Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1714827 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCHv3 2/6] dt-bindings: sound: add motorola,cpcap-audio-codec

Started byMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
First post2017-08-18 13:50 +0200
Last post2017-08-18 13:50 +0200
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCHv3 2/6] dt-bindings: sound: add motorola,cpcap-audio-codec Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2017-08-18 13:50 +0200

#1714827 — Re: [PATCHv3 2/6] dt-bindings: sound: add motorola,cpcap-audio-codec

FromMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Date2017-08-18 13:50 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCHv3 2/6] dt-bindings: sound: add motorola,cpcap-audio-codec
Message-ID<ufNWN-37L-5@gated-at.bofh.it>

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 09:53:59AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.co.uk> [170727 02:02]:

> > I don't follow you here. Why can't other parts of the chip use the
> > same supply? Regarding the other point: Handling the audio-codec

They can, they know they're part of the parent chip and should be
looking for the supply on the chip level.

> > differently than all other sub-modules of cpcap seems much more
> > problematic to me and the codec is basically the last one
> > missing:

> Mark, any comments on the above? I'm just wondering if the
> related dts changes are safe for me to pick.

No, they don't make sense.

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web