Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1369211 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-04-01 13:10 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-04-01 13:10 +0200 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 21 — 5 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH 0/11] introduce down_write_killable for rw_semaphore v2 Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-04-01 13:10 +0200
[PATCH 11/11] locking, rwsem: provide down_write_killable Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-04-01 13:10 +0200
[PATCH 10/11] x86, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-04-01 13:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 10/11] x86, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-04-06 20:40 +0200
[PATCH 04/11] alpha, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-04-01 13:10 +0200
[PATCH 01/11] locking, rwsem: get rid of __down_write_nested Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-04-01 13:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 01/11] locking, rwsem: get rid of __down_write_nested Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> - 2016-04-02 02:30 +0200
[PATCH 02/11] locking, rwsem: drop explicit memory barriers Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-04-01 13:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 02/11] locking, rwsem: drop explicit memory barriers Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> - 2016-04-02 03:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 02/11] locking, rwsem: drop explicit memory barriers Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-04-04 11:10 +0200
[PATCH 2/2] sh, rwsem: drop superfluous arch specific implementation Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-04-04 11:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/2] sh, rwsem: drop superfluous arch specific implementation Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-04-06 11:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/2] sh, rwsem: drop superfluous arch specific implementation Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2016-04-06 12:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/2] sh, rwsem: drop superfluous arch specific implementation Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-04-06 12:30 +0200
[PATCH 1/2] xtensa, rwsem: drop superfluous arch specific implementation Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-04-04 11:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] xtensa, rwsem: drop superfluous arch specific implementation Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 12:30 +0200
[PATCH] sparc, rwsem: drop superfluous arch specific implementation Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-04-06 11:10 +0200
[PATCH 07/11] sh, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-04-01 13:10 +0200
[PATCH 08/11] sparc, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-04-01 13:10 +0200
[PATCH 05/11] ia64, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-04-01 13:10 +0200
[PATCH 06/11] s390, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-04-01 13:10 +0200
Page 1 of 2 [1] 2 Next page →
| From | Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-01 13:10 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH 0/11] introduce down_write_killable for rw_semaphore v2 |
| Message-ID | <rj57H-3qc-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hi,
the following patchset implements a killable variant of write lock
for rw_semaphore. My usecase is to turn as many mmap_sem write users
to use a killable variant which will be helpful for the oom_reaper
merged in 4.6-rc1 (aac453635549 ("mm, oom: introduce oom reaper")) to
asynchronously tear down the oom victim address space which requires
mmap_sem for read. This will reduce a likelihood of OOM livelocks caused
by oom victim being stuck on a lock or other resource which prevents it
to reach its exit path and release the memory. I haven't implemented the
killable variant of the read lock because I do not have any usecase for
this API.
The previous version of this series was posted [1] and the only change
since than was the rebase on top of 4.5 (with a clean merge to 4.6-rc1) and
Patch3 was updated to only check for fatal signals when the caller would
block - aka trylock will get the lock even when signals are pending to
be in sync with mutex implementation as per Peter Zijlstra.
The patchset is organized as follows.
- Patch 1 is a trivial cleanup
- Patch 2, I belive, shouldn't introduce any functional changes as per
Documentation/memory-barriers.txt.
- Patch 3 is the preparatory work and necessary infrastructure for
down_write_killable. It implements generic __down_write_killable
and prepares the write lock slow path to bail out earlier when told so
- Patch 4-1 are implementing arch specific __down_write_killable. One
patch per architecture.
- finally patch 11 implements down_write_killable and ties everything
together. I am not really an expert on lockdep so I hope I got it right.
Follow up patches to change mmap_sem write users to killable form is not
part of the series because that will be routed via mmotm tree later on.
I have tested on x86 with OOM situations with high mmap_sem contention
(basically many parallel page faults racing with many parallel mmap/munmap
tight loops) so the waiters for the write locks are routinely interrupted
by SIGKILL.
Thanks!
Shortlog says:
Michal Hocko (11):
locking, rwsem: get rid of __down_write_nested
locking, rwsem: drop explicit memory barriers
locking, rwsem: introduce basis for down_write_killable
alpha, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable
ia64, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable
s390, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable
sh, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable
sparc, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable
xtensa, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable
x86, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable
locking, rwsem: provide down_write_killable
And diffstat:
arch/alpha/include/asm/rwsem.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
arch/ia64/include/asm/rwsem.h | 22 ++++++++++++++++++---
arch/s390/include/asm/rwsem.h | 18 ++++++++++++++----
arch/sh/include/asm/rwsem.h | 32 +++++++++++++++----------------
arch/sparc/include/asm/rwsem.h | 14 +++++++++++---
arch/x86/include/asm/rwsem.h | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
arch/x86/lib/rwsem.S | 8 ++++++++
arch/xtensa/include/asm/rwsem.h | 27 ++++++++++++++------------
include/asm-generic/rwsem.h | 13 ++++++++++---
include/linux/lockdep.h | 15 +++++++++++++++
include/linux/rwsem-spinlock.h | 2 +-
include/linux/rwsem.h | 3 +++
kernel/locking/rwsem-spinlock.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++---
kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------
kernel/locking/rwsem.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
15 files changed, 213 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)
---
[1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1456750705-7141-1-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-01 13:10 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH 11/11] locking, rwsem: provide down_write_killable |
| Message-ID | <rj57I-3qc-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1369211 |
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Now that all the architectures implement the necessary glue code
we can introduce down_write_killable. The only difference wrt. regular
down_write is that the slow path waits in TASK_KILLABLE state and the
interruption by the fatal signal is reported as -EINTR to the caller.
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
---
include/linux/lockdep.h | 15 +++++++++++++++
include/linux/rwsem.h | 1 +
kernel/locking/rwsem.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 35 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/lockdep.h b/include/linux/lockdep.h
index 4dca42fd32f5..13a80779b6da 100644
--- a/include/linux/lockdep.h
+++ b/include/linux/lockdep.h
@@ -446,6 +446,18 @@ do { \
lock_acquired(&(_lock)->dep_map, _RET_IP_); \
} while (0)
+#define LOCK_CONTENDED_RETURN(_lock, try, lock) \
+({ \
+ int ____err = 0; \
+ if (!try(_lock)) { \
+ lock_contended(&(_lock)->dep_map, _RET_IP_); \
+ ____err = lock(_lock); \
+ } \
+ if (!____err) \
+ lock_acquired(&(_lock)->dep_map, _RET_IP_); \
+ ____err; \
+})
+
#else /* CONFIG_LOCK_STAT */
#define lock_contended(lockdep_map, ip) do {} while (0)
@@ -454,6 +466,9 @@ do { \
#define LOCK_CONTENDED(_lock, try, lock) \
lock(_lock)
+#define LOCK_CONTENDED_RETURN(_lock, try, lock) \
+ lock(_lock)
+
#endif /* CONFIG_LOCK_STAT */
#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
diff --git a/include/linux/rwsem.h b/include/linux/rwsem.h
index 7d7ae029dac5..d1c12d160ace 100644
--- a/include/linux/rwsem.h
+++ b/include/linux/rwsem.h
@@ -118,6 +118,7 @@ extern int down_read_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
* lock for writing
*/
extern void down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
+extern int __must_check down_write_killable(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
/*
* trylock for writing -- returns 1 if successful, 0 if contention
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
index 205be0ce34de..c817216c1615 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
@@ -55,6 +55,25 @@ void __sched down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
EXPORT_SYMBOL(down_write);
/*
+ * lock for writing
+ */
+int __sched down_write_killable(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+{
+ might_sleep();
+ rwsem_acquire(&sem->dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_);
+
+ if (LOCK_CONTENDED_RETURN(sem, __down_write_trylock, __down_write_killable)) {
+ rwsem_release(&sem->dep_map, 1, _RET_IP_);
+ return -EINTR;
+ }
+
+ rwsem_set_owner(sem);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(down_write_killable);
+
+/*
* trylock for writing -- returns 1 if successful, 0 if contention
*/
int down_write_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
--
2.8.0.rc3
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-01 13:10 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH 10/11] x86, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable |
| Message-ID | <rj57I-3qc-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1369211 |
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
which uses the same fast path as __down_write except it falls back to
call_rwsem_down_write_failed_killable slow path and return -EINTR if
killed. To prevent from code duplication extract the skeleton of
__down_write into a helper macro which just takes the semaphore
and the slow path function to be called.
