Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1318705 > unrolled thread

[PATCH] rtc: max77686: Cleanup and reduce dmesg output

Started byKrzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
First post2016-01-27 07:50 +0100
Last post2016-01-31 13:10 +0100
Articles 4 — 4 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH] rtc: max77686: Cleanup and reduce dmesg output Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> - 2016-01-27 07:50 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] rtc: max77686: Cleanup and reduce dmesg output Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> - 2016-01-28 01:10 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] rtc: max77686: Cleanup and reduce dmesg output Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@samsung.com> - 2016-01-28 02:20 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] rtc: max77686: Cleanup and reduce dmesg output Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> - 2016-01-31 13:10 +0100

#1318705 — [PATCH] rtc: max77686: Cleanup and reduce dmesg output

FromKrzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Date2016-01-27 07:50 +0100
Subject[PATCH] rtc: max77686: Cleanup and reduce dmesg output
Message-ID<qVs5r-7WF-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Cleanup of entire driver of its dmesg output:
1. Remove printing of the function name, because printing device name is
   sufficient. This also makes the dev_err()-like functions more compact
   and readable (not need of line break).
2. Lower from info to debug printing of each RTC interrupt (no need to
   make noise on each alarm).
3. Remove dev_info() at beginning of probe because a message is already
   always printed by either probe failure or from registering the RTC
   device as /dev/rtcX.

Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>

---

Patch rebased on top of Javier's v4:
[PATCH v4 00/10] rtc: max77686: Extend driver and add max77802 support
http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg477194.html

Feel free to join with these series.
---
 drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c | 39 ++++++++++++++-------------------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c
index da47b1d85793..5a03e1ecad83 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c
@@ -271,8 +271,8 @@ static int max77686_rtc_update(struct max77686_rtc_info *info,
 				 info->drv_data->map[REG_RTC_UPDATE0],
 				 data, data);
 	if (ret < 0)
-		dev_err(info->dev, "%s: fail to write update reg(ret=%d, data=0x%x)\n",
-				__func__, ret, data);
+		dev_err(info->dev, "Fail to write update reg(ret=%d, data=0x%x)\n",
+			ret, data);
 	else {
 		/* Minimum delay required before RTC update. */
 		usleep_range(delay, delay * 2);
@@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ static int max77686_rtc_read_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *tm)
 			       info->drv_data->map[REG_RTC_SEC],
 			       data, ARRAY_SIZE(data));
 	if (ret < 0) {
-		dev_err(info->dev, "%s: fail to read time reg(%d)\n", __func__,	ret);
+		dev_err(info->dev, "Fail to read time reg(%d)\n", ret);
 		goto out;
 	}
 
@@ -326,8 +326,7 @@ static int max77686_rtc_set_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *tm)
 				info->drv_data->map[REG_RTC_SEC],
 				data, ARRAY_SIZE(data));
 	if (ret < 0) {
-		dev_err(info->dev, "%s: fail to write time reg(%d)\n", __func__,
-				ret);
+		dev_err(info->dev, "Fail to write time reg(%d)\n", ret);
 		goto out;
 	}
 
@@ -355,8 +354,7 @@ static int max77686_rtc_read_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alrm)
 	ret = regmap_bulk_read(info->max77686->rtc_regmap,
 			       map[REG_ALARM1_SEC], data, ARRAY_SIZE(data));
 	if (ret < 0) {
-		dev_err(info->dev, "%s:%d fail to read alarm reg(%d)\n",
-				__func__, __LINE__, ret);
+		dev_err(info->dev, "Fail to read alarm reg(%d)\n", ret);
 		goto out;
 	}
 
@@ -394,8 +392,7 @@ static int max77686_rtc_read_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alrm)
 	alrm->pending = 0;
 	ret = regmap_read(info->max77686->regmap, MAX77686_REG_STATUS2, &val);
 	if (ret < 0) {
-		dev_err(info->dev, "%s:%d fail to read status2 reg(%d)\n",
-				__func__, __LINE__, ret);
+		dev_err(info->dev, "Fail to read status2 reg(%d)\n", ret);
 		goto out;
 	}
 
