Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1730648

Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix double count on issued discard commands

From Daeho Jeong <daeho.jeong@samsung.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix double count on issued discard commands
Date 2017-09-12 06:40 +0200
Message-ID <uoL9n-4Vo-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <uonJL-5sB-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <uoIEy-31E-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <uoKwG-4jB-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <uoL9n-4Vo-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <uoKZI-4Sv-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


> Yeah, that's exactly like what I made a mistake before.
> I should have mentioned that earlier. :)

Or I think the previous code which used "iter++" might be right.
You might just want to check the fixed number of small discards, DISCARD_ISSUE_RATE,
when issue_cond is "true".

Anyways, I have another question about this function.
How about just issuing, not checking whether it is idle, the fixed number of small
discards, DISCARD_ISSUE_RATE, when issue_cond is "true".
Actually, the discard commands will be issued as "asynchronous" requests,
which has a low priority in the I/O scheduler,
so the performance degradation of other threads by doing this will not be much severe,
but we can make the performance of the storage device better even if there is no idle.

I am just worried about the storage device I/O performance gets worse 
under I/O intensive senario where there is no idle

Thanks,

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH] f2fs: fix double count on issued discard commands Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> - 2017-09-11 05:40 +0200
  Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix double count on issued discard  commands Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> - 2017-09-12 04:00 +0200
    Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix double count on issued discard  commands Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> - 2017-09-12 06:00 +0200
      Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix double count on issued discard  commands Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> - 2017-09-12 06:30 +0200
        Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix double count on issued discard  commands Daeho Jeong <daeho.jeong@samsung.com> - 2017-09-12 06:40 +0200
          Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix double count on issued discard  commands Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> - 2017-09-12 19:20 +0200
          Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix double count on issued discard  commands Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> - 2017-09-13 09:20 +0200
            Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix double count on issued discard  commands Daeho Jeong <daeho.jeong@samsung.com> - 2017-09-13 10:50 +0200

csiph-web