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/rwsem.h | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
arch/x86/lib/rwsem.S | 8 ++++++++
2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/rwsem.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/rwsem.h
index d79a218675bc..4c3d90dbe89a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/rwsem.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/rwsem.h
@@ -99,21 +99,36 @@ static inline int __down_read_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
/*
* lock for writing
*/
+#define ____down_write(sem, slow_path) \
+({ \
+ long tmp; \
+ struct rw_semaphore* ret = sem; \
+ asm volatile("# beginning down_write\n\t" \
+ LOCK_PREFIX " xadd %1,(%2)\n\t" \
+ /* adds 0xffff0001, returns the old value */ \
+ " test " __ASM_SEL(%w1,%k1) "," __ASM_SEL(%w1,%k1) "\n\t" \
+ /* was the active mask 0 before? */\
+ " jz 1f\n" \
+ " call " slow_path "\n" \
+ "1:\n" \
+ "# ending down_write" \
+ : "+m" (sem->count), "=d" (tmp), "+a" (ret) \
+ : "a" (sem), "1" (RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS) \
+ : "memory", "cc"); \
+ ret; \
+})
+
static inline void __down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
{
- long tmp;
- asm volatile("# beginning down_write\n\t"
- LOCK_PREFIX " xadd %1,(%2)\n\t"
- /* adds 0xffff0001, returns the old value */
- " test " __ASM_SEL(%w1,%k1) "," __ASM_SEL(%w1,%k1) "\n\t"
- /* was the active mask 0 before? */
- " jz 1f\n"
- " call call_rwsem_down_write_failed\n"
- "1:\n"
- "# ending down_write"
- : "+m" (sem->count), "=d" (tmp)
- : "a" (sem), "1" (RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS)
- : "memory", "cc");
+ ____down_write(sem, "call_rwsem_down_write_failed");
+}
+
+static inline int __down_write_killable(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+{
+ if (IS_ERR(____down_write(sem, "call_rwsem_down_write_failed_killable")))
+ return -EINTR;
+
+ return 0;
}
/*
diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/rwsem.S b/arch/x86/lib/rwsem.S
index 40027db99140..d1a1397e1fb3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/lib/rwsem.S
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/rwsem.S
@@ -101,6 +101,14 @@ ENTRY(call_rwsem_down_write_failed)
ret
ENDPROC(call_rwsem_down_write_failed)
+ENTRY(call_rwsem_down_write_failed_killable)
+ save_common_regs
+ movq %rax,%rdi
+ call rwsem_down_write_failed_killable
+ restore_common_regs
+ ret
+ENDPROC(call_rwsem_down_write_failed_killable)
+
ENTRY(call_rwsem_wake)
/* do nothing if still outstanding active readers */
__ASM_HALF_SIZE(dec) %__ASM_HALF_REG(dx)
--
2.8.0.rc3
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-06 20:40 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 10/11] x86, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable |
| Message-ID | <rl0wW-8ai-25@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1369213 |
On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 01:04:54PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/rwsem.S b/arch/x86/lib/rwsem.S > index 40027db99140..d1a1397e1fb3 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/lib/rwsem.S > +++ b/arch/x86/lib/rwsem.S > @@ -101,6 +101,14 @@ ENTRY(call_rwsem_down_write_failed) > ret > ENDPROC(call_rwsem_down_write_failed) > > +ENTRY(call_rwsem_down_write_failed_killable) > + save_common_regs > + movq %rax,%rdi > + call rwsem_down_write_failed_killable > + restore_common_regs > + ret > +ENDPROC(call_rwsem_down_write_failed_killable) > + I had a conflict here and made that: --- a/arch/x86/lib/rwsem.S +++ b/arch/x86/lib/rwsem.S @@ -106,6 +106,16 @@ ENTRY(call_rwsem_down_write_failed) ret ENDPROC(call_rwsem_down_write_failed) +ENTRY(call_rwsem_down_write_failed_killable) + FRAME_BEGIN + save_common_regs + movq %rax,%rdi + call rwsem_down_write_failed_killable + restore_common_regs + FRAME_END + ret +ENDPROC(call_rwsem_down_write_failed_killable) + ENTRY(call_rwsem_wake) FRAME_BEGIN /* do nothing if still outstanding active readers */
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-01 13:10 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH 04/11] alpha, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable |
| Message-ID | <rj57I-3qc-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1369211 |
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Introduce ___down_write for the fast path and reuse it for __down_write
resp. __down_write_killable each using the respective generic slow path
(rwsem_down_write_failed resp. rwsem_down_write_failed_killable).
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
---
arch/alpha/include/asm/rwsem.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/alpha/include/asm/rwsem.h b/arch/alpha/include/asm/rwsem.h
index a83bbea62c67..0131a7058778 100644
--- a/arch/alpha/include/asm/rwsem.h
+++ b/arch/alpha/include/asm/rwsem.h
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static inline int __down_read_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
return res >= 0 ? 1 : 0;
}
-static inline void __down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+static inline long ___down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
{
long oldcount;
#ifndef CONFIG_SMP
@@ -83,10 +83,24 @@ static inline void __down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
:"=&r" (oldcount), "=m" (sem->count), "=&r" (temp)
:"Ir" (RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS), "m" (sem->count) : "memory");
#endif
- if (unlikely(oldcount))
+ return oldcount;
+}
+
+static inline void __down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+{
+ if (unlikely(___down_write(sem)))
rwsem_down_write_failed(sem);
}
+static inline int __down_write_killable(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+{
+ if (unlikely(___down_write(sem)))
+ if (IS_ERR(rwsem_down_write_failed_killable(sem)))
+ return -EINTR;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
/*
* trylock for writing -- returns 1 if successful, 0 if contention
*/
--
2.8.0.rc3
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-01 13:10 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH 01/11] locking, rwsem: get rid of __down_write_nested |
| Message-ID | <rj57J-3qc-29@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1369211 |
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
This is no longer used anywhere and all callers (__down_write) use
0 as a subclass. Ditch __down_write_nested to make the code easier
to follow.