@@ -426,8 +423,7 @@ static int max77686_rtc_stop_alarm(struct max77686_rtc_info *info)
 				       map[REG_ALARM1_SEC], data,
 				       ARRAY_SIZE(data));
 		if (ret < 0) {
-			dev_err(info->dev, "%s: fail to read alarm reg(%d)\n",
-				__func__, ret);
+			dev_err(info->dev, "Fail to read alarm reg(%d)\n", ret);
 			goto out;
 		}
 
@@ -452,8 +448,7 @@ static int max77686_rtc_stop_alarm(struct max77686_rtc_info *info)
 	}
 
 	if (ret < 0) {
-		dev_err(info->dev, "%s: fail to write alarm reg(%d)\n",
-				__func__, ret);
+		dev_err(info->dev, "Fail to write alarm reg(%d)\n", ret);
 		goto out;
 	}
 
@@ -481,8 +476,7 @@ static int max77686_rtc_start_alarm(struct max77686_rtc_info *info)
 				       map[REG_ALARM1_SEC], data,
 				       ARRAY_SIZE(data));
 		if (ret < 0) {
-			dev_err(info->dev, "%s: fail to read alarm reg(%d)\n",
-				__func__, ret);
+			dev_err(info->dev, "Fail to read alarm reg(%d)\n", ret);
 			goto out;
 		}
 
@@ -508,8 +502,7 @@ static int max77686_rtc_start_alarm(struct max77686_rtc_info *info)
 	}
 
 	if (ret < 0) {
-		dev_err(info->dev, "%s: fail to write alarm reg(%d)\n",
-				__func__, ret);
+		dev_err(info->dev, "Fail to write alarm reg(%d)\n", ret);
 		goto out;
 	}
 
@@ -539,8 +532,7 @@ static int max77686_rtc_set_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alrm)
 				data, ARRAY_SIZE(data));
 
 	if (ret < 0) {
-		dev_err(info->dev, "%s: fail to write alarm reg(%d)\n",
-				__func__, ret);
+		dev_err(info->dev, "Fail to write alarm reg(%d)\n", ret);
 		goto out;
 	}
 
@@ -575,7 +567,7 @@ static irqreturn_t max77686_rtc_alarm_irq(int irq, void *data)
 {
 	struct max77686_rtc_info *info = data;
 
-	dev_info(info->dev, "%s:irq(%d)\n", __func__, irq);
+	dev_dbg(info->dev, "RTC alarm IRQ: %d\n", irq);
 
 	rtc_update_irq(info->rtc_dev, 1, RTC_IRQF | RTC_AF);
 
@@ -605,8 +597,7 @@ static int max77686_rtc_init_reg(struct max77686_rtc_info *info)
 				info->drv_data->map[REG_RTC_CONTROLM],
 				data, ARRAY_SIZE(data));
 	if (ret < 0) {
-		dev_err(info->dev, "%s: fail to write controlm reg(%d)\n",
-				__func__, ret);
+		dev_err(info->dev, "Fail to write controlm reg(%d)\n", ret);
 		return ret;
 	}
 
@@ -621,8 +612,6 @@ static int max77686_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	const struct platform_device_id *id = platform_get_device_id(pdev);
 	int ret;
 
-	dev_info(&pdev->dev, "%s\n", __func__);
-
 	info = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(struct max77686_rtc_info),
 				GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!info)
@@ -662,7 +651,7 @@ static int max77686_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	if (!max77686->rtc_irq_data) {
 		ret = -EINVAL;
-		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%s: no RTC regmap IRQ chip\n", __func__);
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "No RTC regmap IRQ chip\n");
 		goto err_rtc;
 	}
 
-- 
1.9.1

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1320158

FromJavier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
Date2016-01-28 01:10 +0100
Message-ID<qVIjU-3hE-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1318705
Hello Krzysztof,

On 01/27/2016 03:46 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Cleanup of entire driver of its dmesg output:
> 1. Remove printing of the function name, because printing device name is
>     sufficient. This also makes the dev_err()-like functions more compact
>     and readable (not need of line break).
> 2. Lower from info to debug printing of each RTC interrupt (no need to
>     make noise on each alarm).
> 3. Remove dev_info() at beginning of probe because a message is already
>     always printed by either probe failure or from registering the RTC
>     device as /dev/rtcX.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
>

