Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1606734

Re: [PATCH] sched: fair: Improve PELT decay_load calculation comments

Show all headers | View raw

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 7:16 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 12:23:41PM -0800, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>> The PELT decay_load comments are a bit confusing, first of all
>> the 1/2^N should be (1/2)^N so that the reader doesn't get confused.
>
> I'm thinking you're confused. They're identical.
>
> (1/2)^N = (2^-1)^N = 2^-N = 1/2^N

They are identical I know, but I meant by enclosing the 1/2 in
brackets, it is more clear that we multiply by 1/2 N times to the
first time reader - for the reason that we'd like to reduce the PELT
calculated load by 1/2 N times.

>> Secondly, the y^N splitting into a 2-part decay factor deserves
>> a better explanation. This patch improves the comments.
>
> I find its actually harder to read.

Oh, which part? Can you help improve it? Maybe I didn't word something
correctly?

Regards,
Joel

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH] sched: fair: Improve PELT decay_load calculation comments Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-03-22 15:20 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] sched: fair: Improve PELT decay_load calculation comments Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com> - 2017-03-22 17:40 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] sched: fair: Improve PELT decay_load calculation comments Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-03-22 18:10 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] sched: fair: Improve PELT decay_load calculation comments Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com> - 2017-03-22 20:20 +0100

csiph-web