Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1184575 > unrolled thread

[PATCH v2 1/3] drivers/xen/preempt: use need_resched() instead of should_resched()

Started byKonstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru>
First post2015-07-15 12:00 +0200
Last post2015-07-20 15:50 +0200
Articles 7 — 4 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH v2 1/3] drivers/xen/preempt: use need_resched() instead of  should_resched() Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru> - 2015-07-15 12:00 +0200
    [PATCH v2 2/3] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Use need_resched() instead of  should_resched() Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru> - 2015-07-15 12:00 +0200
    [PATCH v2 3/3] sched/preempt: fix cond_resched_lock() and  cond_resched_softirq() Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru> - 2015-07-15 12:00 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] sched/preempt: fix cond_resched_lock() and  cond_resched_softirq() Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> - 2015-07-15 14:20 +0200
        Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] sched/preempt: fix cond_resched_lock() and cond_resched_softirq() Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru> - 2015-07-15 15:00 +0200
          Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] sched/preempt: fix cond_resched_lock() and  cond_resched_softirq() Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-07-15 15:40 +0200
    Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 1/3] drivers/xen/preempt: use need_resched()  instead of should_resched() David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com> - 2015-07-20 15:50 +0200

#1184575 — [PATCH v2 1/3] drivers/xen/preempt: use need_resched() instead of should_resched()

FromKonstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru>
Date2015-07-15 12:00 +0200
Subject[PATCH v2 1/3] drivers/xen/preempt: use need_resched() instead of should_resched()
Message-ID<pMrDR-3RV-33@gated-at.bofh.it>
This code is used only when CONFIG_PREEMPT=n and only in non-atomic context:
xen_in_preemptible_hcall is set only in privcmd_ioctl_hypercall().
Thus preempt_count is zero and should_resched() is equal to need_resched().

Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru>
---
 drivers/xen/preempt.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/xen/preempt.c b/drivers/xen/preempt.c
index a1800c150839..08cb419eb4e6 100644
--- a/drivers/xen/preempt.c
+++ b/drivers/xen/preempt.c
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xen_in_preemptible_hcall);
 asmlinkage __visible void xen_maybe_preempt_hcall(void)
 {
 	if (unlikely(__this_cpu_read(xen_in_preemptible_hcall)
-		     && should_resched())) {
+		     && need_resched())) {
 		/*
 		 * Clear flag as we may be rescheduled on a different
 		 * cpu.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1184606 — [PATCH v2 2/3] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Use need_resched() instead of should_resched()

FromKonstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru>
Date2015-07-15 12:00 +0200
Subject[PATCH v2 2/3] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Use need_resched() instead of should_resched()
Message-ID<pMrDS-3RV-45@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1184575
Function should_resched() is equal to (!preempt_count() && need_resched()).
In preemptive kernel preempt_count here is non-zero because of vc->lock.

Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru>
---
 arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
index 68d067ad4222..a9f753fb73a8 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
@@ -2178,7 +2178,7 @@ static int kvmppc_run_vcpu(struct kvm_run *kvm_run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		vc->runner = vcpu;
 		if (n_ceded == vc->n_runnable) {
 			kvmppc_vcore_blocked(vc);
-		} else if (should_resched()) {
+		} else if (need_resched()) {
 			vc->vcore_state = VCORE_PREEMPT;
 			/* Let something else run */
 			cond_resched_lock(&vc->lock);

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1184609 — [PATCH v2 3/3] sched/preempt: fix cond_resched_lock() and cond_resched_softirq()

FromKonstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru>
Date2015-07-15 12:00 +0200
Subject[PATCH v2 3/3] sched/preempt: fix cond_resched_lock() and cond_resched_softirq()
Message-ID<pMrDS-3RV-53@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1184575
These functions check should_resched() before unlocking spinlock/bh-enable:
preempt_count always non-zero => should_resched() always returns false.
cond_resched_lock() worked iff spin_needbreak is set.