Patch looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>

Best regards,
-- 
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1320195

FromAndi Shyti <andi.shyti@samsung.com>
Date2016-01-28 02:20 +0100
Message-ID<qVJpD-42f-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1318705
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 03:46:11PM +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Cleanup of entire driver of its dmesg output:
> 1. Remove printing of the function name, because printing device name is
>    sufficient. This also makes the dev_err()-like functions more compact
>    and readable (not need of line break).
> 2. Lower from info to debug printing of each RTC interrupt (no need to
>    make noise on each alarm).
> 3. Remove dev_info() at beginning of probe because a message is already
>    always printed by either probe failure or from registering the RTC
>    device as /dev/rtcX.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>

Looks good, Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@samsung.com>

> ---
> 
> Patch rebased on top of Javier's v4:
> [PATCH v4 00/10] rtc: max77686: Extend driver and add max77802 support
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg477194.html
> 
> Feel free to join with these series.
> ---
>  drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c | 39 ++++++++++++++-------------------------
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c
> index da47b1d85793..5a03e1ecad83 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c
> @@ -271,8 +271,8 @@ static int max77686_rtc_update(struct max77686_rtc_info *info,
>  				 info->drv_data->map[REG_RTC_UPDATE0],
>  				 data, data);
>  	if (ret < 0)
> -		dev_err(info->dev, "%s: fail to write update reg(ret=%d, data=0x%x)\n",
> -				__func__, ret, data);
> +		dev_err(info->dev, "Fail to write update reg(ret=%d, data=0x%x)\n",
> +			ret, data);
>  	else {
>  		/* Minimum delay required before RTC update. */
>  		usleep_range(delay, delay * 2);
> @@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ static int max77686_rtc_read_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *tm)
>  			       info->drv_data->map[REG_RTC_SEC],
>  			       data, ARRAY_SIZE(data));
>  	if (ret < 0) {
> -		dev_err(info->dev, "%s: fail to read time reg(%d)\n", __func__,	ret);
> +		dev_err(info->dev, "Fail to read time reg(%d)\n", ret);
>  		goto out;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -326,8 +326,7 @@ static int max77686_rtc_set_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *tm)
>  				info->drv_data->map[REG_RTC_SEC],
>  				data, ARRAY_SIZE(data));
>  	if (ret < 0) {
> -		dev_err(info->dev, "%s: fail to write time reg(%d)\n", __func__,
> -				ret);
> +		dev_err(info->dev, "Fail to write time reg(%d)\n", ret);
>  		goto out;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -355,8 +354,7 @@ static int max77686_rtc_read_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alrm)
>  	ret = regmap_bulk_read(info->max77686->rtc_regmap,
>  			       map[REG_ALARM1_SEC], data, ARRAY_SIZE(data));
>  	if (ret < 0) {
> -		dev_err(info->dev, "%s:%d fail to read alarm reg(%d)\n",
> -				__func__, __LINE__, ret);
> +		dev_err(info->dev, "Fail to read alarm reg(%d)\n", ret);
>  		goto out;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -394,8 +392,7 @@ static int max77686_rtc_read_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alrm)
>  	alrm->pending = 0;
>  	ret = regmap_read(info->max77686->regmap, MAX77686_REG_STATUS2, &val);
>  	if (ret < 0) {
> -		dev_err(info->dev, "%s:%d fail to read status2 reg(%d)\n",
> -				__func__, __LINE__, ret);
> +		dev_err(info->dev, "Fail to read status2 reg(%d)\n", ret);
>  		goto out;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -426,8 +423,7 @@ static int max77686_rtc_stop_alarm(struct max77686_rtc_info *info)
>  				       map[REG_ALARM1_SEC], data,
>  				       ARRAY_SIZE(data));
>  		if (ret < 0) {
> -			dev_err(info->dev, "%s: fail to read alarm reg(%d)\n",
> -				__func__, ret);
> +			dev_err(info->dev, "Fail to read alarm reg(%d)\n", ret);
>  			goto out;
>  		}
>  
> @@ -452,8 +448,7 @@ static int max77686_rtc_stop_alarm(struct max77686_rtc_info *info)
