Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1738923
| From | Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH net-next] net: mvpp2: phylink support |
| Date | 2017-09-25 12:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <utz7B-5aK-29@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <usa1A-1Eh-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <usu0h-5oP-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <utylc-4Cl-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 11:55:14AM +0200, Antoine Tenart wrote: > Hi Russell, > > On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 12:07:31PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 03:45:22PM +0200, Antoine Tenart wrote: > > > Convert the PPv2 driver to use phylink, which models the MAC to PHY > > > link. The phylink support is made such a way the GoP link IRQ can still > > > be used: the two modes are incompatible and the GoP link IRQ will be > > > used if no PHY is described in the device tree. This is the same > > > behaviour as before. > > > > This makes no sense. The point of phylink is to be able to support SFP > > cages, and SFP cages do not have a PHY described in DT. So, when you > > want to use phylink because of SFP, you can't, because if you omit > > the PHY the driver avoids using phylink. > > Yes that's an issue. However we do need to support the GoP link IRQ > which is also needed in some cases where there is no PHY (and when > phylink cannot be used). What would you propose to differentiate those > two cases: no PHY using phylink, and no PHY using the GoP link IRQ? Can you describe what the GoP link IRQ is doing please? -- RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 8.8Mbps down 630kbps up According to speedtest.net: 8.21Mbps down 510kbps up
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH net-next] net: mvpp2: phylink support Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com> - 2017-09-21 15:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH net-next] net: mvpp2: phylink support Marcin Wojtas <mw@semihalf.com> - 2017-09-22 10:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH net-next] net: mvpp2: phylink support Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk> - 2017-09-22 13:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH net-next] net: mvpp2: phylink support Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com> - 2017-09-25 12:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH net-next] net: mvpp2: phylink support Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk> - 2017-09-25 12:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH net-next] net: mvpp2: phylink support Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com> - 2017-09-25 14:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH net-next] net: mvpp2: phylink support Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk> - 2017-09-25 14:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH net-next] net: mvpp2: phylink support Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com> - 2017-09-25 15:10 +0200
csiph-web