This shouldn't introduce any functional change.
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
---
arch/s390/include/asm/rwsem.h | 7 +------
arch/sh/include/asm/rwsem.h | 5 -----
arch/sparc/include/asm/rwsem.h | 7 +------
arch/x86/include/asm/rwsem.h | 7 +------
include/asm-generic/rwsem.h | 7 +------
include/linux/rwsem-spinlock.h | 1 -
kernel/locking/rwsem-spinlock.c | 7 +------
7 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/rwsem.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/rwsem.h
index 4b43ee7e6776..8e52e72f3efc 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/rwsem.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/rwsem.h
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ static inline int __down_read_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
/*
* lock for writing
*/
-static inline void __down_write_nested(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int subclass)
+static inline void __down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
{
signed long old, new, tmp;
@@ -108,11 +108,6 @@ static inline void __down_write_nested(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int subclass)
rwsem_down_write_failed(sem);
}
-static inline void __down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
- __down_write_nested(sem, 0);
-}
-
/*
* trylock for writing -- returns 1 if successful, 0 if contention
*/
diff --git a/arch/sh/include/asm/rwsem.h b/arch/sh/include/asm/rwsem.h
index edab57265293..a5104bebd1eb 100644
--- a/arch/sh/include/asm/rwsem.h
+++ b/arch/sh/include/asm/rwsem.h
@@ -114,11 +114,6 @@ static inline void __downgrade_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
rwsem_downgrade_wake(sem);
}
-static inline void __down_write_nested(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int subclass)
-{
- __down_write(sem);
-}
-
/*
* implement exchange and add functionality
*/
diff --git a/arch/sparc/include/asm/rwsem.h b/arch/sparc/include/asm/rwsem.h
index 069bf4d663a1..e5a0d575bc7f 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/include/asm/rwsem.h
+++ b/arch/sparc/include/asm/rwsem.h
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ static inline int __down_read_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
/*
* lock for writing
*/
-static inline void __down_write_nested(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int subclass)
+static inline void __down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
{
long tmp;
@@ -55,11 +55,6 @@ static inline void __down_write_nested(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int subclass)
rwsem_down_write_failed(sem);
}
-static inline void __down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
- __down_write_nested(sem, 0);
-}
-
static inline int __down_write_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
{
long tmp;
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/rwsem.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/rwsem.h
index cad82c9c2fde..d79a218675bc 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/rwsem.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/rwsem.h
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ static inline int __down_read_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
/*
* lock for writing
*/
-static inline void __down_write_nested(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int subclass)
+static inline void __down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
{
long tmp;
asm volatile("# beginning down_write\n\t"
@@ -116,11 +116,6 @@ static inline void __down_write_nested(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int subclass)
: "memory", "cc");
}
-static inline void __down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
- __down_write_nested(sem, 0);
-}
-
/*
* trylock for writing -- returns 1 if successful, 0 if contention
*/
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/rwsem.h b/include/asm-generic/rwsem.h
index d6d5dc98d7da..b8d8a6cf4ca8 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/rwsem.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/rwsem.h
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ static inline int __down_read_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
/*
* lock for writing
*/
-static inline void __down_write_nested(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int subclass)
+static inline void __down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
{
long tmp;
@@ -63,11 +63,6 @@ static inline void __down_write_nested(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int subclass)
rwsem_down_write_failed(sem);
}
-static inline void __down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
- __down_write_nested(sem, 0);
-}
-
static inline int __down_write_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
{
long tmp;
diff --git a/include/linux/rwsem-spinlock.h b/include/linux/rwsem-spinlock.h
index 561e8615528d..a733a5467e6c 100644
--- a/include/linux/rwsem-spinlock.h
+++ b/include/linux/rwsem-spinlock.h
@@ -34,7 +34,6 @@ struct rw_semaphore {
extern void __down_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
extern int __down_read_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
extern void __down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
-extern void __down_write_nested(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int subclass);
extern int __down_write_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
extern void __up_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
extern void __up_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem-spinlock.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem-spinlock.c
index 3a5048572065..bab26104a5d0 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rwsem-spinlock.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem-spinlock.c
@@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ int __down_read_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
/*
* get a write lock on the semaphore
*/
-void __sched __down_write_nested(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int subclass)
+void __sched __down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
{
struct rwsem_waiter waiter;
struct task_struct *tsk;
@@ -227,11 +227,6 @@ void __sched __down_write_nested(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int subclass)
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
}
-void __sched __down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
- __down_write_nested(sem, 0);
-}
-
/*
* trylock for writing -- returns 1 if successful, 0 if contention
*/
--
2.8.0.rc3
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-02 02:30 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 01/11] locking, rwsem: get rid of __down_write_nested |
| Message-ID | <rjhBU-3Nd-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1369217 |
On Fri, 01 Apr 2016, Michal Hocko wrote: >From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> > >This is no longer used anywhere and all callers (__down_write) use >0 as a subclass. Ditch __down_write_nested to make the code easier >to follow. > >This shouldn't introduce any functional change. > >Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-01 13:10 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH 02/11] locking, rwsem: drop explicit memory barriers |
| Message-ID | <rj57J-3qc-37@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1369211 |
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
sh and xtensa seem to be the only architectures which use explicit
memory barriers for rw_semaphore operations even though they are not
really needed because there is the full memory barrier is always implied
by atomic_{inc,dec,add,sub}_return resp. cmpxchg. Remove them.