>  	}
>  
>  	if (ret < 0) {
> -		dev_err(info->dev, "%s: fail to write alarm reg(%d)\n",
> -				__func__, ret);
> +		dev_err(info->dev, "Fail to write alarm reg(%d)\n", ret);
>  		goto out;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -481,8 +476,7 @@ static int max77686_rtc_start_alarm(struct max77686_rtc_info *info)
>  				       map[REG_ALARM1_SEC], data,
>  				       ARRAY_SIZE(data));
>  		if (ret < 0) {
> -			dev_err(info->dev, "%s: fail to read alarm reg(%d)\n",
> -				__func__, ret);
> +			dev_err(info->dev, "Fail to read alarm reg(%d)\n", ret);
>  			goto out;
>  		}
>  
> @@ -508,8 +502,7 @@ static int max77686_rtc_start_alarm(struct max77686_rtc_info *info)
>  	}
>  
>  	if (ret < 0) {
> -		dev_err(info->dev, "%s: fail to write alarm reg(%d)\n",
> -				__func__, ret);
> +		dev_err(info->dev, "Fail to write alarm reg(%d)\n", ret);
>  		goto out;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -539,8 +532,7 @@ static int max77686_rtc_set_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alrm)
>  				data, ARRAY_SIZE(data));
>  
>  	if (ret < 0) {
> -		dev_err(info->dev, "%s: fail to write alarm reg(%d)\n",
> -				__func__, ret);
> +		dev_err(info->dev, "Fail to write alarm reg(%d)\n", ret);
>  		goto out;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -575,7 +567,7 @@ static irqreturn_t max77686_rtc_alarm_irq(int irq, void *data)
>  {
>  	struct max77686_rtc_info *info = data;
>  
> -	dev_info(info->dev, "%s:irq(%d)\n", __func__, irq);
> +	dev_dbg(info->dev, "RTC alarm IRQ: %d\n", irq);
>  
>  	rtc_update_irq(info->rtc_dev, 1, RTC_IRQF | RTC_AF);
>  
> @@ -605,8 +597,7 @@ static int max77686_rtc_init_reg(struct max77686_rtc_info *info)
>  				info->drv_data->map[REG_RTC_CONTROLM],
>  				data, ARRAY_SIZE(data));
>  	if (ret < 0) {
> -		dev_err(info->dev, "%s: fail to write controlm reg(%d)\n",
> -				__func__, ret);
> +		dev_err(info->dev, "Fail to write controlm reg(%d)\n", ret);
>  		return ret;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -621,8 +612,6 @@ static int max77686_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	const struct platform_device_id *id = platform_get_device_id(pdev);
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	dev_info(&pdev->dev, "%s\n", __func__);
> -
>  	info = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(struct max77686_rtc_info),
>  				GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!info)
> @@ -662,7 +651,7 @@ static int max77686_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>  	if (!max77686->rtc_irq_data) {
>  		ret = -EINVAL;
> -		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%s: no RTC regmap IRQ chip\n", __func__);
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "No RTC regmap IRQ chip\n");
>  		goto err_rtc;
>  	}
>  
> -- 
> 1.9.1

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1322615

FromAlexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
Date2016-01-31 13:10 +0100
Message-ID<qWYZk-35l-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1318705
On 27/01/2016 at 15:46:11 +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote :
> Cleanup of entire driver of its dmesg output:
> 1. Remove printing of the function name, because printing device name is
>    sufficient. This also makes the dev_err()-like functions more compact
>    and readable (not need of line break).
> 2. Lower from info to debug printing of each RTC interrupt (no need to
>    make noise on each alarm).
> 3. Remove dev_info() at beginning of probe because a message is already
>    always printed by either probe failure or from registering the RTC
>    device as /dev/rtcX.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
> 
> ---
> 
> Patch rebased on top of Javier's v4:
> [PATCH v4 00/10] rtc: max77686: Extend driver and add max77802 support
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg477194.html
> 
> Feel free to join with these series.
> ---
>  drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c | 39 ++++++++++++++-------------------------
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> 
Applied, thanks.

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web