Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1723658
| From | SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 13/14] vme: tsi148: Improve 17 size determinations |
| Date | 2017-08-30 23:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ukifD-4I6-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <uip1T-5RV-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <uipuV-6gP-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <uitRU-nX-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <uiDod-6B4-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <ukh9U-44p-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
>>>> @@ -2363,5 +2364,5 @@ static int tsi148_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id) >>>> master_num--; >>>> >>>> tsi148_device->flush_image = >>>> - kmalloc(sizeof(struct vme_master_resource), GFP_KERNEL); >>>> + kmalloc(sizeof(*tsi148_device->flush_image), GFP_KERNEL); >>> >>> This line is now a tiny bit too long >> >> Can you eventually tolerate a line length of 81 characters at such a source code place? >> > > I think there's some irony here. On the one hand you are submitting > patches that correct coding style issues, on the other you are asking > whether we can ignore the coding style... I test somehow how strict you would like to handle the length limit there. I imagine that the affected source code formatting could also become different if the involved variable name would be shorter. >> * It seems that you would not like to perform such a tweak yourself. > > To be honest, it is quicker and easier in this instance to do just that. Interesting … > So that's now done. Thanks that you picked some of my ideas up. > Patches now in my testing branch: > > https://gitlab.collabora.com/martyn/linux/commits/vme-testing I am curious on how the shown change possibilities will evolve from this repository. >> * Do you expect a resend for the complete patch series? >> > > Unless the maintainer has commented that they have accepted patches x, > y and z, then sending the entire series again is generally the right > thing to do. Would you like to respond further to Greg's comments (from 2017-08-26) for this patch series? Regards, Markus
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 00/14] VME: Adjustments for several function implementations SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-08-25 17:50 +0200
[PATCH 01/14] vme: Delete 11 error messages for a failed memory allocation SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-08-25 18:00 +0200
[PATCH 02/14] vme: Improve 11 size determinations SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-08-25 18:00 +0200
[PATCH 03/14] vme: Move an assignment in vme_new_dma_list() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-08-25 18:00 +0200
[PATCH 04/14] vme: Adjust 48 checks for null pointers SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-08-25 18:00 +0200
[PATCH 07/14] vme: fake: Improve five size determinations in fake_init() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-08-25 18:10 +0200
[PATCH 05/14] vme: Return directly in two functions SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-08-25 18:10 +0200
[PATCH 06/14] vme: fake: Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation in fake_init() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-08-25 18:10 +0200
[PATCH 08/14] vme: fake: Adjust 11 checks for null pointers SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-08-25 18:10 +0200
[PATCH 09/14] vme: ca91cx42: Delete eight error messages for a failed memory allocation SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-08-25 18:10 +0200
[PATCH 10/14] vme: ca91cx42: Improve 12 size determinations SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-08-25 18:10 +0200
[PATCH 13/14] vme: tsi148: Improve 17 size determinations SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-08-25 18:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 13/14] vme: tsi148: Improve 17 size determinations Martyn Welch <martyn@welchs.me.uk> - 2017-08-25 23:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 13/14] vme: tsi148: Improve 17 size determinations SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-08-26 09:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 13/14] vme: tsi148: Improve 17 size determinations Martyn Welch <martyn@welchs.me.uk> - 2017-08-30 21:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 13/14] vme: tsi148: Improve 17 size determinations SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-08-30 23:00 +0200
[PATCH 11/14] vme: ca91cx42: Adjust 14 checks for null pointers SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-08-25 18:20 +0200
[PATCH 12/14] vme: tsi148: Delete nine error messages for a failed memory allocation SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-08-25 18:20 +0200
[PATCH 14/14] vme: tsi148: Adjust 14 checks for null pointers SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-08-25 18:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 00/14] VME: Adjustments for several function implementations Martyn Welch <martyn@welchs.me.uk> - 2017-08-26 00:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 00/14] VME: Adjustments for several function implementations Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2017-08-26 09:10 +0200
csiph-web