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
---
arch/sh/include/asm/rwsem.h | 14 ++------------
arch/xtensa/include/asm/rwsem.h | 14 ++------------
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/sh/include/asm/rwsem.h b/arch/sh/include/asm/rwsem.h
index a5104bebd1eb..f6c951c7a875 100644
--- a/arch/sh/include/asm/rwsem.h
+++ b/arch/sh/include/asm/rwsem.h
@@ -24,9 +24,7 @@
*/
static inline void __down_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
{
- if (atomic_inc_return((atomic_t *)(&sem->count)) > 0)
- smp_wmb();
- else
+ if (atomic_inc_return((atomic_t *)(&sem->count)) <= 0)
rwsem_down_read_failed(sem);
}
@@ -37,7 +35,6 @@ static inline int __down_read_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
while ((tmp = sem->count) >= 0) {
if (tmp == cmpxchg(&sem->count, tmp,
tmp + RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS)) {
- smp_wmb();
return 1;
}
}
@@ -53,9 +50,7 @@ static inline void __down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
tmp = atomic_add_return(RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS,
(atomic_t *)(&sem->count));
- if (tmp == RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS)
- smp_wmb();
- else
+ if (tmp != RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS)
rwsem_down_write_failed(sem);
}
@@ -65,7 +60,6 @@ static inline int __down_write_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
tmp = cmpxchg(&sem->count, RWSEM_UNLOCKED_VALUE,
RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS);
- smp_wmb();
return tmp == RWSEM_UNLOCKED_VALUE;
}
@@ -76,7 +70,6 @@ static inline void __up_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
{
int tmp;
- smp_wmb();
tmp = atomic_dec_return((atomic_t *)(&sem->count));
if (tmp < -1 && (tmp & RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK) == 0)
rwsem_wake(sem);
@@ -87,7 +80,6 @@ static inline void __up_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
*/
static inline void __up_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
{
- smp_wmb();
if (atomic_sub_return(RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS,
(atomic_t *)(&sem->count)) < 0)
rwsem_wake(sem);
@@ -108,7 +100,6 @@ static inline void __downgrade_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
{
int tmp;
- smp_wmb();
tmp = atomic_add_return(-RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS, (atomic_t *)(&sem->count));
if (tmp < 0)
rwsem_downgrade_wake(sem);
@@ -119,7 +110,6 @@ static inline void __downgrade_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
*/
static inline int rwsem_atomic_update(int delta, struct rw_semaphore *sem)
{
- smp_mb();
return atomic_add_return(delta, (atomic_t *)(&sem->count));
}
diff --git a/arch/xtensa/include/asm/rwsem.h b/arch/xtensa/include/asm/rwsem.h
index 249619e7e7f2..593483f6e1ff 100644
--- a/arch/xtensa/include/asm/rwsem.h
+++ b/arch/xtensa/include/asm/rwsem.h
@@ -29,9 +29,7 @@
*/
static inline void __down_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
{
- if (atomic_add_return(1,(atomic_t *)(&sem->count)) > 0)
- smp_wmb();
- else
+ if (atomic_add_return(1,(atomic_t *)(&sem->count)) <= 0)
rwsem_down_read_failed(sem);
}
@@ -42,7 +40,6 @@ static inline int __down_read_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
while ((tmp = sem->count) >= 0) {
if (tmp == cmpxchg(&sem->count, tmp,
tmp + RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS)) {
- smp_wmb();
return 1;
}
}
@@ -58,9 +55,7 @@ static inline void __down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
tmp = atomic_add_return(RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS,
(atomic_t *)(&sem->count));
- if (tmp == RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS)
- smp_wmb();
- else
+ if (tmp != RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS)
rwsem_down_write_failed(sem);
}
@@ -70,7 +65,6 @@ static inline int __down_write_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
tmp = cmpxchg(&sem->count, RWSEM_UNLOCKED_VALUE,
RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS);
- smp_wmb();
return tmp == RWSEM_UNLOCKED_VALUE;
}
@@ -81,7 +75,6 @@ static inline void __up_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
{
int tmp;
- smp_wmb();
tmp = atomic_sub_return(1,(atomic_t *)(&sem->count));
if (tmp < -1 && (tmp & RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK) == 0)
rwsem_wake(sem);
@@ -92,7 +85,6 @@ static inline void __up_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
*/
static inline void __up_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
{
- smp_wmb();
if (atomic_sub_return(RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS,
(atomic_t *)(&sem->count)) < 0)
rwsem_wake(sem);
@@ -113,7 +105,6 @@ static inline void __downgrade_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
{
int tmp;
- smp_wmb();
tmp = atomic_add_return(-RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS, (atomic_t *)(&sem->count));
if (tmp < 0)
rwsem_downgrade_wake(sem);
@@ -124,7 +115,6 @@ static inline void __downgrade_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
*/
static inline int rwsem_atomic_update(int delta, struct rw_semaphore *sem)
{
- smp_mb();
return atomic_add_return(delta, (atomic_t *)(&sem->count));
}
--
2.8.0.rc3
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-02 03:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 02/11] locking, rwsem: drop explicit memory barriers |
| Message-ID | <rjioj-4qq-53@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1369221 |
On Fri, 01 Apr 2016, Michal Hocko wrote:
>From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
>
>sh and xtensa seem to be the only architectures which use explicit
>memory barriers for rw_semaphore operations even though they are not
>really needed because there is the full memory barrier is always implied
>by atomic_{inc,dec,add,sub}_return resp. cmpxchg. Remove them.
Heh, and sh even defines smp_store_mb() with xchg(), which makes the above
even more so.
>
>Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
>---
> arch/sh/include/asm/rwsem.h | 14 ++------------
> arch/xtensa/include/asm/rwsem.h | 14 ++------------
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
I think we can actually get rid of these files altogether. While I don't know the archs,
it does not appear to be implementing any kind of workaround/optimization, which is obviously
the whole purpose of defining per-arch rwsem internals, unless the redundant barriers are
actually the purpose. So we could use the generic rwsem.h (which has optimizations and ACQUIRE/
RELEASE semantics, although nops for either sh or xtensa specifically). A first inspection shows
that the code is in fact the same and continue to use 32bit rwsems.
Thanks,
Davidlohr
>diff --git a/arch/sh/include/asm/rwsem.h b/arch/sh/include/asm/rwsem.h
>index a5104bebd1eb..f6c951c7a875 100644
>--- a/arch/sh/include/asm/rwsem.h
>+++ b/arch/sh/include/asm/rwsem.h
>@@ -24,9 +24,7 @@
> */
> static inline void __down_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> {
>- if (atomic_inc_return((atomic_t *)(&sem->count)) > 0)
>- smp_wmb();
>- else
>+ if (atomic_inc_return((atomic_t *)(&sem->count)) <= 0)
> rwsem_down_read_failed(sem);
> }
>
>@@ -37,7 +35,6 @@ static inline int __down_read_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> while ((tmp = sem->count) >= 0) {
> if (tmp == cmpxchg(&sem->count, tmp,
> tmp + RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS)) {
>- smp_wmb();
> return 1;
> }
> }
>@@ -53,9 +50,7 @@ static inline void __down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
