Re: [PATCHv3 2/6] dt-bindings: sound: add motorola,cpcap-audio-codec

From	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCHv3 2/6] dt-bindings: sound: add motorola,cpcap-audio-codec
Date	2017-08-18 13:50 +0200
Message-ID	<ufNWN-37L-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<u79MS-4rG-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <u79MS-4rG-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <u7sZc-8do-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <u7MXV-4d2-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <ucYYq-8ev-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 09:53:59AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.co.uk> [170727 02:02]:

> > I don't follow you here. Why can't other parts of the chip use the
> > same supply? Regarding the other point: Handling the audio-codec

They can, they know they're part of the parent chip and should be
looking for the supply on the chip level.

> > differently than all other sub-modules of cpcap seems much more
> > problematic to me and the codec is basically the last one
> > missing:

> Mark, any comments on the above? I'm just wondering if the
> related dts changes are safe for me to pick.

No, they don't make sense.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCHv3 2/6] dt-bindings: sound: add motorola,cpcap-audio-codec Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2017-08-18 13:50 +0200

csiph-web