Re: [PATCH V4 1/9] PM / OPP: Allow OPP table to be used for power-domains

From	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH V4 1/9] PM / OPP: Allow OPP table to be used for power-domains
Date	2017-04-20 12:00 +0200
Message-ID	<tyh2x-7kt-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	(5 earlier) <txDRw-8e8-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <txWhr-2Xi-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <txYjf-46P-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <tycPg-4PM-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <tygSR-7gN-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On 20-04-17, 10:43, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> Just that the term performance is closely related to frequency, it needs
> to be explicit on what *exactly* it means. As it stands now,
> it can be used for OPP as I explain which controls both but as you
> clarify that's not what it's designed for.

We are talking about active states of a power domain here and
*performance* is the best word I got. And yes we can still have
frequency as a configurable here, just that current platforms don't
have it.

> I am not sure if choosing highest performance point makes it difficult
> to fit it in regulator framework. It could be some configuration.

I was just pointing out a difference :)

> Also IIUC the actual programming is done in the firmware in this case
> and I fail to see how that adds lot of platform code.

Oh I meant that for converting general regulator only cases to OPP. No
firmware was involved there.

-- 
viresh

Thread

Re: [PATCH V4 1/9] PM / OPP: Allow OPP table to be used for  power-domains Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2017-04-12 19:00 +0200
  Re: [PATCH V4 1/9] PM / OPP: Allow OPP table to be used for  power-domains Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-04-13 07:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH V4 1/9] PM / OPP: Allow OPP table to be used for  power-domains Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2017-04-13 15:50 +0200
      Re: [PATCH V4 1/9] PM / OPP: Allow OPP table to be used for  power-domains Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-04-17 07:30 +0200
        Re: [PATCH V4 1/9] PM / OPP: Allow OPP table to be used for  power-domains Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2017-04-18 18:10 +0200
          Re: [PATCH V4 1/9] PM / OPP: Allow OPP table to be used for  power-domains Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-04-19 12:20 +0200
          Re: [PATCH V4 1/9] PM / OPP: Allow OPP table to be used for  power-domains Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-04-19 13:50 +0200
            Re: [PATCH V4 1/9] PM / OPP: Allow OPP table to be used for  power-domains Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2017-04-19 16:00 +0200
              Re: [PATCH V4 1/9] PM / OPP: Allow OPP table to be used for  power-domains Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-04-20 07:30 +0200
                Re: [PATCH V4 1/9] PM / OPP: Allow OPP table to be used for power-domains Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> - 2017-04-20 10:30 +0200
                Re: [PATCH V4 1/9] PM / OPP: Allow OPP table to be used for  power-domains Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-04-20 11:40 +0200
                Re: [PATCH V4 1/9] PM / OPP: Allow OPP table to be used for  power-domains Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2017-04-20 12:00 +0200
                Re: [PATCH V4 1/9] PM / OPP: Allow OPP table to be used for  power-domains Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2017-04-20 11:50 +0200
                Re: [PATCH V4 1/9] PM / OPP: Allow OPP table to be used for  power-domains Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-04-20 12:00 +0200
                Re: [PATCH V4 1/9] PM / OPP: Allow OPP table to be used for power-domains Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com> - 2017-04-24 21:10 +0200

csiph-web