>
> tmp = atomic_add_return(RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS,
> (atomic_t *)(&sem->count));
>- if (tmp == RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS)
>- smp_wmb();
>- else
>+ if (tmp != RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS)
> rwsem_down_write_failed(sem);
> }
>
>@@ -65,7 +60,6 @@ static inline int __down_write_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
>
> tmp = cmpxchg(&sem->count, RWSEM_UNLOCKED_VALUE,
> RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS);
>- smp_wmb();
> return tmp == RWSEM_UNLOCKED_VALUE;
> }
>
>@@ -76,7 +70,6 @@ static inline void __up_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> {
> int tmp;
>
>- smp_wmb();
> tmp = atomic_dec_return((atomic_t *)(&sem->count));
> if (tmp < -1 && (tmp & RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK) == 0)
> rwsem_wake(sem);
>@@ -87,7 +80,6 @@ static inline void __up_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> */
> static inline void __up_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> {
>- smp_wmb();
> if (atomic_sub_return(RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS,
> (atomic_t *)(&sem->count)) < 0)
> rwsem_wake(sem);
>@@ -108,7 +100,6 @@ static inline void __downgrade_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> {
> int tmp;
>
>- smp_wmb();
> tmp = atomic_add_return(-RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS, (atomic_t *)(&sem->count));
> if (tmp < 0)
> rwsem_downgrade_wake(sem);
>@@ -119,7 +110,6 @@ static inline void __downgrade_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> */
> static inline int rwsem_atomic_update(int delta, struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> {
>- smp_mb();
> return atomic_add_return(delta, (atomic_t *)(&sem->count));
> }
>
>diff --git a/arch/xtensa/include/asm/rwsem.h b/arch/xtensa/include/asm/rwsem.h
>index 249619e7e7f2..593483f6e1ff 100644
>--- a/arch/xtensa/include/asm/rwsem.h
>+++ b/arch/xtensa/include/asm/rwsem.h
>@@ -29,9 +29,7 @@
> */
> static inline void __down_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> {
>- if (atomic_add_return(1,(atomic_t *)(&sem->count)) > 0)
>- smp_wmb();
>- else
>+ if (atomic_add_return(1,(atomic_t *)(&sem->count)) <= 0)
> rwsem_down_read_failed(sem);
> }
>
>@@ -42,7 +40,6 @@ static inline int __down_read_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> while ((tmp = sem->count) >= 0) {
> if (tmp == cmpxchg(&sem->count, tmp,
> tmp + RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS)) {
>- smp_wmb();
> return 1;
> }
> }
>@@ -58,9 +55,7 @@ static inline void __down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
>
> tmp = atomic_add_return(RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS,
> (atomic_t *)(&sem->count));
>- if (tmp == RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS)
>- smp_wmb();
>- else
>+ if (tmp != RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS)
> rwsem_down_write_failed(sem);
> }
>
>@@ -70,7 +65,6 @@ static inline int __down_write_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
>
> tmp = cmpxchg(&sem->count, RWSEM_UNLOCKED_VALUE,
> RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS);
>- smp_wmb();
> return tmp == RWSEM_UNLOCKED_VALUE;
> }
>
>@@ -81,7 +75,6 @@ static inline void __up_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> {
> int tmp;
>
>- smp_wmb();
> tmp = atomic_sub_return(1,(atomic_t *)(&sem->count));
> if (tmp < -1 && (tmp & RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK) == 0)
> rwsem_wake(sem);
>@@ -92,7 +85,6 @@ static inline void __up_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> */
> static inline void __up_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> {
>- smp_wmb();
> if (atomic_sub_return(RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS,
> (atomic_t *)(&sem->count)) < 0)
> rwsem_wake(sem);
>@@ -113,7 +105,6 @@ static inline void __downgrade_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> {
> int tmp;
>
>- smp_wmb();
> tmp = atomic_add_return(-RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS, (atomic_t *)(&sem->count));
> if (tmp < 0)
> rwsem_downgrade_wake(sem);
>@@ -124,7 +115,6 @@ static inline void __downgrade_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> */
> static inline int rwsem_atomic_update(int delta, struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> {
>- smp_mb();
> return atomic_add_return(delta, (atomic_t *)(&sem->count));
> }
>
>--
>2.8.0.rc3
>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-04 11:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 02/11] locking, rwsem: drop explicit memory barriers |
| Message-ID | <rk8Ge-NO-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1369765 |
On Fri 01-04-16 18:17:53, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: [...] > I think we can actually get rid of these files altogether. While I > don't know the archs, it does not appear to be implementing any kind > of workaround/optimization, which is obviously the whole purpose of > defining per-arch rwsem internals, unless the redundant barriers are > actually the purpose. So we could use the generic rwsem.h (which has > optimizations and ACQUIRE/ RELEASE semantics, although nops for either > sh or xtensa specifically). A first inspection shows that the code is > in fact the same and continue to use 32bit rwsems. OK, so this has passed my defconfig and allnoconfig for xtensa compile test, allyesconfig has failed due to some unrelated reasons: clk-qoriq.c:(.init.text+0x3ebd3): dangerous relocation: l32r: literal target out of range (try using text-section-literals): (.init.literal+0x17c60) and zillions of similar... The same error is without the patch I do not have a crosscompiler[1] for sh arch so I couldn't have tested it but there shouldn't be any issues in principal. I will send two patches as a follow up. --- [1] https://www.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/files/bin/x86_64/ doesn't seem to have it. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-04 11:10 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH 2/2] sh, rwsem: drop superfluous arch specific implementation |
| Message-ID | <rk8Ge-NO-27@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1370475 |
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
since "locking, rwsem: drop explicit memory barriers" the arch specific
code is basically same as the the generic one so we can drop the
superfluous code.
Suggested-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
---
arch/sh/include/asm/Kbuild | 1 +
arch/sh/include/asm/rwsem.h | 130 --------------------------------------------
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 130 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 arch/sh/include/asm/rwsem.h
diff --git a/arch/sh/include/asm/Kbuild b/arch/sh/include/asm/Kbuild
index aac452b26aa8..6d866c7a9b74 100644
--- a/arch/sh/include/asm/Kbuild
+++ b/arch/sh/include/asm/Kbuild
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ generic-y += percpu.h
generic-y += poll.h
generic-y += preempt.h
generic-y += resource.h
+generic-y += rwsem.h
generic-y += sembuf.h
generic-y += serial.h
generic-y += shmbuf.h
diff --git a/arch/sh/include/asm/rwsem.h b/arch/sh/include/asm/rwsem.h
deleted file mode 100644
index 8a457b83d2a5..000000000000
--- a/arch/sh/include/asm/rwsem.h
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,130 +0,0 @@
-/*
- * include/asm-sh/rwsem.h: R/W semaphores for SH using the stuff
- * in lib/rwsem.c.