This patch adds argument "preempt_offset" to should_resched().

preempt_count offset constants for that:

PREEMPT_DISABLE_OFFSET  - offset after preempt_disable()
PREEMPT_LOCK_OFFSET     - offset after spin_lock()
SOFTIRQ_DISABLE_OFFSET  - offset after local_bh_distable()
SOFTIRQ_LOCK_OFFSET     - offset after spin_lock_bh()

Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h |    4 ++--
 include/asm-generic/preempt.h  |    5 +++--
 include/linux/preempt.h        |   19 ++++++++++++++-----
 include/linux/sched.h          |    6 ------
 kernel/sched/core.c            |    6 +++---
 5 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h
index dca71714f860..b12f81022a6b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h
@@ -90,9 +90,9 @@ static __always_inline bool __preempt_count_dec_and_test(void)
 /*
  * Returns true when we need to resched and can (barring IRQ state).
  */
-static __always_inline bool should_resched(void)
+static __always_inline bool should_resched(int preempt_offset)
 {
-	return unlikely(!raw_cpu_read_4(__preempt_count));
+	return unlikely(raw_cpu_read_4(__preempt_count) == preempt_offset);
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/preempt.h b/include/asm-generic/preempt.h
index d0a7a4753db2..0bec580a4885 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/preempt.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/preempt.h
@@ -71,9 +71,10 @@ static __always_inline bool __preempt_count_dec_and_test(void)
 /*
  * Returns true when we need to resched and can (barring IRQ state).
  */
-static __always_inline bool should_resched(void)
+static __always_inline bool should_resched(int preempt_offset)
 {
-	return unlikely(!preempt_count() && tif_need_resched());
+	return unlikely(preempt_count() == preempt_offset &&
+			tif_need_resched());
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
diff --git a/include/linux/preempt.h b/include/linux/preempt.h
index 84991f185173..bea8dd8ff5e0 100644
--- a/include/linux/preempt.h
+++ b/include/linux/preempt.h
@@ -84,13 +84,21 @@
  */
 #define in_nmi()	(preempt_count() & NMI_MASK)
 
+/*
+ * The preempt_count offset after preempt_disable();
+ */
 #if defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT)
-# define PREEMPT_DISABLE_OFFSET 1
+# define PREEMPT_DISABLE_OFFSET	PREEMPT_OFFSET
 #else
-# define PREEMPT_DISABLE_OFFSET 0
+# define PREEMPT_DISABLE_OFFSET	0
 #endif
 
 /*
+ * The preempt_count offset after spin_lock()
+ */
+#define PREEMPT_LOCK_OFFSET	PREEMPT_DISABLE_OFFSET
+
+/*
  * The preempt_count offset needed for things like:
  *
  *  spin_lock_bh()
@@ -103,7 +111,7 @@
  *
  * Work as expected.
  */
-#define SOFTIRQ_LOCK_OFFSET (SOFTIRQ_DISABLE_OFFSET + PREEMPT_DISABLE_OFFSET)
+#define SOFTIRQ_LOCK_OFFSET (SOFTIRQ_DISABLE_OFFSET + PREEMPT_LOCK_OFFSET)
 
 /*
  * Are we running in atomic context?  WARNING: this macro cannot
@@ -124,7 +132,8 @@
 #if defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT) || defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_TRACER)
 extern void preempt_count_add(int val);
 extern void preempt_count_sub(int val);
-#define preempt_count_dec_and_test() ({ preempt_count_sub(1); should_resched(); })
+#define preempt_count_dec_and_test() \
+	({ preempt_count_sub(1); should_resched(0); })
 #else
 #define preempt_count_add(val)	__preempt_count_add(val)
 #define preempt_count_sub(val)	__preempt_count_sub(val)
@@ -184,7 +193,7 @@ do { \
 
 #define preempt_check_resched() \
 do { \
-	if (should_resched()) \
+	if (should_resched(0)) \
 		__preempt_schedule(); \
 } while (0)
 
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index ae21f1591615..a8e9b17acdee 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -2885,12 +2885,6 @@ extern int _cond_resched(void);
 
 extern int __cond_resched_lock(spinlock_t *lock);
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT
-#define PREEMPT_LOCK_OFFSET	PREEMPT_OFFSET
-#else
-#define PREEMPT_LOCK_OFFSET	0
-#endif
-
 #define cond_resched_lock(lock) ({				\
 	___might_sleep(__FILE__, __LINE__, PREEMPT_LOCK_OFFSET);\
 	__cond_resched_lock(lock);				\
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 78b4bad10081..d9a4d93dc879 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -4492,7 +4492,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE0(sched_yield)
 
 int __sched _cond_resched(void)
 {
-	if (should_resched()) {
+	if (should_resched(0)) {
 		preempt_schedule_common();
 		return 1;
 	}
@@ -4510,7 +4510,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(_cond_resched);
  */
 int __cond_resched_lock(spinlock_t *lock)
 {
-	int resched = should_resched();
+	int resched = should_resched(PREEMPT_LOCK_OFFSET);
 	int ret = 0;
 
 	lockdep_assert_held(lock);
@@ -4532,7 +4532,7 @@ int __sched __cond_resched_softirq(void)
 {
 	BUG_ON(!in_softirq());
 
