Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1682876

Re: 答复: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: relax permission for atomic/volatile ioctls

From Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: 答复: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: relax permission for atomic/volatile ioctls
Date 2017-07-07 04:20 +0200
Message-ID <u0r29-5GR-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <u04Ii-6v1-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <u0p0l-4n9-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <u0pa1-4qf-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <u0pMJ-4D0-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <u0r2a-5GR-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 07/07, gaoxiang (P) wrote:
> Hi,
> I think Sdcardfs should override task_struct cred fsuid/fsgid before calling the underlay fs operation.
> And it seems sdcardfs implementations misses override cred fsuid/fsgid before the ioctl operation.

Oh, good catch!

Thank you. ;)

> 
> Thanks.
> 
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: Chao Yu [mailto:chao@kernel.org] 
> 发送时间: 2017年7月7日 8:58
> 收件人: Jaegeuk Kim
> 抄送: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> 主题: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: relax permission for atomic/volatile ioctls
> 
> On 2017/7/7 8:16, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > On 07/07, Chao Yu wrote:
> >> On 2017/7/6 10:23, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> >>> This patch allows atomic/volatile ioctls for sqlite under sdcardfs.
> >>
> >> Out of curiosity, we will lose some capable when passing through sdcardfs?
> > 
> > I don't think so. But, it seems a test applicaion tries to access database from
> > difference uid.
> 
> Oh, is that really allowed? if the sqlite database is public in sdcard directory,
> application needs to apply WRITE_EXTERNAL_STORAGE in order to add itself to
> sdcard_rw group, then it can access the database. Right?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>> ---
> >>>  fs/f2fs/file.c | 15 ---------------
> >>>  1 file changed, 15 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c
> >>> index f5d6357e8360..dd8f5d2caa48 100644
> >>> --- a/fs/f2fs/file.c
> >>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c
> >>> @@ -1587,9 +1587,6 @@ static int f2fs_ioc_start_atomic_write(struct file *filp)
> >>>  	struct inode *inode = file_inode(filp);
> >>>  	int ret;
> >>>  
> >>> -	if (!inode_owner_or_capable(inode))
> >>> -		return -EACCES;
> >>> -
> >>>  	if (!S_ISREG(inode->i_mode))
> >>>  		return -EINVAL;
> >>>  
> >>> @@ -1636,9 +1633,6 @@ static int f2fs_ioc_commit_atomic_write(struct file *filp)
> >>>  	struct inode *inode = file_inode(filp);
> >>>  	int ret;
> >>>  
> >>> -	if (!inode_owner_or_capable(inode))
> >>> -		return -EACCES;
> >>> -
> >>>  	ret = mnt_want_write_file(filp);
> >>>  	if (ret)
> >>>  		return ret;
> >>> @@ -1672,9 +1666,6 @@ static int f2fs_ioc_start_volatile_write(struct file *filp)
> >>>  	struct inode *inode = file_inode(filp);
> >>>  	int ret;
> >>>  
> >>> -	if (!inode_owner_or_capable(inode))
> >>> -		return -EACCES;
> >>> -
> >>>  	if (!S_ISREG(inode->i_mode))
> >>>  		return -EINVAL;
> >>>  
> >>> @@ -1707,9 +1698,6 @@ static int f2fs_ioc_release_volatile_write(struct file *filp)
> >>>  	struct inode *inode = file_inode(filp);
> >>>  	int ret;
> >>>  
> >>> -	if (!inode_owner_or_capable(inode))
> >>> -		return -EACCES;
> >>> -
> >>>  	ret = mnt_want_write_file(filp);
> >>>  	if (ret)
> >>>  		return ret;
> >>> @@ -1736,9 +1724,6 @@ static int f2fs_ioc_abort_volatile_write(struct file *filp)
> >>>  	struct inode *inode = file_inode(filp);
> >>>  	int ret;
> >>>  
> >>> -	if (!inode_owner_or_capable(inode))
> >>> -		return -EACCES;
> >>> -
> >>>  	ret = mnt_want_write_file(filp);
> >>>  	if (ret)
> >>>  		return ret;
> >>>
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH] f2fs: relax permission for atomic/volatile ioctls Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> - 2017-07-06 04:30 +0200
  Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: relax permission for atomic/volatile  ioctls Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> - 2017-07-07 02:10 +0200
    Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: relax permission for atomic/volatile  ioctls Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> - 2017-07-07 02:20 +0200
      Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: relax permission for atomic/volatile  ioctls Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> - 2017-07-07 03:00 +0200
        Re: 答复: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH]  f2fs: relax permission for atomic/volatile ioctls Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> - 2017-07-07 04:20 +0200
          Re: 答复: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: relax permission for atomic/volatile ioctls "gaoxiang (P)" <gaoxiang25@huawei.com> - 2017-07-07 04:30 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] f2fs: relax permission for atomic/volatile ioctls Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com> - 2017-07-07 04:10 +0200

csiph-web