Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1606760
| From | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] sched: fair: Improve PELT decay_load calculation comments |
| Date | 2017-03-22 18:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tnRVL-5RD-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tjzkK-Cj-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <tnPhf-3Fu-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <tnRsK-5on-25@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 09:35:43AM -0700, Joel Fernandes wrote: > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 7:16 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 12:23:41PM -0800, Joel Fernandes wrote: > >> The PELT decay_load comments are a bit confusing, first of all > >> the 1/2^N should be (1/2)^N so that the reader doesn't get confused. > > > > I'm thinking you're confused. They're identical. > > > > (1/2)^N = (2^-1)^N = 2^-N = 1/2^N > > They are identical I know, but I meant by enclosing the 1/2 in > brackets, it is more clear that we multiply by 1/2 N times to the > first time reader - for the reason that we'd like to reduce the PELT > calculated load by 1/2 N times. Must be me then, because I've never been confused about that. Esp. so since the first part: y^p = 1/2, explicitly mentions half. So its clear from the factorization that half is meant. > >> Secondly, the y^N splitting into a 2-part decay factor deserves > >> a better explanation. This patch improves the comments. > > > > I find its actually harder to read. > > Oh, which part? Can you help improve it? Maybe I didn't word something > correctly? I think the fact that there's now words actually makes it worse. The equation very concisely shows what we do. I don't see why we need extra words there to obscure things.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH] sched: fair: Improve PELT decay_load calculation comments Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-03-22 15:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] sched: fair: Improve PELT decay_load calculation comments Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com> - 2017-03-22 17:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] sched: fair: Improve PELT decay_load calculation comments Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-03-22 18:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] sched: fair: Improve PELT decay_load calculation comments Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com> - 2017-03-22 20:20 +0100
csiph-web