadcom.com>
> ---
> include/linux/cpufreq.h | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> index 5fa55fc..ed09930 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> @@ -234,6 +234,10 @@ __ATTR(_name, _perm, show_##_name, NULL)
> static struct freq_attr _name = \
> __ATTR(_name, 0644, show_##_name, store_##_name)
>
> +#define cpufreq_freq_attr_wr_perm(_name, _perm) \
shouldn't this be _wo_perm ?
Also, I wouldn't mind doing this in the second patch itself.
> +static struct freq_attr _name = \
> +__ATTR(_name, _perm, NULL, store_##_name)
> +
> struct global_attr {
> struct attribute attr;
> ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj,
> --
> 2.7.4
--
viresh
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v2 1/2] cpufreq: add new attribute type cpufreq_freq_attr_wr_perm() Markus Mayer <code@mmayer.net> - 2016-11-04 18:00 +0100 Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] cpufreq: add new attribute type cpufreq_freq_attr_wr_perm() Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-11-07 05:40 +0100 Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] cpufreq: add new attribute type cpufreq_freq_attr_wr_perm() Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-11-07 06:40 +0100
csiph-web