- */
-
-#ifndef _ASM_SH_RWSEM_H
-#define _ASM_SH_RWSEM_H
-
-#ifndef _LINUX_RWSEM_H
-#error "please don't include asm/rwsem.h directly, use linux/rwsem.h instead"
-#endif
-
-#ifdef __KERNEL__
-
-#define RWSEM_UNLOCKED_VALUE 0x00000000
-#define RWSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS 0x00000001
-#define RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK 0x0000ffff
-#define RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS (-0x00010000)
-#define RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS RWSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS
-#define RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS (RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS + RWSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS)
-
-/*
- * lock for reading
- */
-static inline void __down_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
- if (atomic_inc_return((atomic_t *)(&sem->count)) <= 0)
- rwsem_down_read_failed(sem);
-}
-
-static inline int __down_read_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
- int tmp;
-
- while ((tmp = sem->count) >= 0) {
- if (tmp == cmpxchg(&sem->count, tmp,
- tmp + RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS)) {
- return 1;
- }
- }
- return 0;
-}
-
-/*
- * lock for writing
- */
-static inline void __down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
- int tmp;
-
- tmp = atomic_add_return(RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS,
- (atomic_t *)(&sem->count));
- if (tmp != RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS)
- rwsem_down_write_failed(sem);
-}
-
-static inline int __down_write_killable(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
- int tmp;
-
- tmp = atomic_add_return(RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS,
- (atomic_t *)(&sem->count));
- if (tmp != RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS)
- if (IS_ERR(rwsem_down_write_failed_killable(sem)))
- return -EINTR;
-
- return 0;
-}
-
-static inline int __down_write_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
- int tmp;
-
- tmp = cmpxchg(&sem->count, RWSEM_UNLOCKED_VALUE,
- RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS);
- return tmp == RWSEM_UNLOCKED_VALUE;
-}
-
-/*
- * unlock after reading
- */
-static inline void __up_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
- int tmp;
-
- tmp = atomic_dec_return((atomic_t *)(&sem->count));
- if (tmp < -1 && (tmp & RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK) == 0)
- rwsem_wake(sem);
-}
-
-/*
- * unlock after writing
- */
-static inline void __up_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
- if (atomic_sub_return(RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS,
- (atomic_t *)(&sem->count)) < 0)
- rwsem_wake(sem);
-}
-
-/*
- * implement atomic add functionality
- */
-static inline void rwsem_atomic_add(int delta, struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
- atomic_add(delta, (atomic_t *)(&sem->count));
-}
-
-/*
- * downgrade write lock to read lock
- */
-static inline void __downgrade_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
- int tmp;
-
- tmp = atomic_add_return(-RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS, (atomic_t *)(&sem->count));
- if (tmp < 0)
- rwsem_downgrade_wake(sem);
-}
-
-/*
- * implement exchange and add functionality
- */
-static inline int rwsem_atomic_update(int delta, struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
- return atomic_add_return(delta, (atomic_t *)(&sem->count));
-}
-
-#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
-#endif /* _ASM_SH_RWSEM_H */
--
2.8.0.rc3
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-06 11:30 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] sh, rwsem: drop superfluous arch specific implementation |
| Message-ID | <rkRWH-1G1-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1370479 |
+Cc maintainers, linux-sh list is very high signal-to-noise as its been
appropriated for renesas arm parts.
On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 11:06:40AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
>
> since "locking, rwsem: drop explicit memory barriers" the arch specific
> code is basically same as the the generic one so we can drop the
> superfluous code.
>
> Suggested-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> ---
> arch/sh/include/asm/Kbuild | 1 +
> arch/sh/include/asm/rwsem.h | 130 --------------------------------------------
> 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 130 deletions(-)
> delete mode 100644 arch/sh/include/asm/rwsem.h
>
> diff --git a/arch/sh/include/asm/Kbuild b/arch/sh/include/asm/Kbuild
> index aac452b26aa8..6d866c7a9b74 100644
> --- a/arch/sh/include/asm/Kbuild
> +++ b/arch/sh/include/asm/Kbuild
> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ generic-y += percpu.h
> generic-y += poll.h
> generic-y += preempt.h
> generic-y += resource.h
> +generic-y += rwsem.h
> generic-y += sembuf.h
> generic-y += serial.h
> generic-y += shmbuf.h
> diff --git a/arch/sh/include/asm/rwsem.h b/arch/sh/include/asm/rwsem.h
> deleted file mode 100644
> index 8a457b83d2a5..000000000000
> --- a/arch/sh/include/asm/rwsem.h
> +++ /dev/null
> @@ -1,130 +0,0 @@
> -/*
> - * include/asm-sh/rwsem.h: R/W semaphores for SH using the stuff
> - * in lib/rwsem.c.
> - */
> -
> -#ifndef _ASM_SH_RWSEM_H
> -#define _ASM_SH_RWSEM_H
> -
> -#ifndef _LINUX_RWSEM_H
> -#error "please don't include asm/rwsem.h directly, use linux/rwsem.h instead"
> -#endif
> -
> -#ifdef __KERNEL__
> -
> -#define RWSEM_UNLOCKED_VALUE 0x00000000
> -#define RWSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS 0x00000001
> -#define RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK 0x0000ffff
> -#define RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS (-0x00010000)
> -#define RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS RWSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS
> -#define RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS (RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS + RWSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS)
> -
> -/*
> - * lock for reading
> - */
> -static inline void __down_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> -{
> - if (atomic_inc_return((atomic_t *)(&sem->count)) <= 0)
> - rwsem_down_read_failed(sem);
> -}
> -
> -static inline int __down_read_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> -{
> - int tmp;
> -
> - while ((tmp = sem->count) >= 0) {
> - if (tmp == cmpxchg(&sem->count, tmp,
> - tmp + RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS)) {
> - return 1;
> - }
> - }
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> -/*
> - * lock for writing
> - */
> -static inline void __down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> -{
> - int tmp;
> -
> - tmp = atomic_add_return(RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS,
> - (atomic_t *)(&sem->count));
> - if (tmp != RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS)
> - rwsem_down_write_failed(sem);
> -}
> -
> -static inline int __down_write_killable(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> -{
> - int tmp;
> -
> - tmp = atomic_add_return(RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS,
> - (atomic_t *)(&sem->count));
> - if (tmp != RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS)
> - if (IS_ERR(rwsem_down_write_failed_killable(sem)))
> - return -EINTR;
> -
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> -static inline int __down_write_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> -{
> - int tmp;
> -
> - tmp = cmpxchg(&sem->count, RWSEM_UNLOCKED_VALUE,
> - RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS);
> - return tmp == RWSEM_UNLOCKED_VALUE;
> -}
> -
> -/*
> - * unlock after reading
> - */
> -static inline void __up_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> -{
> - int tmp;
> -
> - tmp = atomic_dec_return((atomic_t *)(&sem->count));
> - if (tmp < -1 && (tmp & RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK) == 0)
> - rwsem_wake(sem);
> -}
> -
> -/*
> - * unlock after writing
> - */
> -static inline void __up_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> -{
> - if (atomic_sub_return(RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS,
> - (atomic_t *)(&sem->count)) < 0)
> - rwsem_wake(sem);
> -}
> -
> -/*
> - * implement atomic add functionality
> - */
> -static inline void rwsem_atomic_add(int delta, struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> -{
> - atomic_add(delta, (atomic_t *)(&sem->count));
> -}
> -
> -/*
> - * downgrade write lock to read lock
> - */
> -static inline void __downgrade_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> -{
> - int tmp;
> -
> - tmp = atomic_add_return(-RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS, (atomic_t *)(&sem->count));
> - if (tmp < 0)
> - rwsem_downgrade_wake(sem);
> -}
> -
> -/*
> - * implement exchange and add functionality
> - */
> -static inline int rwsem_atomic_update(int delta, struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> -{
> - return atomic_add_return(delta, (atomic_t *)(&sem->count));
> -}
> -
> -#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
> -#endif /* _ASM_SH_RWSEM_H */
> --
> 2.8.0.rc3
>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-06 12:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] sh, rwsem: drop superfluous arch specific implementation |
| Message-ID | <rkSpI-1RZ-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1372323 |
Dag Peter,
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 11:26 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> +Cc maintainers, linux-sh list is very high signal-to-noise as its been
> appropriated for renesas arm parts.
