Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1610612
| From | William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 7/9] gpio: 104-idi-48: make use of raw_spinlock variants |
| Date | 2017-03-28 13:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tpXNn-6Vx-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tnALf-1nk-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tnBR0-266-31@gated-at.bofh.it> <tnO1Q-2wP-31@gated-at.bofh.it> <tpVsd-5pw-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 11:11:59AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: >On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 1:44 PM, William Breathitt Gray ><vilhelm.gray@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 05:43:07PM -0500, Julia Cartwright wrote: >>>The 104-idi-48 gpio driver currently implements an irq_chip for handling >>>interrupts; due to how irq_chip handling is done, it's necessary for the >>>irq_chip methods to be invoked from hardirq context, even on a a >>>real-time kernel. Because the spinlock_t type becomes a "sleeping" >>>spinlock w/ RT kernels, it is not suitable to be used with irq_chips. >>> >>>A quick audit of the operations under the lock reveal that they do only >>>minimal, bounded work, and are therefore safe to do under a raw spinlock. >>> >>>Signed-off-by: Julia Cartwright <julia@ni.com> >> >> Hi Julia, >> >> This driver also uses a second spinlock_t, called ack_lock, to prevent >> reentrance into the idi_48_irq_handler function. Should ack_lock also be >> implemented as a raw_spinlock_t? > >Hm, can I apply this one patch or not? > >Linus Walleij Oops, sorry for missing this reply. Julia is correct that ack_lock does not need to be implemented as raw_spinlock_t. For reference, ack_lock is used to prevent a race condition on the device hardware itself related to how the 104-IDI-48 acknowledges IRQ (check out the commit description for it for a more in-depth explanation if you're curious). Long story short: Julia's patch is prefectly acceptable as is. Acked-by: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@gmail.com> William Breathitt Gray
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v2 7/9] gpio: 104-idi-48: make use of raw_spinlock variants Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> - 2017-03-28 11:20 +0200 Re: [PATCH v2 7/9] gpio: 104-idi-48: make use of raw_spinlock variants William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 13:50 +0200
csiph-web