Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1610453
| From | Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 7/9] gpio: 104-idi-48: make use of raw_spinlock variants |
| Date | 2017-03-28 11:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tpVsd-5pw-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tnALf-1nk-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tnBR0-266-31@gated-at.bofh.it> <tnO1Q-2wP-31@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 1:44 PM, William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 05:43:07PM -0500, Julia Cartwright wrote: >>The 104-idi-48 gpio driver currently implements an irq_chip for handling >>interrupts; due to how irq_chip handling is done, it's necessary for the >>irq_chip methods to be invoked from hardirq context, even on a a >>real-time kernel. Because the spinlock_t type becomes a "sleeping" >>spinlock w/ RT kernels, it is not suitable to be used with irq_chips. >> >>A quick audit of the operations under the lock reveal that they do only >>minimal, bounded work, and are therefore safe to do under a raw spinlock. >> >>Signed-off-by: Julia Cartwright <julia@ni.com> > > Hi Julia, > > This driver also uses a second spinlock_t, called ack_lock, to prevent > reentrance into the idi_48_irq_handler function. Should ack_lock also be > implemented as a raw_spinlock_t? Hm, can I apply this one patch or not? Linus Walleij
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v2 0/9] fixup usage of non-raw spinlocks in irqchips Julia Cartwright <julia@ni.com> - 2017-03-22 01:00 +0100
[PATCH v2 7/9] gpio: 104-idi-48: make use of raw_spinlock variants Julia Cartwright <julia@ni.com> - 2017-03-22 01:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 7/9] gpio: 104-idi-48: make use of raw_spinlock variants William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 14:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 7/9] gpio: 104-idi-48: make use of raw_spinlock variants Julia Cartwright <julia@ni.com> - 2017-03-22 17:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 7/9] gpio: 104-idi-48: make use of raw_spinlock variants Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> - 2017-03-28 11:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 7/9] gpio: 104-idi-48: make use of raw_spinlock variants William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 13:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 7/9] gpio: 104-idi-48: make use of raw_spinlock variants Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> - 2017-03-28 15:10 +0200
csiph-web