FTR, Renesas ARM parts have moved to linux-renesas-soc.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-06 12:30 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] sh, rwsem: drop superfluous arch specific implementation |
| Message-ID | <rkSSK-2lx-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1372350 |
On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 11:50:00AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Dag Peter, > > On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 11:26 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote: > > +Cc maintainers, linux-sh list is very high signal-to-noise as its been > > appropriated for renesas arm parts. > > FTR, Renesas ARM parts have moved to linux-renesas-soc. Ah, good to know that situation has been sorted. Thanks!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-04 11:10 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH 1/2] xtensa, rwsem: drop superfluous arch specific implementation |
| Message-ID | <rk8Ge-NO-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1370475 |
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
since "locking, rwsem: drop explicit memory barriers" the arch specific
code is basically same as the the generic one so we can drop the
superfluous code.
Suggested-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
---
arch/xtensa/include/asm/Kbuild | 1 +
arch/xtensa/include/asm/rwsem.h | 134 ----------------------------------------
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 134 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 arch/xtensa/include/asm/rwsem.h
diff --git a/arch/xtensa/include/asm/Kbuild b/arch/xtensa/include/asm/Kbuild
index b56855a1382a..28cf4c5d65ef 100644
--- a/arch/xtensa/include/asm/Kbuild
+++ b/arch/xtensa/include/asm/Kbuild
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ generic-y += mm-arch-hooks.h
generic-y += percpu.h
generic-y += preempt.h
generic-y += resource.h
+generic-y += rwsem.h
generic-y += sections.h
generic-y += siginfo.h
generic-y += statfs.h
diff --git a/arch/xtensa/include/asm/rwsem.h b/arch/xtensa/include/asm/rwsem.h
deleted file mode 100644
index 6283823b8040..000000000000
--- a/arch/xtensa/include/asm/rwsem.h
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,134 +0,0 @@
-/*
- * include/asm-xtensa/rwsem.h
- *
- * This file is subject to the terms and conditions of the GNU General Public
- * License. See the file "COPYING" in the main directory of this archive
- * for more details.
- *
- * Largely copied from include/asm-ppc/rwsem.h
- *
- * Copyright (C) 2001 - 2005 Tensilica Inc.
- */
-
-#ifndef _XTENSA_RWSEM_H
-#define _XTENSA_RWSEM_H
-
-#ifndef _LINUX_RWSEM_H
-#error "Please don't include <asm/rwsem.h> directly, use <linux/rwsem.h> instead."
-#endif
-
-#define RWSEM_UNLOCKED_VALUE 0x00000000
-#define RWSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS 0x00000001
-#define RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK 0x0000ffff
-#define RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS (-0x00010000)
-#define RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS RWSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS
-#define RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS (RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS + RWSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS)
-
-/*
- * lock for reading
- */
-static inline void __down_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
- if (atomic_add_return(1,(atomic_t *)(&sem->count)) <= 0)
- rwsem_down_read_failed(sem);
-}
-
-static inline int __down_read_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
- int tmp;
-
- while ((tmp = sem->count) >= 0) {
- if (tmp == cmpxchg(&sem->count, tmp,
- tmp + RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS)) {
- return 1;
- }
- }
- return 0;
-}
-
-/*
- * lock for writing
- */
-static inline void __down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
- int tmp;
-
- tmp = atomic_add_return(RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS,
- (atomic_t *)(&sem->count));
- if (tmp != RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS)
- rwsem_down_write_failed(sem);
-}
-
-static inline int __down_write_killable(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
- int tmp;
-
- tmp = atomic_add_return(RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS,
- (atomic_t *)(&sem->count));
- if (tmp != RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS)
- if (IS_ERR(rwsem_down_write_failed_killable(sem)))
- return -EINTR;
-
- return 0;
-}
-
-static inline int __down_write_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
- int tmp;
-
- tmp = cmpxchg(&sem->count, RWSEM_UNLOCKED_VALUE,
- RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS);
- return tmp == RWSEM_UNLOCKED_VALUE;
-}
-
-/*
- * unlock after reading
- */
-static inline void __up_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
- int tmp;
-
- tmp = atomic_sub_return(1,(atomic_t *)(&sem->count));
- if (tmp < -1 && (tmp & RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK) == 0)
- rwsem_wake(sem);
-}
-
-/*
- * unlock after writing
- */
-static inline void __up_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
- if (atomic_sub_return(RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS,
- (atomic_t *)(&sem->count)) < 0)
- rwsem_wake(sem);
-}
-
-/*
- * implement atomic add functionality
- */
-static inline void rwsem_atomic_add(int delta, struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
- atomic_add(delta, (atomic_t *)(&sem->count));
-}
-
-/*
- * downgrade write lock to read lock
- */
-static inline void __downgrade_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
- int tmp;
-
- tmp = atomic_add_return(-RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS, (atomic_t *)(&sem->count));
- if (tmp < 0)
- rwsem_downgrade_wake(sem);
-}
-
-/*
- * implement exchange and add functionality
- */
-static inline int rwsem_atomic_update(int delta, struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
- return atomic_add_return(delta, (atomic_t *)(&sem->count));
-}
-
-#endif /* _XTENSA_RWSEM_H */
--
2.8.0.rc3
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-04 12:30 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] xtensa, rwsem: drop superfluous arch specific implementation |
| Message-ID | <rk9VF-1Ap-37@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1370481 |
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 12:06 PM, Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> wrote: > From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> > > since "locking, rwsem: drop explicit memory barriers" the arch specific > code is basically same as the the generic one so we can drop the > superfluous code. > > Suggested-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> > Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> > --- > arch/xtensa/include/asm/Kbuild | 1 + > arch/xtensa/include/asm/rwsem.h | 134 ---------------------------------------- > 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 134 deletions(-) > delete mode 100644 arch/xtensa/include/asm/rwsem.h Acked-by: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> -- Thanks. -- Max
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-06 11:10 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH] sparc, rwsem: drop superfluous arch specific implementation |
| Message-ID | <rkRDk-1xY-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1369765 |
[Redicing CC list]
On Fri 01-04-16 18:17:53, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Apr 2016, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
> >arch/sh/include/asm/rwsem.h | 14 ++------------
> >arch/xtensa/include/asm/rwsem.h | 14 ++------------
> >2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> I think we can actually get rid of these files altogether.
And after double checking sparc is using the generic implementation
without any arch specific tweaks as well. So it can be dropped.
David, does the following look good to you or am I missing something?
I will drop "[PATCH 08/11] sparc, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable"
then.
---
From 8a71514d2973f9e5c0330a23e0409d195e796b4c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 10:33:37 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] sparc, rwsem: drop superfluous arch specific implementation
sparc basically reuses generic implementation of rwsem so we can
reuse the code rather than duplicate it.
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
---
arch/sparc/include/asm/Kbuild | 1 +
arch/sparc/include/asm/rwsem.h | 119 -----------------------------------------
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 119 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 arch/sparc/include/asm/rwsem.h
diff --git a/arch/sparc/include/asm/Kbuild b/arch/sparc/include/asm/Kbuild
index e928618838bc..6024c26c0585 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/include/asm/Kbuild
+++ b/arch/sparc/include/asm/Kbuild
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ generic-y += mm-arch-hooks.h
generic-y += module.h
generic-y += mutex.h
generic-y += preempt.h
+generic-y += rwsem.h
generic-y += serial.h
generic-y += trace_clock.h
generic-y += types.h
diff --git a/arch/sparc/include/asm/rwsem.h b/arch/sparc/include/asm/rwsem.h
deleted file mode 100644
index e5a0d575bc7f..000000000000
--- a/arch/sparc/include/asm/rwsem.h
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,119 +0,0 @@
-/*
- * rwsem.h: R/W semaphores implemented using CAS
- *
- * Written by David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com), 2001.