-	if (should_resched()) {
+	if (should_resched(SOFTIRQ_DISABLE_OFFSET)) {
 		local_bh_enable();
 		preempt_schedule_common();
 		local_bh_disable();

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1184732 — Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] sched/preempt: fix cond_resched_lock() and cond_resched_softirq()

FromEric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Date2015-07-15 14:20 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 3/3] sched/preempt: fix cond_resched_lock() and cond_resched_softirq()
Message-ID<pMtPj-7dE-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1184609
On Wed, 2015-07-15 at 12:52 +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> These functions check should_resched() before unlocking spinlock/bh-enable:
> preempt_count always non-zero => should_resched() always returns false.
> cond_resched_lock() worked iff spin_needbreak is set.

Interesting, this definitely used to work (linux-3.11)

Any idea of which commit broke things ?



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1184777 — Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] sched/preempt: fix cond_resched_lock() and cond_resched_softirq()

FromKonstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru>
Date2015-07-15 15:00 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 3/3] sched/preempt: fix cond_resched_lock() and cond_resched_softirq()
Message-ID<pMus2-7Xo-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1184732
On 15.07.2015 15:16, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-07-15 at 12:52 +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
>> These functions check should_resched() before unlocking spinlock/bh-enable:
>> preempt_count always non-zero => should_resched() always returns false.
>> cond_resched_lock() worked iff spin_needbreak is set.
>
> Interesting, this definitely used to work (linux-3.11)
>
> Any idea of which commit broke things ?
>

Searching... done

This one: bdb43806589096ac4272fe1307e789846ac08d7c in v3.13

before

-static inline int should_resched(void)
-{
-       return need_resched() && !(preempt_count() & PREEMPT_ACTIVE);
-}

after

+static __always_inline bool should_resched(void)
+{
+       return unlikely(!*preempt_count_ptr());
+}


So,

Fixes: bdb438065890 ("sched: Extract the basic add/sub preempt_count 
modifiers")

-- 
Konstantin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1184806 — Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] sched/preempt: fix cond_resched_lock() and cond_resched_softirq()

FromPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date2015-07-15 15:40 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 3/3] sched/preempt: fix cond_resched_lock() and cond_resched_softirq()
Message-ID<pMv4K-va-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1184777
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 03:52:34PM +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> On 15.07.2015 15:16, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >On Wed, 2015-07-15 at 12:52 +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> >>These functions check should_resched() before unlocking spinlock/bh-enable:
> >>preempt_count always non-zero => should_resched() always returns false.
> >>cond_resched_lock() worked iff spin_needbreak is set.
> >
> >Interesting, this definitely used to work (linux-3.11)
> >
> >Any idea of which commit broke things ?
> >
> 
> Searching... done
> 
> This one: bdb43806589096ac4272fe1307e789846ac08d7c in v3.13
> 
> before
> 
> -static inline int should_resched(void)
> -{
> -       return need_resched() && !(preempt_count() & PREEMPT_ACTIVE);
> -}
> 
> after
> 
> +static __always_inline bool should_resched(void)
> +{
> +       return unlikely(!*preempt_count_ptr());
> +}

Argh, indeed!

> 
> So,
> 
> Fixes: bdb438065890 ("sched: Extract the basic add/sub preempt_count
> modifiers")

Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1188196 — Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 1/3] drivers/xen/preempt: use need_resched() instead of should_resched()

FromDavid Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
Date2015-07-20 15:50 +0200
SubjectRe: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 1/3] drivers/xen/preempt: use need_resched() instead of should_resched()
Message-ID<pOjCb-2OM-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1184575
On 15/07/15 10:52, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> This code is used only when CONFIG_PREEMPT=n and only in non-atomic context:
> xen_in_preemptible_hcall is set only in privcmd_ioctl_hypercall().
> Thus preempt_count is zero and should_resched() is equal to need_resched().

Applied to for-linus-4.3, thanks.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web