Re: [PATCH 2/2] sh, rwsem: drop superfluous arch specific implementation

From	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH 2/2] sh, rwsem: drop superfluous arch specific implementation
Date	2016-04-06 12:30 +0200
Message-ID	<rkSSK-2lx-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<rk8Ge-NO-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <rk8Ge-NO-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <rk8Ge-NO-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <rkRWH-1G1-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <rkSpI-1RZ-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 11:50:00AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Dag Peter,
> 
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 11:26 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> > +Cc maintainers, linux-sh list is very high signal-to-noise as its been
> > appropriated for renesas arm parts.
> 
> FTR, Renesas ARM parts have moved to linux-renesas-soc.

Ah, good to know that situation has been sorted.

Thanks!

Thread

Re: [PATCH 02/11] locking, rwsem: drop explicit memory barriers Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-04-04 11:10 +0200
  [PATCH 2/2] sh, rwsem: drop superfluous arch specific implementation Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-04-04 11:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 2/2] sh, rwsem: drop superfluous arch specific  implementation Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-04-06 11:30 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 2/2] sh, rwsem: drop superfluous arch specific implementation Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2016-04-06 12:00 +0200
        Re: [PATCH 2/2] sh, rwsem: drop superfluous arch specific  implementation Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-04-06 12:30 +0200
  [PATCH 1/2] xtensa, rwsem: drop superfluous arch specific implementation Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-04-04 11:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 1/2] xtensa, rwsem: drop superfluous arch specific implementation Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 12:30 +0200

csiph-web