Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1375805 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-04-11 15:00 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-04-11 16:50 +0200 |
| Articles | 5 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH v8 3/3] irqchip: add nps Internal and external irqchips Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2016-04-11 15:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v8 3/3] irqchip: add nps Internal and external irqchips Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com> - 2016-04-11 15:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v8 3/3] irqchip: add nps Internal and external irqchips Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net> - 2016-04-11 15:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v8 3/3] irqchip: add nps Internal and external irqchips Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com> - 2016-04-11 16:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v8 3/3] irqchip: add nps Internal and external irqchips Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2016-04-11 16:50 +0200
| From | Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-11 15:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v8 3/3] irqchip: add nps Internal and external irqchips |
| Message-ID | <rmJBE-655-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On 03/04/16 19:14, Noam Camus wrote: > From: Noam Camus <noamc@ezchip.com> > > Adding EZchip NPS400 support. > Internal interrupts are handled by Multi Thread Manager (MTM) > Once interrupt is serviced MTM is acked for deactivating the interrupt. > External interrupts are handled by MTM as well as at Global Interrupt > Controller (GIC) e.g. serial and network devices. > > Signed-off-by: Noam Camus <noamc@ezchip.com> > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> > Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net> > Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> > Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-11 15:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rmKem-6GA-43@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1375805 |
On Monday 11 April 2016 06:23 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On 03/04/16 19:14, Noam Camus wrote: >> From: Noam Camus <noamc@ezchip.com> >> >> Adding EZchip NPS400 support. >> Internal interrupts are handled by Multi Thread Manager (MTM) >> Once interrupt is serviced MTM is acked for deactivating the interrupt. >> External interrupts are handled by MTM as well as at Global Interrupt >> Controller (GIC) e.g. serial and network devices. >> >> Signed-off-by: Noam Camus <noamc@ezchip.com> >> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> >> Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net> >> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> >> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> > Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Thx Marc. Thomas, how do you prefer to merge this for 4.7. There is a dependency on a soc header. Are you OK if I take the series via ARC tree. -Vineet > > M.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-11 15:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rmKo4-6L0-67@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1375878 |
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 01:35:58PM +0000, Vineet Gupta wrote: > Thomas, how do you prefer to merge this for 4.7. There is a dependency on a soc > header. Are you OK if I take the series via ARC tree. fwiw, merge conflicts should be trivial/non-existant for irqchip. I'm see no problem with this going via the ARC tree. Acked-by: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net> thx, Jason.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-11 16:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rmKR5-7gk-35@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1375805 |
On Monday 11 April 2016 06:41 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote: >> >> It doesn't mean I really approve of it. The default domain thing is >> >> going to end-up biting you in the rear. But hey, better having this >> >> supported upstream than leaving these patches up in the air... Hi Marc, Aside of this - there's been serious rework of ARC intc / timers code spurred by some of your comments for this irqchip driver. - We now probe timers via DT (so timer irq comes off of DT as well) - We have now switched to linear irq domain (vs. legacy) IMHO a bunch of ugliness / non-desirability remains (there's likely more) - calling irq_set_default_host() - calling irq_create_mapping with NULL for IPIs I really want to do things in better way - make it more modern ... hence would request you to please take a look at my latest series (I can post the patches here if that helps - although it felt I was spamming you and you got pissed off or something and were not responding of late :-) git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vgupta/arc.git #for-next Pray tell me, what is not right and I'm all up for fixing it Thx, -Vineet
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-11 16:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rmLk6-7vl-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1376014 |
Hi Vineet, On 11/04/16 15:09, Vineet Gupta wrote: > On Monday 11 April 2016 06:41 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote: >>>>> It doesn't mean I really approve of it. The default domain thing is >>>>> going to end-up biting you in the rear. But hey, better having this >>>>> supported upstream than leaving these patches up in the air... > > Hi Marc, > > Aside of this - there's been serious rework of ARC intc / timers code spurred by > some of your comments for this irqchip driver. > > - We now probe timers via DT (so timer irq comes off of DT as well) > - We have now switched to linear irq domain (vs. legacy) > > IMHO a bunch of ugliness / non-desirability remains (there's likely more) > - calling irq_set_default_host() > - calling irq_create_mapping with NULL for IPIs > > I really want to do things in better way - make it more modern ... hence would > request you to please take a look at my latest series (I can post the patches here > if that helps - although it felt I was spamming you and you got pissed off or > something and were not responding of late :-) No, it is just that my bandwidth has been max'd out over the past few months. There is only so many patches I can look at while still being able to write some code myself, and I may have flagged your emails as "things to look at when I have time", which may not have happened in a timely manner - sorry about that. Just keep me on CC when you repost them, and I'll try to be a bit more reactive. Thanks, M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web