- * Derived from asm-i386/rwsem.h
- */
-#ifndef _SPARC64_RWSEM_H
-#define _SPARC64_RWSEM_H
-
-#ifndef _LINUX_RWSEM_H
-#error "please don't include asm/rwsem.h directly, use linux/rwsem.h instead"
-#endif
-
-#ifdef __KERNEL__
-
-#define RWSEM_UNLOCKED_VALUE 0x00000000L
-#define RWSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS 0x00000001L
-#define RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK 0xffffffffL
-#define RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS (-RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK-1)
-#define RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS RWSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS
-#define RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS (RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS + RWSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS)
-
-/*
- * lock for reading
- */
-static inline void __down_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
- if (unlikely(atomic64_inc_return((atomic64_t *)(&sem->count)) <= 0L))
- rwsem_down_read_failed(sem);
-}
-
-static inline int __down_read_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
- long tmp;
-
- while ((tmp = sem->count) >= 0L) {
- if (tmp == cmpxchg(&sem->count, tmp,
- tmp + RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS)) {
- return 1;
- }
- }
- return 0;
-}
-
-/*
- * lock for writing
- */
-static inline void __down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
- long tmp;
-
- tmp = atomic64_add_return(RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS,
- (atomic64_t *)(&sem->count));
- if (unlikely(tmp != RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS))
- rwsem_down_write_failed(sem);
-}
-
-static inline int __down_write_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
- long tmp;
-
- tmp = cmpxchg(&sem->count, RWSEM_UNLOCKED_VALUE,
- RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS);
- return tmp == RWSEM_UNLOCKED_VALUE;
-}
-
-/*
- * unlock after reading
- */
-static inline void __up_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
- long tmp;
-
- tmp = atomic64_dec_return((atomic64_t *)(&sem->count));
- if (unlikely(tmp < -1L && (tmp & RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK) == 0L))
- rwsem_wake(sem);
-}
-
-/*
- * unlock after writing
- */
-static inline void __up_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
- if (unlikely(atomic64_sub_return(RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS,
- (atomic64_t *)(&sem->count)) < 0L))
- rwsem_wake(sem);
-}
-
-/*
- * implement atomic add functionality
- */
-static inline void rwsem_atomic_add(long delta, struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
- atomic64_add(delta, (atomic64_t *)(&sem->count));
-}
-
-/*
- * downgrade write lock to read lock
- */
-static inline void __downgrade_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
- long tmp;
-
- tmp = atomic64_add_return(-RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS, (atomic64_t *)(&sem->count));
- if (tmp < 0L)
- rwsem_downgrade_wake(sem);
-}
-
-/*
- * implement exchange and add functionality
- */
-static inline long rwsem_atomic_update(long delta, struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
- return atomic64_add_return(delta, (atomic64_t *)(&sem->count));
-}
-
-#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
-
-#endif /* _SPARC64_RWSEM_H */
--
2.8.0.rc3
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-01 13:10 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH 07/11] sh, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable |
| Message-ID | <rj57J-3qc-45@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1369211 |
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
which uses the same fast path as __down_write except it falls back to
rwsem_down_write_failed_killable slow path and return -EINTR if killed.
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
---
arch/sh/include/asm/rwsem.h | 13 +++++++++++++
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/sh/include/asm/rwsem.h b/arch/sh/include/asm/rwsem.h
index f6c951c7a875..8a457b83d2a5 100644
--- a/arch/sh/include/asm/rwsem.h
+++ b/arch/sh/include/asm/rwsem.h
@@ -54,6 +54,19 @@ static inline void __down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
rwsem_down_write_failed(sem);
}
+static inline int __down_write_killable(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+{
+ int tmp;
+
+ tmp = atomic_add_return(RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS,
+ (atomic_t *)(&sem->count));
+ if (tmp != RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS)
+ if (IS_ERR(rwsem_down_write_failed_killable(sem)))
+ return -EINTR;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static inline int __down_write_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
{
int tmp;
--
2.8.0.rc3
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-01 13:10 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH 08/11] sparc, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable |
| Message-ID | <rj57J-3qc-49@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1369211 |
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
which uses the same fast path as __down_write except it falls back to
rwsem_down_write_failed_killable slow path and return -EINTR if killed.
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
---
arch/sparc/include/asm/rwsem.h | 13 +++++++++++++
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/sparc/include/asm/rwsem.h b/arch/sparc/include/asm/rwsem.h
index e5a0d575bc7f..c1e9e32e8b63 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/include/asm/rwsem.h
+++ b/arch/sparc/include/asm/rwsem.h
@@ -55,6 +55,19 @@ static inline void __down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
rwsem_down_write_failed(sem);
}
+static inline int __down_write_killable(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+{
+ long tmp;
+
+ tmp = atomic64_add_return(RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS,
+ (atomic64_t *)(&sem->count));
+ if (unlikely(tmp != RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS))
+ if (IS_ERR(rwsem_down_write_failed_killable(sem)))
+ return -EINTR;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static inline int __down_write_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
{
long tmp;
--
2.8.0.rc3
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-01 13:10 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH 05/11] ia64, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable |
| Message-ID | <rj57J-3qc-43@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1369211 |
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Introduce ___down_write for the fast path and reuse it for __down_write
resp. __down_write_killable each using the respective generic slow path
(rwsem_down_write_failed resp. rwsem_down_write_failed_killable).
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
---
arch/ia64/include/asm/rwsem.h | 22 +++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/ia64/include/asm/rwsem.h b/arch/ia64/include/asm/rwsem.h
index 3027e7516d85..5e78cb40d9df 100644
--- a/arch/ia64/include/asm/rwsem.h
+++ b/arch/ia64/include/asm/rwsem.h
@@ -49,8 +49,8 @@ __down_read (struct rw_semaphore *sem)
/*
* lock for writing
*/
-static inline void
-__down_write (struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+static inline long
+___down_write (struct rw_semaphore *sem)
{
long old, new;
@@ -59,10 +59,26 @@ __down_write (struct rw_semaphore *sem)
new = old + RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS;
} while (cmpxchg_acq(&sem->count, old, new) != old);
- if (old != 0)
+ return old;
+}
+
+static inline void
+__down_write (struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+{
+ if (___down_write(sem))
rwsem_down_write_failed(sem);
}
+static inline int
+__down_write_killable (struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+{
+ if (___down_write(sem))
+ if (IS_ERR(rwsem_down_write_failed_killable(sem)))
+ return -EINTR;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
/*
* unlock after reading
*/
--
2.8.0.rc3
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 2 [1] 2 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web